2020-12-01 09:21:29

by Nobuhiro Iwamatsu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: gpio: Add bindings for Toshiba Visconti GPIO Controller

Add bindings for the Toshiba Visconti GPIO Controller.

Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
---
.../bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5168a15b90e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Toshiba Visconti ARM SoCs GPIO controller
+
+maintainers:
+ - Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ items:
+ - const: toshiba,gpio-tmpv7708
+
+ reg:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ "#gpio-cells":
+ const: 2
+
+ gpio-ranges: true
+
+ gpio-controller: true
+
+ interrupt-controller: true
+
+ "#interrupt-cells":
+ const: 2
+
+ interrupts:
+ description:
+ interrupt mapping one per GPIO.
+ minItems: 16
+ maxItems: 16
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - "#gpio-cells"
+ - gpio-ranges
+ - gpio-controller
+ - interrupt-controller
+ - "#interrupt-cells"
+ - interrupts
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+ #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+
+ soc {
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+
+ gpio: gpio@28020000 {
+ compatible = "toshiba,gpio-tmpv7708";
+ reg = <0 0x28020000 0 0x1000>;
+ #gpio-cells = <0x2>;
+ gpio-ranges = <&pmux 0 0 32>;
+ gpio-controller;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = <2>;
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 27 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 29 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 31 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 32 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 33 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 34 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 35 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 38 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+ <GIC_SPI 39 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ };
+ };
+...
--
2.29.2


2020-12-03 08:23:56

by Punit Agrawal

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: gpio: Add bindings for Toshiba Visconti GPIO Controller

Iwamatsu-san,

Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]> writes:

> Add bindings for the Toshiba Visconti GPIO Controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5168a15b90e1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Toshiba Visconti ARM SoCs GPIO controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + items:
> + - const: toshiba,gpio-tmpv7708
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + "#gpio-cells":
> + const: 2
> +
> + gpio-ranges: true

I am not sure I have a good handle on the yaml schema definitions but
"gpio-ranges" feels like it should be a list of ranges not a boolean.

Something like -

gpio-ranges:
maxItems: 1

feels more appropriate.

I see both the usages in gpio bindings and for other range properties so
maybe it's OK. I hope Rob or somebody more knowledgeable on this can
clarify the usage.

Otherwise, the patch looks good.

Thanks,
Punit

> +
> + gpio-controller: true
> +
> + interrupt-controller: true
> +
> + "#interrupt-cells":
> + const: 2
> +
> + interrupts:
> + description:
> + interrupt mapping one per GPIO.
> + minItems: 16
> + maxItems: 16
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - "#gpio-cells"
> + - gpio-ranges
> + - gpio-controller
> + - interrupt-controller
> + - "#interrupt-cells"
> + - interrupts
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +
> + soc {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + gpio: gpio@28020000 {
> + compatible = "toshiba,gpio-tmpv7708";
> + reg = <0 0x28020000 0 0x1000>;
> + #gpio-cells = <0x2>;
> + gpio-ranges = <&pmux 0 0 32>;
> + gpio-controller;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 27 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 29 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 31 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 32 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 33 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 34 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 35 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 38 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 39 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + };
> + };
> +...

2020-12-09 16:44:59

by Rob Herring (Arm)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: gpio: Add bindings for Toshiba Visconti GPIO Controller

On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 03:14:03 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Add bindings for the Toshiba Visconti GPIO Controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
>

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>

2020-12-09 16:45:05

by Rob Herring (Arm)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: gpio: Add bindings for Toshiba Visconti GPIO Controller

On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 05:16:51PM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Iwamatsu-san,
>
> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Add bindings for the Toshiba Visconti GPIO Controller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..5168a15b90e1
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Toshiba Visconti ARM SoCs GPIO controller
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + items:
> > + - const: toshiba,gpio-tmpv7708
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + "#gpio-cells":
> > + const: 2
> > +
> > + gpio-ranges: true
>
> I am not sure I have a good handle on the yaml schema definitions but
> "gpio-ranges" feels like it should be a list of ranges not a boolean.
>
> Something like -
>
> gpio-ranges:
> maxItems: 1
>
> feels more appropriate.
>
> I see both the usages in gpio bindings and for other range properties so
> maybe it's OK. I hope Rob or somebody more knowledgeable on this can
> clarify the usage.

If you know how many (or a range) entries there are for gpio-ranges,
then maxItems is good. If you don't, then 'gpio-ranges: true' is fine.
That doesn't make the property a boolean, but just says the property can
be present.

Rob

2020-12-10 03:19:58

by Punit Agrawal

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: gpio: Add bindings for Toshiba Visconti GPIO Controller

Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]> writes:

> Add bindings for the Toshiba Visconti GPIO Controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5168a15b90e1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/toshiba,gpio-visconti.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Toshiba Visconti ARM SoCs GPIO controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + items:
> + - const: toshiba,gpio-tmpv7708
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + "#gpio-cells":
> + const: 2
> +
> + gpio-ranges: true
> +
> + gpio-controller: true
> +
> + interrupt-controller: true
> +
> + "#interrupt-cells":
> + const: 2
> +
> + interrupts:
> + description:
> + interrupt mapping one per GPIO.
> + minItems: 16
> + maxItems: 16
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - "#gpio-cells"
> + - gpio-ranges
> + - gpio-controller
> + - interrupt-controller
> + - "#interrupt-cells"
> + - interrupts
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +
> + soc {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + gpio: gpio@28020000 {
> + compatible = "toshiba,gpio-tmpv7708";
> + reg = <0 0x28020000 0 0x1000>;
> + #gpio-cells = <0x2>;
> + gpio-ranges = <&pmux 0 0 32>;
> + gpio-controller;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 27 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 29 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 31 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 32 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 33 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 34 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 35 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 38 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 39 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + };
> + };
> +...

FWIW,

Reviewed-by: Punit Agrawal <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Punit

2020-12-10 06:40:46

by Punit Agrawal

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: gpio: Add bindings for Toshiba Visconti GPIO Controller

Rob Herring <[email protected]> writes:

[...]

>> > + gpio-ranges: true
>>
>> I am not sure I have a good handle on the yaml schema definitions but
>> "gpio-ranges" feels like it should be a list of ranges not a boolean.
>>
>> Something like -
>>
>> gpio-ranges:
>> maxItems: 1
>>
>> feels more appropriate.
>>
>> I see both the usages in gpio bindings and for other range properties so
>> maybe it's OK. I hope Rob or somebody more knowledgeable on this can
>> clarify the usage.
>
> If you know how many (or a range) entries there are for gpio-ranges,
> then maxItems is good. If you don't, then 'gpio-ranges: true' is fine.
> That doesn't make the property a boolean, but just says the property can
> be present.

Makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.

[...]