2024-01-31 01:00:11

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio-brgl tree with the jc_docs tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the gpio-brgl tree got a conflict in:

Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst

between commit:

8722435d325b ("docs: rework the userspace-api top page")

from the jc_docs tree and commit:

32a0a0da530e ("Documentation: gpio: add chardev userspace API documentation")

from the gpio-brgl tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
index 67d663cf2ff2,ee58d92c53c7..000000000000
--- a/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
@@@ -30,18 -16,14 +30,19 @@@ Security-related interface
no_new_privs
seccomp_filter
landlock
- unshare
+ lsm
spec_ctrl
+ tee
+
+Devices and I/O
+===============
+
+.. toctree::
+ :maxdepth: 1
+
accelerators/ocxl
dma-buf-alloc-exchange
- ebpf/index
- ELF
+ gpio/index
- ioctl/index
iommu
iommufd
media/index


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2024-01-31 07:30:42

by Bartosz Golaszewski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio-brgl tree with the jc_docs tree

On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 01:59, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the gpio-brgl tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
>
> between commit:
>
> 8722435d325b ("docs: rework the userspace-api top page")
>
> from the jc_docs tree and commit:
>
> 32a0a0da530e ("Documentation: gpio: add chardev userspace API documentation")
>
> from the gpio-brgl tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
> index 67d663cf2ff2,ee58d92c53c7..000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
> @@@ -30,18 -16,14 +30,19 @@@ Security-related interface
> no_new_privs
> seccomp_filter
> landlock
> - unshare
> + lsm
> spec_ctrl
> + tee
> +
> +Devices and I/O
> +===============
> +
> +.. toctree::
> + :maxdepth: 1
> +
> accelerators/ocxl
> dma-buf-alloc-exchange
> - ebpf/index
> - ELF
> + gpio/index
> - ioctl/index
> iommu
> iommufd
> media/index

Looks good, thanks!

Bart

2024-01-31 14:27:00

by Jonathan Corbet

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio-brgl tree with the jc_docs tree

Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the gpio-brgl tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/userspace-api/index.rst
>
> between commit:
>
> 8722435d325b ("docs: rework the userspace-api top page")
>
> from the jc_docs tree and commit:
>
> 32a0a0da530e ("Documentation: gpio: add chardev userspace API documentation")
>
> from the gpio-brgl tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

That seems like a fine fix. Part of the purpose of the userspace-api
reorg was to, hopefully, reduce the frequency of these conflicts going
forward...

Thanks,

jon