Hi,
Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 07:09:38AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 May 2017 22:52:28 -0400
>> Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 18 May 2017 10:26:59 +0800
>> > Chunyan Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 17 May 2017 at 16:05, Felipe Balbi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > That way, users don't need to keep a global static pointer and can
>> > > > rely on container_of() to fetch their own structure.
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>
>> > >
>> > > Reviewed-by: Chunyan Zhang <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >
>> > If someone wants to pull this through their tree, feel free to do
>> > so. I've already acked it.
>>
>> I guess nobody pulled this in. Does it still need to go? I'll add it to
>> my tree and start testing it, but I'll drop it if it's not needed (or I
>> don't get a response to this email).
>
> Ouch, it somehow got lost in my inbox. I don't mind taking it through my
> tree if there are no objections.
let me know if you guys need a rebase.
--
balbi