On 23/03/2021 13:12, Jian Dong wrote:
> From: Jian Dong <[email protected]>
>
> Fixes coccicheck error:
>
> drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c:388:8-33: ERROR:
> drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c:781:7-32: ERROR:
> drivers/regulator/slg51000-regulator.c:480:8-33: ERROR:
> drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c:364:8-33: ERROR:
> Threaded IRQ with no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT
>
> Signed-off-by: Jian Dong <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c | 2 +-
> drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/regulator/slg51000-regulator.c | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c
> index 15308ee..947350d 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c
> @@ -385,8 +385,8 @@ static int mt6360_regulator_irq_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return irq;
> }
>
> - ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL, irq_desc->handler, 0,
> - irq_desc->name, rdev);
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL, irq_desc->handler,
> + IRQF_ONESHOT, irq_desc->name, rdev);
This does not look like trivial rename/replace fix. This should be
tested but it looks that you just did what coccinelle asked for, without
testing.
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Fail to request %s irq\n", irq_desc->name);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c
> index 2f7ee21..d4bc1c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c
> @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ static int pca9450_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>
> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(pca9450->dev, pca9450->irq, NULL,
> pca9450_irq_handler,
> - (IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT),
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
How this is related to the missing IRQF_ONESHOT?
> "pca9450-irq", pca9450);
> if (ret != 0) {
> dev_err(pca9450->dev, "Failed to request IRQ: %d\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c
> index de25e32..cac5fd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c
> @@ -362,7 +362,8 @@ static int qcom_labibb_set_ocp(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> return ret;
>
> return devm_request_threaded_irq(vreg->dev, vreg->ocp_irq, NULL,
> - qcom_labibb_ocp_isr, irq_flags,
> + qcom_labibb_ocp_isr,
> + irq_flags | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> ocp_irq_name, vreg);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/slg51000-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/slg51000-regulator.c
> index 75a941f..3f310ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/slg51000-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/slg51000-regulator.c
> @@ -479,8 +479,8 @@ static int slg51000_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> if (chip->chip_irq) {
> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, chip->chip_irq, NULL,
> slg51000_irq_handler,
> - (IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH |
> - IRQF_ONESHOT),
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH |
> + IRQF_ONESHOT,
> "slg51000-irq", chip);
How this is related to the missing IRQF_ONESHOT?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Hi,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> writes:
> On 23/03/2021 13:12, Jian Dong wrote:
>> From: Jian Dong <[email protected]>
>>
>> Fixes coccicheck error:
>>
>> drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c:388:8-33: ERROR:
>> drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c:781:7-32: ERROR:
>> drivers/regulator/slg51000-regulator.c:480:8-33: ERROR:
>> drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c:364:8-33: ERROR:
>> Threaded IRQ with no primary handler requested without IRQF_ONESHOT
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jian Dong <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/regulator/slg51000-regulator.c | 4 ++--
>> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c
>> index 15308ee..947350d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c
>> @@ -385,8 +385,8 @@ static int mt6360_regulator_irq_register(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> return irq;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL, irq_desc->handler, 0,
>> - irq_desc->name, rdev);
>> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL, irq_desc->handler,
>> + IRQF_ONESHOT, irq_desc->name, rdev);
>
> This does not look like trivial rename/replace fix. This should be
> tested but it looks that you just did what coccinelle asked for, without
> testing.
Right, but it must be done. If things work today, they work out of sheer
luck. Also, which evidence is there that $subject wasn't tested?
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c
>> index 2f7ee21..d4bc1c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c
>> @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ static int pca9450_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>>
>> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(pca9450->dev, pca9450->irq, NULL,
>> pca9450_irq_handler,
>> - (IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT),
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>
> How this is related to the missing IRQF_ONESHOT?
agreed.
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/slg51000-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/slg51000-regulator.c
>> index 75a941f..3f310ab 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/slg51000-regulator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/slg51000-regulator.c
>> @@ -479,8 +479,8 @@ static int slg51000_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>> if (chip->chip_irq) {
>> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, chip->chip_irq, NULL,
>> slg51000_irq_handler,
>> - (IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH |
>> - IRQF_ONESHOT),
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH |
>> + IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> "slg51000-irq", chip);
>
> How this is related to the missing IRQF_ONESHOT?
agreed.
--
balbi