2018-02-19 15:19:48

by Akshay Adiga

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle/powernv : Restore different PSSCR for idle and hotplug

commit 1e1601b38e6e ("powerpc/powernv/idle: Restore SPRs for deep idle
states via stop API.") uses stop-api provided by the firmware to restore
PSSCR. PSSCR restore is required for handling special wakeup. When special
wakeup is completed, the core enters stop state based on restored PSSCR.

Currently PSSCR is restored to deepest available stop state, causing
a idle cpu to enter deeper stop state on a special wakeup, which causes
the cpu to hang on wakeup.

A "sensors" command which reads temperature (through DTS sensors) on idle
cpu can trigger special wakeup.

Failed Scenario :
Request restore of PSSCR with RL = 11
cpu enters idle state (stop5)
user triggers "sensors" command
Assert special wakeup on cpu
Restores PSSCR with RL = 11 <---- Done by firmware
Read DTS sensor
Deassert special wakeup
cpu enters idle state (stop11) <-- Instead of stop5

Cpu hang is caused because cpu ended up in a deeper state than it requested

This patch fixes instability caused by special wakeup when stop11 is
enabled. Requests restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state used by cpuidle.
Only when offlining cpu, request restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state.
On onlining cpu, request restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state used by
cpuidle.

Fixes : 1e1601b38e6e ("powerpc/powernv/idle: Restore SPRs for deep idle
states via stop API.")
Reported-by: Pridhiviraj Paidipeddi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Akshay Adiga <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 2 ++
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 1 -
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpuidle.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpuidle.h
index e210a83..f52e9f1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpuidle.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpuidle.h
@@ -67,6 +67,8 @@
#define ERR_EC_ESL_MISMATCH -1
#define ERR_DEEP_STATE_ESL_MISMATCH -2

+#define POWERNV_THRESHOLD_LATENCY_NS 200000
+
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
/* Additional SPRs that need to be saved/restored during stop */
struct stop_sprs {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
index 443d5ca..4b0c7d24 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
@@ -56,8 +56,11 @@ u64 pnv_first_deep_stop_state = MAX_STOP_STATE;
*/
static u64 pnv_deepest_stop_psscr_val;
static u64 pnv_deepest_stop_psscr_mask;
+static u64 pnv_deepest_cpuidle_psscr_val;
+static u64 pnv_deepest_cpuidle_psscr_mask;
static u64 pnv_deepest_stop_flag;
static bool deepest_stop_found;
+static bool deepest_cpuidle_found;

static int pnv_save_sprs_for_deep_states(void)
{
@@ -76,7 +79,14 @@ static int pnv_save_sprs_for_deep_states(void)
uint64_t hid5_val = mfspr(SPRN_HID5);
uint64_t hmeer_val = mfspr(SPRN_HMEER);
uint64_t msr_val = MSR_IDLE;
- uint64_t psscr_val = pnv_deepest_stop_psscr_val;
+
+ /*
+ * Pick deepest cpuidle psscr as the value to be
+ * restored through wakeup engine.
+ * We will request a deeper state to be restored
+ * in hotplug path
+ */
+ uint64_t psscr_val = pnv_deepest_cpuidle_psscr_val;

for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
uint64_t pir = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);
@@ -409,7 +419,7 @@ static void pnv_program_cpu_hotplug_lpcr(unsigned int cpu, u64 lpcr_val)
*/
unsigned long pnv_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
{
- unsigned long srr1;
+ u64 srr1;
u32 idle_states = pnv_get_supported_cpuidle_states();
u64 lpcr_val;

@@ -429,12 +439,18 @@ unsigned long pnv_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
__ppc64_runlatch_off();

if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300) && deepest_stop_found) {
- unsigned long psscr;
+ u64 psscr;
+ u64 pir = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);

psscr = mfspr(SPRN_PSSCR);
psscr = (psscr & ~pnv_deepest_stop_psscr_mask) |
pnv_deepest_stop_psscr_val;
+ if (pnv_deepest_stop_psscr_val != pnv_deepest_cpuidle_psscr_val)
+ opal_slw_set_reg(pir, P9_STOP_SPR_PSSCR, psscr);
srr1 = power9_idle_stop(psscr);
+ psscr = (psscr & ~pnv_deepest_cpuidle_psscr_mask) |
+ pnv_deepest_cpuidle_psscr_val;
+ opal_slw_set_reg(pir, P9_STOP_SPR_PSSCR, psscr);

} else if ((idle_states & OPAL_PM_WINKLE_ENABLED) &&
(idle_states & OPAL_PM_LOSE_FULL_CONTEXT)) {
@@ -555,6 +571,7 @@ static int __init pnv_power9_idle_init(struct device_node *np, u32 *flags,
u64 *psscr_val = NULL;
u64 *psscr_mask = NULL;
u32 *residency_ns = NULL;
+ u32 *latency_ns = NULL;
u64 max_residency_ns = 0;
int rc = 0, i;

@@ -562,6 +579,8 @@ static int __init pnv_power9_idle_init(struct device_node *np, u32 *flags,
psscr_mask = kcalloc(dt_idle_states, sizeof(*psscr_mask), GFP_KERNEL);
residency_ns = kcalloc(dt_idle_states, sizeof(*residency_ns),
GFP_KERNEL);
+ latency_ns = kcalloc(dt_idle_states, sizeof(*latency_ns),
+ GFP_KERNEL);

if (!psscr_val || !psscr_mask || !residency_ns) {
rc = -1;
@@ -591,6 +610,13 @@ static int __init pnv_power9_idle_init(struct device_node *np, u32 *flags,
rc = -1;
goto out;
}
+ if (of_property_read_u32_array(np,
+ "ibm,cpu-idle-state-latencies-ns",
+ latency_ns, dt_idle_states)) {
+ pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: missing ibm,cpu-idle-state-latency-ns in DT\n");
+ rc = -1;
+ goto out;
+ }

/*
* Set pnv_first_deep_stop_state, pnv_deepest_stop_psscr_{val,mask},
@@ -621,6 +647,12 @@ static int __init pnv_power9_idle_init(struct device_node *np, u32 *flags,
continue;
}

+ if (latency_ns[i] <= POWERNV_THRESHOLD_LATENCY_NS) {
+ pnv_deepest_cpuidle_psscr_val = psscr_val[i];
+ pnv_deepest_cpuidle_psscr_mask = psscr_mask[i];
+ deepest_cpuidle_found = true;
+ }
+
if (max_residency_ns < residency_ns[i]) {
max_residency_ns = residency_ns[i];
pnv_deepest_stop_psscr_val = psscr_val[i];
@@ -653,6 +685,14 @@ static int __init pnv_power9_idle_init(struct device_node *np, u32 *flags,
pnv_deepest_stop_psscr_mask);
}

+ if (unlikely(!deepest_cpuidle_found)) {
+ pr_warn("cpuidle-powernv: No suitable deepest CPU-idle state found");
+ } else {
+ pr_info("cpuidle-powernv: Deepest cpuidle: psscr = 0x%016llx,mask=0x%016llx\n",
+ pnv_deepest_cpuidle_psscr_val,
+ pnv_deepest_cpuidle_psscr_mask);
+ }
+
pr_info("cpuidle-powernv: Requested Level (RL) value of first deep stop = 0x%llx\n",
pnv_first_deep_stop_state);
out:
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
index 1a8234e..620765d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
* Expose only those Hardware idle states via the cpuidle framework
* that have latency value below POWERNV_THRESHOLD_LATENCY_NS.
*/
-#define POWERNV_THRESHOLD_LATENCY_NS 200000

static struct cpuidle_driver powernv_idle_driver = {
.name = "powernv_idle",
--
2.5.5



2018-02-26 04:51:00

by Stewart Smith

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle/powernv : Restore different PSSCR for idle and hotplug

Akshay Adiga <[email protected]> writes:
> commit 1e1601b38e6e ("powerpc/powernv/idle: Restore SPRs for deep idle
> states via stop API.") uses stop-api provided by the firmware to restore
> PSSCR. PSSCR restore is required for handling special wakeup. When special
> wakeup is completed, the core enters stop state based on restored PSSCR.
>
> Currently PSSCR is restored to deepest available stop state, causing
> a idle cpu to enter deeper stop state on a special wakeup, which causes
> the cpu to hang on wakeup.
>
> A "sensors" command which reads temperature (through DTS sensors) on idle
> cpu can trigger special wakeup.
>
> Failed Scenario :
> Request restore of PSSCR with RL = 11
> cpu enters idle state (stop5)
> user triggers "sensors" command
> Assert special wakeup on cpu
> Restores PSSCR with RL = 11 <---- Done by firmware
> Read DTS sensor
> Deassert special wakeup
> cpu enters idle state (stop11) <-- Instead of stop5
>
> Cpu hang is caused because cpu ended up in a deeper state than it requested
>
> This patch fixes instability caused by special wakeup when stop11 is
> enabled. Requests restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state used by cpuidle.
> Only when offlining cpu, request restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state.
> On onlining cpu, request restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state used by
> cpuidle.
>
> Fixes : 1e1601b38e6e ("powerpc/powernv/idle: Restore SPRs for deep idle
> states via stop API.")

This should CC stable ?

We'll need this to enable stop11 in firmware and not break things, right?

--
Stewart Smith
OPAL Architect, IBM.


2018-02-28 19:21:08

by Akshay Adiga

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle/powernv : Restore different PSSCR for idle and hotplug

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 03:47:12PM +1100, Stewart Smith wrote:
> Akshay Adiga <[email protected]> writes:
> > commit 1e1601b38e6e ("powerpc/powernv/idle: Restore SPRs for deep idle
> > states via stop API.") uses stop-api provided by the firmware to restore
> > PSSCR. PSSCR restore is required for handling special wakeup. When special
> > wakeup is completed, the core enters stop state based on restored PSSCR.
> >
> > Currently PSSCR is restored to deepest available stop state, causing
> > a idle cpu to enter deeper stop state on a special wakeup, which causes
> > the cpu to hang on wakeup.
> >
> > A "sensors" command which reads temperature (through DTS sensors) on idle
> > cpu can trigger special wakeup.
> >
> > Failed Scenario :
> > Request restore of PSSCR with RL = 11
> > cpu enters idle state (stop5)
> > user triggers "sensors" command
> > Assert special wakeup on cpu
> > Restores PSSCR with RL = 11 <---- Done by firmware
> > Read DTS sensor
> > Deassert special wakeup
> > cpu enters idle state (stop11) <-- Instead of stop5
> >
> > Cpu hang is caused because cpu ended up in a deeper state than it requested
> >
> > This patch fixes instability caused by special wakeup when stop11 is
> > enabled. Requests restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state used by cpuidle.
> > Only when offlining cpu, request restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state.
> > On onlining cpu, request restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state used by
> > cpuidle.
> >
> > Fixes : 1e1601b38e6e ("powerpc/powernv/idle: Restore SPRs for deep idle
> > states via stop API.")
>
> This should CC stable ?
>
> We'll need this to enable stop11 in firmware and not break things, right?

Yes I will resend and CC it to stable.
>
> --
> Stewart Smith
> OPAL Architect, IBM.
>


2018-03-01 01:37:59

by Michael Ellerman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle/powernv : Restore different PSSCR for idle and hotplug

Akshay Adiga <[email protected]> writes:

> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 03:47:12PM +1100, Stewart Smith wrote:
>> Akshay Adiga <[email protected]> writes:
>> > commit 1e1601b38e6e ("powerpc/powernv/idle: Restore SPRs for deep idle
>> > states via stop API.") uses stop-api provided by the firmware to restore
>> > PSSCR. PSSCR restore is required for handling special wakeup. When special
>> > wakeup is completed, the core enters stop state based on restored PSSCR.
>> >
>> > Currently PSSCR is restored to deepest available stop state, causing
>> > a idle cpu to enter deeper stop state on a special wakeup, which causes
>> > the cpu to hang on wakeup.
>> >
>> > A "sensors" command which reads temperature (through DTS sensors) on idle
>> > cpu can trigger special wakeup.
>> >
>> > Failed Scenario :
>> > Request restore of PSSCR with RL = 11
>> > cpu enters idle state (stop5)
>> > user triggers "sensors" command
>> > Assert special wakeup on cpu
>> > Restores PSSCR with RL = 11 <---- Done by firmware
>> > Read DTS sensor
>> > Deassert special wakeup
>> > cpu enters idle state (stop11) <-- Instead of stop5
>> >
>> > Cpu hang is caused because cpu ended up in a deeper state than it requested
>> >
>> > This patch fixes instability caused by special wakeup when stop11 is
>> > enabled. Requests restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state used by cpuidle.
>> > Only when offlining cpu, request restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state.
>> > On onlining cpu, request restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state used by
>> > cpuidle.
>> >
>> > Fixes : 1e1601b38e6e ("powerpc/powernv/idle: Restore SPRs for deep idle
>> > states via stop API.")
>>
>> This should CC stable ?
>>
>> We'll need this to enable stop11 in firmware and not break things, right?
>
> Yes I will resend and CC it to stable.

That's not how patches get to stable.

You tag it with "Cc: stable@vger ...", you don't actually email it to
[email protected].

cheers

2018-03-01 01:45:56

by Michael Ellerman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle/powernv : Restore different PSSCR for idle and hotplug

Stewart Smith <[email protected]> writes:

> Akshay Adiga <[email protected]> writes:
>> commit 1e1601b38e6e ("powerpc/powernv/idle: Restore SPRs for deep idle
>> states via stop API.") uses stop-api provided by the firmware to restore
>> PSSCR. PSSCR restore is required for handling special wakeup. When special
>> wakeup is completed, the core enters stop state based on restored PSSCR.
>>
>> Currently PSSCR is restored to deepest available stop state, causing
>> a idle cpu to enter deeper stop state on a special wakeup, which causes
>> the cpu to hang on wakeup.
>>
>> A "sensors" command which reads temperature (through DTS sensors) on idle
>> cpu can trigger special wakeup.
>>
>> Failed Scenario :
>> Request restore of PSSCR with RL = 11
>> cpu enters idle state (stop5)
>> user triggers "sensors" command
>> Assert special wakeup on cpu
>> Restores PSSCR with RL = 11 <---- Done by firmware
>> Read DTS sensor
>> Deassert special wakeup
>> cpu enters idle state (stop11) <-- Instead of stop5
>>
>> Cpu hang is caused because cpu ended up in a deeper state than it requested
>>
>> This patch fixes instability caused by special wakeup when stop11 is
>> enabled. Requests restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state used by cpuidle.
>> Only when offlining cpu, request restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state.
>> On onlining cpu, request restore of PSSCR to deepest stop state used by
>> cpuidle.
>>
>> Fixes : 1e1601b38e6e ("powerpc/powernv/idle: Restore SPRs for deep idle
>> states via stop API.")
>
> This should CC stable ?
>
> We'll need this to enable stop11 in firmware and not break things, right?

But is Cc'ing this to stable even sufficient to enable stop11?

If firmware starts enabling stop11 then every existing kernel will be
broken, so eg. bisecting anything prior to now will be impossible.

cheers