2022-06-27 03:52:36

by kunyu

Subject: [PATCH] sound: It seems that the code format could be cleaner

It seems that the condition statement and return statement could be
tidied up by adding blank lines.

Signed-off-by: Li kunyu <[email protected]>
---
sound/pci/emu10k1/p16v.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/emu10k1/p16v.c b/sound/pci/emu10k1/p16v.c
index 18a1b0740e6b..d594c874f61a 100644
--- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/p16v.c
+++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/p16v.c
@@ -510,7 +510,9 @@ snd_p16v_pcm_pointer_playback(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
ptr3 = snd_emu10k1_ptr20_read(emu, PLAYBACK_LIST_PTR, channel);
ptr1 = snd_emu10k1_ptr20_read(emu, PLAYBACK_POINTER, channel);
ptr4 = snd_emu10k1_ptr20_read(emu, PLAYBACK_LIST_PTR, channel);
- if (ptr3 != ptr4) ptr1 = snd_emu10k1_ptr20_read(emu, PLAYBACK_POINTER, channel);
+ if (ptr3 != ptr4)
+ ptr1 = snd_emu10k1_ptr20_read(emu, PLAYBACK_POINTER, channel);
+
ptr2 = bytes_to_frames(runtime, ptr1);
ptr2+= (ptr4 >> 3) * runtime->period_size;
ptr=ptr2;
@@ -703,9 +705,10 @@ static int snd_p16v_capture_source_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
u32 mask;
u32 source;

- val = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] ;
+ val = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
if (val > 7)
return -EINVAL;
+
change = (emu->p16v_capture_source != val);
if (change) {
emu->p16v_capture_source = val;
@@ -741,9 +744,10 @@ static int snd_p16v_capture_channel_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
int change = 0;
u32 tmp;

- val = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] ;
+ val = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
if (val > 3)
return -EINVAL;
+
change = (emu->p16v_capture_channel != val);
if (change) {
emu->p16v_capture_channel = val;
@@ -813,6 +817,7 @@ int snd_p16v_alloc_pm_buffer(struct snd_emu10k1 *emu)
emu->p16v_saved = vmalloc(array_size(NUM_CHS * 4, 0x80));
if (! emu->p16v_saved)
return -ENOMEM;
+
return 0;
}

--
2.18.2

2022-07-04 13:47:02

by Takashi Iwai

Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound: It seems that the code format could be cleaner

On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 05:25:21 +0200,
Li kunyu wrote:
>
> It seems that the condition statement and return statement could be
> tidied up by adding blank lines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li kunyu <[email protected]>

Thanks for the patch.

But in general we don't take such white-space only changes alone,
unless it's a cleanup work for the other real changes.

i.e. if you really work on the code to fix or enhance something, we
are glad to take such a white-space patch as prerequisite.


Takashi