Hi Andrew-sh.Cheng,
On 6/2/20 9:23 PM, andrew-sh.cheng wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 16:17 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Andrew-sh.Cheng,
>>
>> The exynos-bus.c used the passive governor.
>> Even if don't make the problem because DEVFREQ_PARENT_DEV is zero,
>> you need to initialize the parent_type with DEVFREQ_PARENT_DEV as following:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>> index 8fa8eb541373..1c71c47bc2ac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
>> @@ -369,6 +369,7 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init_passive(struct exynos_bus *bus,
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> passive_data->parent = parent_devfreq;
>> + passive_data->parent_type = DEVFREQ_PARENT_DEV;
>>
>> /* Add devfreq device for exynos bus with passive governor */
>> bus->devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(dev, profile, DEVFREQ_GOV_PASSIVE,
> Hi Chanwoo Choi,
> Do you just remind me to initialize it to DEVFREQ_PARENT_DEV whn use
> this governor?
Yes. This change was not included in this patchset.
> I will do it and thank you for reminding.
Thanks.
(snip)
And, this patchset doesn't include the dt-binding example
and any real example in devicetree. If possible, I recommend
you better to update dt-binding document with example.
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics