2020-06-26 00:07:46

by Atish Patra

Subject: [RFC PATCH 10/11] efi: Rename arm-init to efi-init common for all arch

arm-init is responsible for setting up efi runtime and doesn't actually
do any ARM specific stuff. RISC-V can use the same source code as it is.

Rename it to efi-init so that RISC-V can use it.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
---
drivers/firmware/efi/{arm-init.c => efi-init.c} | 0
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
rename drivers/firmware/efi/{arm-init.c => efi-init.c} (100%)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
similarity index 100%
rename from drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
rename to drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
--
2.24.0

2020-06-26 04:47:34

by Heinrich Schuchardt

Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/11] efi: Rename arm-init to efi-init common for all arch

On 6/26/20 1:45 AM, Atish Patra wrote:
> arm-init is responsible for setting up efi runtime and doesn't actually
> do any ARM specific stuff. RISC-V can use the same source code as it is.
>
> Rename it to efi-init so that RISC-V can use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/{arm-init.c => efi-init.c} | 0
> 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> rename drivers/firmware/efi/{arm-init.c => efi-init.c} (100%)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
> similarity index 100%
> rename from drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
> rename to drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
>

After each patch we should have code that builds. This helps when
bisecting. Therefore I would have expected an adjustment of
drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile in this patch and not in patch 11/11:

-arm-obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) := arm-init.o arm-runtime.o
+arm-obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) := efi-init.o arm-runtime.o

Best regards

Heinrich

2020-06-26 21:58:22

by Atish Patra

Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/11] efi: Rename arm-init to efi-init common for all arch

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:00 PM Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 6/26/20 1:45 AM, Atish Patra wrote:
> > arm-init is responsible for setting up efi runtime and doesn't actually
> > do any ARM specific stuff. RISC-V can use the same source code as it is.
> >
> > Rename it to efi-init so that RISC-V can use it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/firmware/efi/{arm-init.c => efi-init.c} | 0
> > 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > rename drivers/firmware/efi/{arm-init.c => efi-init.c} (100%)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
> > similarity index 100%
> > rename from drivers/firmware/efi/arm-init.c
> > rename to drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c
> >
>
> After each patch we should have code that builds. This helps when

Absolutely.

> bisecting. Therefore I would have expected an adjustment of
> drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile in this patch and not in patch 11/11:
>
> -arm-obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) := arm-init.o arm-runtime.o
> +arm-obj-$(CONFIG_EFI) := efi-init.o arm-runtime.o
>

I think I messed it up while rebasing. My bad. I will fix it in the
next version.

> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>


--
Regards,
Atish