On 11/15/17 9:07 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/15, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> So please, check if uprobe_init_insn() fails or not in this case. After that
>> we will know whether your patch needs the additional is_64bit_mm() check in
>> push_setup_xol_ops() or not.
>
> OK, I did the check for you.
>
> uprobe_init_insn() doesn't fail but insn_init(x86_64 => 0) parse it as
> single-byte insn with OPCODE1 == 0x41, so push_setup_xol_ops() doesn't
> need to worry about compat tasks.
>
> In short, your "V2" should be fine except you can factor out
> auprobe->push.ilen initialization (as you did in V3). Please send V4.
Thanks a lot! I am just about to use inline asm or binary rewriter to
create such a code for testing...
I will send V4 shortly.
>
> Oleg.
>
From 1584161255542027656@xxx Wed Nov 15 19:25:02 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583700940287669077
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread