2023-05-03 03:20:25

by Ding Hui

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH net v4 0/2] iavf: Fix issues when setting channels concurrency with removing

The patchset fix two issues which can be reproduced by the following script:

[root@host ~]# cat repro.sh
#!/bin/bash

pf_dbsf="0000:41:00.0"
vf0_dbsf="0000:41:02.0"
g_pids=()

function do_set_numvf()
{
echo 2 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/${pf_dbsf}/sriov_numvfs
sleep $((RANDOM%3+1))
echo 0 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/${pf_dbsf}/sriov_numvfs
sleep $((RANDOM%3+1))
}

function do_set_channel()
{
local nic=$(ls -1 --indicator-style=none /sys/bus/pci/devices/${vf0_dbsf}/net/)
[ -z "$nic" ] && { sleep $((RANDOM%3)) ; return 1; }
ifconfig $nic 192.168.18.5 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig $nic up
ethtool -L $nic combined 1
ethtool -L $nic combined 4
sleep $((RANDOM%3))
}

function on_exit()
{
local pid
for pid in "${g_pids[@]}"; do
kill -0 "$pid" &>/dev/null && kill "$pid" &>/dev/null
done
g_pids=()
}

trap "on_exit; exit" EXIT

while :; do do_set_numvf ; done &
g_pids+=($!)
while :; do do_set_channel ; done &
g_pids+=($!)

wait


Ding Hui (2):
iavf: Fix use-after-free in free_netdev
iavf: Fix out-of-bounds when setting channels on remove

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c | 4 +++-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c | 6 +-----
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--
2.17.1


2023-05-03 03:30:49

by Ding Hui

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH net v4 2/2] iavf: Fix out-of-bounds when setting channels on remove

If we set channels greater when iavf_remove, the waiting reset done
will be timeout, then returned with error but changed num_active_queues
directly, that will lead to OOB like the following logs. Because the
num_active_queues is greater than tx/rx_rings[] allocated actually.

Reproducer:

[root@host ~]# cat repro.sh
#!/bin/bash

pf_dbsf="0000:41:00.0"
vf0_dbsf="0000:41:02.0"
g_pids=()

function do_set_numvf()
{
echo 2 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/${pf_dbsf}/sriov_numvfs
sleep $((RANDOM%3+1))
echo 0 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/${pf_dbsf}/sriov_numvfs
sleep $((RANDOM%3+1))
}

function do_set_channel()
{
local nic=$(ls -1 --indicator-style=none /sys/bus/pci/devices/${vf0_dbsf}/net/)
[ -z "$nic" ] && { sleep $((RANDOM%3)) ; return 1; }
ifconfig $nic 192.168.18.5 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig $nic up
ethtool -L $nic combined 1
ethtool -L $nic combined 4
sleep $((RANDOM%3))
}

function on_exit()
{
local pid
for pid in "${g_pids[@]}"; do
kill -0 "$pid" &>/dev/null && kill "$pid" &>/dev/null
done
g_pids=()
}

trap "on_exit; exit" EXIT

while :; do do_set_numvf ; done &
g_pids+=($!)
while :; do do_set_channel ; done &
g_pids+=($!)

wait

Result:

[ 3506.152887] iavf 0000:41:02.0: Removing device
[ 3510.400799] ==================================================================
[ 3510.400820] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in iavf_free_all_tx_resources+0x156/0x160 [iavf]
[ 3510.400823] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88b6f9311008 by task repro.sh/55536
[ 3510.400823]
[ 3510.400830] CPU: 101 PID: 55536 Comm: repro.sh Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O --------- -t - 4.18.0 #1
[ 3510.400832] Hardware name: Powerleader PR2008AL/H12DSi-N6, BIOS 2.0 04/09/2021
[ 3510.400835] Call Trace:
[ 3510.400851] dump_stack+0x71/0xab
[ 3510.400860] print_address_description+0x6b/0x290
[ 3510.400865] ? iavf_free_all_tx_resources+0x156/0x160 [iavf]
[ 3510.400868] kasan_report+0x14a/0x2b0
[ 3510.400873] iavf_free_all_tx_resources+0x156/0x160 [iavf]
[ 3510.400880] iavf_remove+0x2b6/0xc70 [iavf]
[ 3510.400884] ? iavf_free_all_rx_resources+0x160/0x160 [iavf]
[ 3510.400891] ? wait_woken+0x1d0/0x1d0
[ 3510.400895] ? notifier_call_chain+0xc1/0x130
[ 3510.400903] pci_device_remove+0xa8/0x1f0
[ 3510.400910] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c6/0x460
[ 3510.400916] pci_stop_bus_device+0x101/0x150
[ 3510.400919] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0xe/0x20
[ 3510.400924] pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0x187/0x420
[ 3510.400927] ? pci_iov_add_virtfn+0xe10/0xe10
[ 3510.400929] ? pci_get_subsys+0x90/0x90
[ 3510.400932] sriov_disable+0xed/0x3e0
[ 3510.400936] ? bus_find_device+0x12d/0x1a0
[ 3510.400953] i40e_free_vfs+0x754/0x1210 [i40e]
[ 3510.400966] ? i40e_reset_all_vfs+0x880/0x880 [i40e]
[ 3510.400968] ? pci_get_device+0x7c/0x90
[ 3510.400970] ? pci_get_subsys+0x90/0x90
[ 3510.400982] ? pci_vfs_assigned.part.7+0x144/0x210
[ 3510.400987] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
[ 3510.400996] i40e_pci_sriov_configure+0x1fa/0x2e0 [i40e]
[ 3510.401001] sriov_numvfs_store+0x214/0x290
[ 3510.401005] ? sriov_totalvfs_show+0x30/0x30
[ 3510.401007] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
[ 3510.401011] ? __check_object_size+0x15a/0x350
[ 3510.401018] kernfs_fop_write+0x280/0x3f0
[ 3510.401022] vfs_write+0x145/0x440
[ 3510.401025] ksys_write+0xab/0x160
[ 3510.401028] ? __ia32_sys_read+0xb0/0xb0
[ 3510.401031] ? fput_many+0x1a/0x120
[ 3510.401032] ? filp_close+0xf0/0x130
[ 3510.401038] do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x370
[ 3510.401041] ? page_fault+0x8/0x30
[ 3510.401043] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
[ 3510.401073] RIP: 0033:0x7f3a9bb842c0
[ 3510.401079] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d d8 cb 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 89 24 2d 00 00 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 fe dd 01 00 48 89 04 24
[ 3510.401080] RSP: 002b:00007ffc05f1fe18 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[ 3510.401083] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007f3a9bb842c0
[ 3510.401085] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000002327408 RDI: 0000000000000001
[ 3510.401086] RBP: 0000000002327408 R08: 00007f3a9be53780 R09: 00007f3a9c8a4700
[ 3510.401086] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
[ 3510.401087] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f3a9be52620 R15: 0000000000000001
[ 3510.401090]
[ 3510.401093] Allocated by task 76795:
[ 3510.401098] kasan_kmalloc+0xa6/0xd0
[ 3510.401099] __kmalloc+0xfb/0x200
[ 3510.401104] iavf_init_interrupt_scheme+0x26f/0x1310 [iavf]
[ 3510.401108] iavf_watchdog_task+0x1d58/0x4050 [iavf]
[ 3510.401114] process_one_work+0x56a/0x11f0
[ 3510.401115] worker_thread+0x8f/0xf40
[ 3510.401117] kthread+0x2a0/0x390
[ 3510.401119] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
[ 3510.401122] 0xffffffffffffffff
[ 3510.401123]

If we detected removing is in processing, we can avoid unnecessary
waiting and return error faster.

On the other hand in timeout handling, we should keep the original
num_active_queues and reset num_req_queues to 0.

Fixes: 4e5e6b5d9d13 ("iavf: Fix return of set the new channel count")
Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <[email protected]>
Cc: Donglin Peng <[email protected]>
Cc: Huang Cun <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <[email protected]>
---
v3 to v4:
- nothing changed

v2 to v3:
- fix review tag

v1 to v2:
- add reproduction script

---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
index 6f171d1d85b7..d8a3c0cfedd0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
@@ -1857,13 +1857,15 @@ static int iavf_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
/* wait for the reset is done */
for (i = 0; i < IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT; i++) {
msleep(IAVF_RESET_WAIT_MS);
+ if (test_bit(__IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK, &adapter->crit_section))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (adapter->flags & IAVF_FLAG_RESET_PENDING)
continue;
break;
}
if (i == IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT) {
adapter->flags &= ~IAVF_FLAG_REINIT_ITR_NEEDED;
- adapter->num_active_queues = num_req;
+ adapter->num_req_queues = 0;
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}

--
2.17.1

2023-05-03 03:31:50

by Ding Hui

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH net v4 1/2] iavf: Fix use-after-free in free_netdev

We do netif_napi_add() for all allocated q_vectors[], but potentially
do netif_napi_del() for part of them, then kfree q_vectors and leave
invalid pointers at dev->napi_list.

Reproducer:

[root@host ~]# cat repro.sh
#!/bin/bash

pf_dbsf="0000:41:00.0"
vf0_dbsf="0000:41:02.0"
g_pids=()

function do_set_numvf()
{
echo 2 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/${pf_dbsf}/sriov_numvfs
sleep $((RANDOM%3+1))
echo 0 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/${pf_dbsf}/sriov_numvfs
sleep $((RANDOM%3+1))
}

function do_set_channel()
{
local nic=$(ls -1 --indicator-style=none /sys/bus/pci/devices/${vf0_dbsf}/net/)
[ -z "$nic" ] && { sleep $((RANDOM%3)) ; return 1; }
ifconfig $nic 192.168.18.5 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig $nic up
ethtool -L $nic combined 1
ethtool -L $nic combined 4
sleep $((RANDOM%3))
}

function on_exit()
{
local pid
for pid in "${g_pids[@]}"; do
kill -0 "$pid" &>/dev/null && kill "$pid" &>/dev/null
done
g_pids=()
}

trap "on_exit; exit" EXIT

while :; do do_set_numvf ; done &
g_pids+=($!)
while :; do do_set_channel ; done &
g_pids+=($!)

wait

Result:

[ 4093.900222] ==================================================================
[ 4093.900230] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in free_netdev+0x308/0x390
[ 4093.900232] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88b4dc145640 by task repro.sh/6699
[ 4093.900233]
[ 4093.900236] CPU: 10 PID: 6699 Comm: repro.sh Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O --------- -t - 4.18.0 #1
[ 4093.900238] Hardware name: Powerleader PR2008AL/H12DSi-N6, BIOS 2.0 04/09/2021
[ 4093.900239] Call Trace:
[ 4093.900244] dump_stack+0x71/0xab
[ 4093.900249] print_address_description+0x6b/0x290
[ 4093.900251] ? free_netdev+0x308/0x390
[ 4093.900252] kasan_report+0x14a/0x2b0
[ 4093.900254] free_netdev+0x308/0x390
[ 4093.900261] iavf_remove+0x825/0xd20 [iavf]
[ 4093.900265] pci_device_remove+0xa8/0x1f0
[ 4093.900268] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c6/0x460
[ 4093.900271] pci_stop_bus_device+0x101/0x150
[ 4093.900273] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0xe/0x20
[ 4093.900275] pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0x187/0x420
[ 4093.900277] ? pci_iov_add_virtfn+0xe10/0xe10
[ 4093.900278] ? pci_get_subsys+0x90/0x90
[ 4093.900280] sriov_disable+0xed/0x3e0
[ 4093.900282] ? bus_find_device+0x12d/0x1a0
[ 4093.900290] i40e_free_vfs+0x754/0x1210 [i40e]
[ 4093.900298] ? i40e_reset_all_vfs+0x880/0x880 [i40e]
[ 4093.900299] ? pci_get_device+0x7c/0x90
[ 4093.900300] ? pci_get_subsys+0x90/0x90
[ 4093.900306] ? pci_vfs_assigned.part.7+0x144/0x210
[ 4093.900309] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
[ 4093.900315] i40e_pci_sriov_configure+0x1fa/0x2e0 [i40e]
[ 4093.900318] sriov_numvfs_store+0x214/0x290
[ 4093.900320] ? sriov_totalvfs_show+0x30/0x30
[ 4093.900321] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
[ 4093.900323] ? __check_object_size+0x15a/0x350
[ 4093.900326] kernfs_fop_write+0x280/0x3f0
[ 4093.900329] vfs_write+0x145/0x440
[ 4093.900330] ksys_write+0xab/0x160
[ 4093.900332] ? __ia32_sys_read+0xb0/0xb0
[ 4093.900334] ? fput_many+0x1a/0x120
[ 4093.900335] ? filp_close+0xf0/0x130
[ 4093.900338] do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x370
[ 4093.900339] ? page_fault+0x8/0x30
[ 4093.900341] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
[ 4093.900357] RIP: 0033:0x7f16ad4d22c0
[ 4093.900359] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d d8 cb 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 89 24 2d 00 00 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 fe dd 01 00 48 89 04 24
[ 4093.900360] RSP: 002b:00007ffd6491b7f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[ 4093.900362] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007f16ad4d22c0
[ 4093.900363] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000001a41408 RDI: 0000000000000001
[ 4093.900364] RBP: 0000000001a41408 R08: 00007f16ad7a1780 R09: 00007f16ae1f2700
[ 4093.900364] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
[ 4093.900365] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f16ad7a0620 R15: 0000000000000001
[ 4093.900367]
[ 4093.900368] Allocated by task 820:
[ 4093.900371] kasan_kmalloc+0xa6/0xd0
[ 4093.900373] __kmalloc+0xfb/0x200
[ 4093.900376] iavf_init_interrupt_scheme+0x63b/0x1320 [iavf]
[ 4093.900380] iavf_watchdog_task+0x3d51/0x52c0 [iavf]
[ 4093.900382] process_one_work+0x56a/0x11f0
[ 4093.900383] worker_thread+0x8f/0xf40
[ 4093.900384] kthread+0x2a0/0x390
[ 4093.900385] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
[ 4093.900387] 0xffffffffffffffff
[ 4093.900387]
[ 4093.900388] Freed by task 6699:
[ 4093.900390] __kasan_slab_free+0x137/0x190
[ 4093.900391] kfree+0x8b/0x1b0
[ 4093.900394] iavf_free_q_vectors+0x11d/0x1a0 [iavf]
[ 4093.900397] iavf_remove+0x35a/0xd20 [iavf]
[ 4093.900399] pci_device_remove+0xa8/0x1f0
[ 4093.900400] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c6/0x460
[ 4093.900401] pci_stop_bus_device+0x101/0x150
[ 4093.900402] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0xe/0x20
[ 4093.900403] pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0x187/0x420
[ 4093.900404] sriov_disable+0xed/0x3e0
[ 4093.900409] i40e_free_vfs+0x754/0x1210 [i40e]
[ 4093.900415] i40e_pci_sriov_configure+0x1fa/0x2e0 [i40e]
[ 4093.900416] sriov_numvfs_store+0x214/0x290
[ 4093.900417] kernfs_fop_write+0x280/0x3f0
[ 4093.900418] vfs_write+0x145/0x440
[ 4093.900419] ksys_write+0xab/0x160
[ 4093.900420] do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x370
[ 4093.900421] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
[ 4093.900422] 0xffffffffffffffff
[ 4093.900422]
[ 4093.900424] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88b4dc144200
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8k of size 8192
[ 4093.900425] The buggy address is located 5184 bytes inside of
8192-byte region [ffff88b4dc144200, ffff88b4dc146200)
[ 4093.900425] The buggy address belongs to the page:
[ 4093.900427] page:ffffea00d3705000 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff88bf04415c80 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
[ 4093.900430] flags: 0x10000000008100(slab|head)
[ 4093.900433] raw: 0010000000008100 dead000000000100 dead000000000200 ffff88bf04415c80
[ 4093.900434] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000030003 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
[ 4093.900434] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
[ 4093.900435]
[ 4093.900435] Memory state around the buggy address:
[ 4093.900436] ffff88b4dc145500: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[ 4093.900437] ffff88b4dc145580: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[ 4093.900438] >ffff88b4dc145600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[ 4093.900438] ^
[ 4093.900439] ffff88b4dc145680: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[ 4093.900440] ffff88b4dc145700: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
[ 4093.900440] ==================================================================

Although the patch #2 (of 2) can avoid the issuse triggered by this
repro.sh, there still are other potential risks that if num_active_queues
is changed to less than allocated q_vectors[] by unexpected, the
mismatched netif_napi_add/del() can also cause UAF.

Since we actually call netif_napi_add() for all allocated q_vectors
unconditionally in iavf_alloc_q_vectors(), so we should fix it by
letting netif_napi_del() match to netif_napi_add().

Fixes: 5eae00c57f5e ("i40evf: main driver core")
Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <[email protected]>
Cc: Donglin Peng <[email protected]>
Cc: Huang Cun <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Madhu Chittim <[email protected]>
---
v3 to v4:
- fix typo in commit message

v2 to v3:
- fix review tag

v1 to v2:
- add Fixes: tag
- add reproduction script
- update commit message

---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
index 095201e83c9d..a57e3425f960 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
@@ -1849,19 +1849,15 @@ static int iavf_alloc_q_vectors(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
static void iavf_free_q_vectors(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
{
int q_idx, num_q_vectors;
- int napi_vectors;

if (!adapter->q_vectors)
return;

num_q_vectors = adapter->num_msix_vectors - NONQ_VECS;
- napi_vectors = adapter->num_active_queues;

for (q_idx = 0; q_idx < num_q_vectors; q_idx++) {
struct iavf_q_vector *q_vector = &adapter->q_vectors[q_idx];
-
- if (q_idx < napi_vectors)
- netif_napi_del(&q_vector->napi);
+ netif_napi_del(&q_vector->napi);
}
kfree(adapter->q_vectors);
adapter->q_vectors = NULL;
--
2.17.1

2023-05-03 08:35:19

by Leon Romanovsky

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] iavf: Fix out-of-bounds when setting channels on remove

On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 11:15:41AM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
> If we set channels greater when iavf_remove, the waiting reset done
> will be timeout, then returned with error but changed num_active_queues
> directly, that will lead to OOB like the following logs. Because the
> num_active_queues is greater than tx/rx_rings[] allocated actually.
>
> Reproducer:
>
> [root@host ~]# cat repro.sh
> #!/bin/bash
>
> pf_dbsf="0000:41:00.0"
> vf0_dbsf="0000:41:02.0"
> g_pids=()
>
> function do_set_numvf()
> {
> echo 2 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/${pf_dbsf}/sriov_numvfs
> sleep $((RANDOM%3+1))
> echo 0 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/${pf_dbsf}/sriov_numvfs
> sleep $((RANDOM%3+1))
> }
>
> function do_set_channel()
> {
> local nic=$(ls -1 --indicator-style=none /sys/bus/pci/devices/${vf0_dbsf}/net/)
> [ -z "$nic" ] && { sleep $((RANDOM%3)) ; return 1; }
> ifconfig $nic 192.168.18.5 netmask 255.255.255.0
> ifconfig $nic up
> ethtool -L $nic combined 1
> ethtool -L $nic combined 4
> sleep $((RANDOM%3))
> }
>
> function on_exit()
> {
> local pid
> for pid in "${g_pids[@]}"; do
> kill -0 "$pid" &>/dev/null && kill "$pid" &>/dev/null
> done
> g_pids=()
> }
>
> trap "on_exit; exit" EXIT
>
> while :; do do_set_numvf ; done &
> g_pids+=($!)
> while :; do do_set_channel ; done &
> g_pids+=($!)
>
> wait
>
> Result:
>
> [ 3506.152887] iavf 0000:41:02.0: Removing device
> [ 3510.400799] ==================================================================
> [ 3510.400820] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in iavf_free_all_tx_resources+0x156/0x160 [iavf]
> [ 3510.400823] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88b6f9311008 by task repro.sh/55536
> [ 3510.400823]
> [ 3510.400830] CPU: 101 PID: 55536 Comm: repro.sh Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O --------- -t - 4.18.0 #1
> [ 3510.400832] Hardware name: Powerleader PR2008AL/H12DSi-N6, BIOS 2.0 04/09/2021
> [ 3510.400835] Call Trace:
> [ 3510.400851] dump_stack+0x71/0xab
> [ 3510.400860] print_address_description+0x6b/0x290
> [ 3510.400865] ? iavf_free_all_tx_resources+0x156/0x160 [iavf]
> [ 3510.400868] kasan_report+0x14a/0x2b0
> [ 3510.400873] iavf_free_all_tx_resources+0x156/0x160 [iavf]
> [ 3510.400880] iavf_remove+0x2b6/0xc70 [iavf]
> [ 3510.400884] ? iavf_free_all_rx_resources+0x160/0x160 [iavf]
> [ 3510.400891] ? wait_woken+0x1d0/0x1d0
> [ 3510.400895] ? notifier_call_chain+0xc1/0x130
> [ 3510.400903] pci_device_remove+0xa8/0x1f0
> [ 3510.400910] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c6/0x460
> [ 3510.400916] pci_stop_bus_device+0x101/0x150
> [ 3510.400919] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0xe/0x20
> [ 3510.400924] pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0x187/0x420
> [ 3510.400927] ? pci_iov_add_virtfn+0xe10/0xe10
> [ 3510.400929] ? pci_get_subsys+0x90/0x90
> [ 3510.400932] sriov_disable+0xed/0x3e0
> [ 3510.400936] ? bus_find_device+0x12d/0x1a0
> [ 3510.400953] i40e_free_vfs+0x754/0x1210 [i40e]
> [ 3510.400966] ? i40e_reset_all_vfs+0x880/0x880 [i40e]
> [ 3510.400968] ? pci_get_device+0x7c/0x90
> [ 3510.400970] ? pci_get_subsys+0x90/0x90
> [ 3510.400982] ? pci_vfs_assigned.part.7+0x144/0x210
> [ 3510.400987] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
> [ 3510.400996] i40e_pci_sriov_configure+0x1fa/0x2e0 [i40e]
> [ 3510.401001] sriov_numvfs_store+0x214/0x290
> [ 3510.401005] ? sriov_totalvfs_show+0x30/0x30
> [ 3510.401007] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
> [ 3510.401011] ? __check_object_size+0x15a/0x350
> [ 3510.401018] kernfs_fop_write+0x280/0x3f0
> [ 3510.401022] vfs_write+0x145/0x440
> [ 3510.401025] ksys_write+0xab/0x160
> [ 3510.401028] ? __ia32_sys_read+0xb0/0xb0
> [ 3510.401031] ? fput_many+0x1a/0x120
> [ 3510.401032] ? filp_close+0xf0/0x130
> [ 3510.401038] do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x370
> [ 3510.401041] ? page_fault+0x8/0x30
> [ 3510.401043] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
> [ 3510.401073] RIP: 0033:0x7f3a9bb842c0
> [ 3510.401079] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d d8 cb 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 89 24 2d 00 00 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 fe dd 01 00 48 89 04 24
> [ 3510.401080] RSP: 002b:00007ffc05f1fe18 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> [ 3510.401083] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007f3a9bb842c0
> [ 3510.401085] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000002327408 RDI: 0000000000000001
> [ 3510.401086] RBP: 0000000002327408 R08: 00007f3a9be53780 R09: 00007f3a9c8a4700
> [ 3510.401086] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
> [ 3510.401087] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f3a9be52620 R15: 0000000000000001
> [ 3510.401090]
> [ 3510.401093] Allocated by task 76795:
> [ 3510.401098] kasan_kmalloc+0xa6/0xd0
> [ 3510.401099] __kmalloc+0xfb/0x200
> [ 3510.401104] iavf_init_interrupt_scheme+0x26f/0x1310 [iavf]
> [ 3510.401108] iavf_watchdog_task+0x1d58/0x4050 [iavf]
> [ 3510.401114] process_one_work+0x56a/0x11f0
> [ 3510.401115] worker_thread+0x8f/0xf40
> [ 3510.401117] kthread+0x2a0/0x390
> [ 3510.401119] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
> [ 3510.401122] 0xffffffffffffffff
> [ 3510.401123]
>
> If we detected removing is in processing, we can avoid unnecessary
> waiting and return error faster.
>
> On the other hand in timeout handling, we should keep the original
> num_active_queues and reset num_req_queues to 0.
>
> Fixes: 4e5e6b5d9d13 ("iavf: Fix return of set the new channel count")
> Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <[email protected]>
> Cc: Donglin Peng <[email protected]>
> Cc: Huang Cun <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <[email protected]>
> ---
> v3 to v4:
> - nothing changed
>
> v2 to v3:
> - fix review tag
>
> v1 to v2:
> - add reproduction script
>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> index 6f171d1d85b7..d8a3c0cfedd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> @@ -1857,13 +1857,15 @@ static int iavf_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
> /* wait for the reset is done */
> for (i = 0; i < IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT; i++) {
> msleep(IAVF_RESET_WAIT_MS);
> + if (test_bit(__IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK, &adapter->crit_section))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;

This makes no sense without locking as change to __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK
can happen any time.

Thanks

> if (adapter->flags & IAVF_FLAG_RESET_PENDING)
> continue;
> break;
> }
> if (i == IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT) {
> adapter->flags &= ~IAVF_FLAG_REINIT_ITR_NEEDED;
> - adapter->num_active_queues = num_req;
> + adapter->num_req_queues = 0;
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>

2023-05-03 14:13:23

by Ding Hui

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] iavf: Fix out-of-bounds when setting channels on remove

On 2023/5/3 4:24 下午, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 11:15:41AM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:

>>
>> If we detected removing is in processing, we can avoid unnecessary
>> waiting and return error faster.
>>
>> On the other hand in timeout handling, we should keep the original
>> num_active_queues and reset num_req_queues to 0.
>>
>> Fixes: 4e5e6b5d9d13 ("iavf: Fix return of set the new channel count")
>> Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Donglin Peng <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Huang Cun <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> v3 to v4:
>> - nothing changed
>>
>> v2 to v3:
>> - fix review tag
>>
>> v1 to v2:
>> - add reproduction script
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
>> index 6f171d1d85b7..d8a3c0cfedd0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
>> @@ -1857,13 +1857,15 @@ static int iavf_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
>> /* wait for the reset is done */
>> for (i = 0; i < IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT; i++) {
>> msleep(IAVF_RESET_WAIT_MS);
>> + if (test_bit(__IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK, &adapter->crit_section))
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> This makes no sense without locking as change to __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK
> can happen any time.
>

The state doesn't need to be that precise here, it is optimized only for
the fast path. During the lifecycle of the adapter, the __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK
state will only be set and not cleared.

If we didn't detect the "removing" state, we also can fallback to timeout
handling.

So I don't think the locking is necessary here, what do the maintainers
at Intel think?

> Thanks
>
>> if (adapter->flags & IAVF_FLAG_RESET_PENDING)
>> continue;
>> break;
>> }
>> if (i == IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT) {
>> adapter->flags &= ~IAVF_FLAG_REINIT_ITR_NEEDED;
>> - adapter->num_active_queues = num_req;
>> + adapter->num_req_queues = 0;
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>>
>

--
Thanks,
-dinghui

2023-05-03 16:30:37

by Leon Romanovsky

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] iavf: Fix out-of-bounds when setting channels on remove

On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 10:00:49PM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
> On 2023/5/3 4:24 下午, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 11:15:41AM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
>
> > >
> > > If we detected removing is in processing, we can avoid unnecessary
> > > waiting and return error faster.
> > >
> > > On the other hand in timeout handling, we should keep the original
> > > num_active_queues and reset num_req_queues to 0.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4e5e6b5d9d13 ("iavf: Fix return of set the new channel count")
> > > Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Donglin Peng <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Huang Cun <[email protected]>
> > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> > > Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > v3 to v4:
> > > - nothing changed
> > >
> > > v2 to v3:
> > > - fix review tag
> > >
> > > v1 to v2:
> > > - add reproduction script
> > >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c | 4 +++-
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> > > index 6f171d1d85b7..d8a3c0cfedd0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> > > @@ -1857,13 +1857,15 @@ static int iavf_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
> > > /* wait for the reset is done */
> > > for (i = 0; i < IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT; i++) {
> > > msleep(IAVF_RESET_WAIT_MS);
> > > + if (test_bit(__IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK, &adapter->crit_section))
> > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> > This makes no sense without locking as change to __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK
> > can happen any time.
> >
>
> The state doesn't need to be that precise here, it is optimized only for
> the fast path. During the lifecycle of the adapter, the __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK
> state will only be set and not cleared.
>
> If we didn't detect the "removing" state, we also can fallback to timeout
> handling.
>
> So I don't think the locking is necessary here, what do the maintainers
> at Intel think?

I'm not Intel maintainer, but your change, explanation and the following
line from your commit message aren't really aligned.

[ 3510.400799] ==================================================================
[ 3510.400820] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in iavf_free_all_tx_resources+0x156/0x160 [iavf]


>
> > Thanks
> >
> > > if (adapter->flags & IAVF_FLAG_RESET_PENDING)
> > > continue;
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > if (i == IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT) {
> > > adapter->flags &= ~IAVF_FLAG_REINIT_ITR_NEEDED;
> > > - adapter->num_active_queues = num_req;
> > > + adapter->num_req_queues = 0;
> > > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> Thanks,
> -dinghui
>
>

2023-05-03 19:28:26

by Chittim, Madhu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] iavf: Fix out-of-bounds when setting channels on remove



On 5/3/2023 9:29 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 10:00:49PM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
>> On 2023/5/3 4:24 下午, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 11:15:41AM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> If we detected removing is in processing, we can avoid unnecessary
>>>> waiting and return error faster.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand in timeout handling, we should keep the original
>>>> num_active_queues and reset num_req_queues to 0.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 4e5e6b5d9d13 ("iavf: Fix return of set the new channel count")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Donglin Peng <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Huang Cun <[email protected]>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> v3 to v4:
>>>> - nothing changed
>>>>
>>>> v2 to v3:
>>>> - fix review tag
>>>>
>>>> v1 to v2:
>>>> - add reproduction script
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c | 4 +++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
>>>> index 6f171d1d85b7..d8a3c0cfedd0 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
>>>> @@ -1857,13 +1857,15 @@ static int iavf_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
>>>> /* wait for the reset is done */
>>>> for (i = 0; i < IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT; i++) {
>>>> msleep(IAVF_RESET_WAIT_MS);
>>>> + if (test_bit(__IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK, &adapter->crit_section))
>>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>
>>> This makes no sense without locking as change to __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK
>>> can happen any time.
>>>
>>
>> The state doesn't need to be that precise here, it is optimized only for
>> the fast path. During the lifecycle of the adapter, the __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK
>> state will only be set and not cleared.
>>
>> If we didn't detect the "removing" state, we also can fallback to timeout
>> handling.
>>
>> So I don't think the locking is necessary here, what do the maintainers
>> at Intel think?
>
> I'm not Intel maintainer, but your change, explanation and the following
> line from your commit message aren't really aligned.
>
> [ 3510.400799] ==================================================================
> [ 3510.400820] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in iavf_free_all_tx_resources+0x156/0x160 [iavf]
>
>

__IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK is being set only in iavf_remove() and the above
change is ok in terms of coming out of setting channels early enough
while remove is in progress.

Reviewed-by: [email protected]

>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>> if (adapter->flags & IAVF_FLAG_RESET_PENDING)
>>>> continue;
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>> if (i == IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT) {
>>>> adapter->flags &= ~IAVF_FLAG_REINIT_ITR_NEEDED;
>>>> - adapter->num_active_queues = num_req;
>>>> + adapter->num_req_queues = 0;
>>>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>> }
>>>> --
>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> -dinghui
>>
>>

2023-05-03 19:32:50

by Ahmed Zaki

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v4 2/2] iavf: Fix out-of-bounds when setting channels on remove


On 2023-05-02 21:15, Ding Hui wrote:
> If we set channels greater when iavf_remove, the waiting reset done
> will be timeout, then returned with error but changed num_active_queues
> directly, that will lead to OOB like the following logs. Because the
> num_active_queues is greater than tx/rx_rings[] allocated actually.
>
> Reproducer:
>
> [root@host ~]# cat repro.sh
> #!/bin/bash
>
> pf_dbsf="0000:41:00.0"
> vf0_dbsf="0000:41:02.0"
> g_pids=()
>
> function do_set_numvf()
> {
> echo 2 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/${pf_dbsf}/sriov_numvfs
> sleep $((RANDOM%3+1))
> echo 0 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/${pf_dbsf}/sriov_numvfs
> sleep $((RANDOM%3+1))
> }
>
> function do_set_channel()
> {
> local nic=$(ls -1 --indicator-style=none /sys/bus/pci/devices/${vf0_dbsf}/net/)
> [ -z "$nic" ] && { sleep $((RANDOM%3)) ; return 1; }
> ifconfig $nic 192.168.18.5 netmask 255.255.255.0
> ifconfig $nic up
> ethtool -L $nic combined 1
> ethtool -L $nic combined 4
> sleep $((RANDOM%3))
> }
>
> function on_exit()
> {
> local pid
> for pid in "${g_pids[@]}"; do
> kill -0 "$pid" &>/dev/null && kill "$pid" &>/dev/null
> done
> g_pids=()
> }
>
> trap "on_exit; exit" EXIT
>
> while :; do do_set_numvf ; done &
> g_pids+=($!)
> while :; do do_set_channel ; done &
> g_pids+=($!)
>
> wait
>
> Result:
>
> [ 3506.152887] iavf 0000:41:02.0: Removing device
> [ 3510.400799] ==================================================================
> [ 3510.400820] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in iavf_free_all_tx_resources+0x156/0x160 [iavf]
> [ 3510.400823] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88b6f9311008 by task repro.sh/55536
> [ 3510.400823]
> [ 3510.400830] CPU: 101 PID: 55536 Comm: repro.sh Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O --------- -t - 4.18.0 #1
> [ 3510.400832] Hardware name: Powerleader PR2008AL/H12DSi-N6, BIOS 2.0 04/09/2021
> [ 3510.400835] Call Trace:
> [ 3510.400851] dump_stack+0x71/0xab
> [ 3510.400860] print_address_description+0x6b/0x290
> [ 3510.400865] ? iavf_free_all_tx_resources+0x156/0x160 [iavf]
> [ 3510.400868] kasan_report+0x14a/0x2b0
> [ 3510.400873] iavf_free_all_tx_resources+0x156/0x160 [iavf]
> [ 3510.400880] iavf_remove+0x2b6/0xc70 [iavf]
> [ 3510.400884] ? iavf_free_all_rx_resources+0x160/0x160 [iavf]
> [ 3510.400891] ? wait_woken+0x1d0/0x1d0
> [ 3510.400895] ? notifier_call_chain+0xc1/0x130
> [ 3510.400903] pci_device_remove+0xa8/0x1f0
> [ 3510.400910] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c6/0x460
> [ 3510.400916] pci_stop_bus_device+0x101/0x150
> [ 3510.400919] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0xe/0x20
> [ 3510.400924] pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0x187/0x420
> [ 3510.400927] ? pci_iov_add_virtfn+0xe10/0xe10
> [ 3510.400929] ? pci_get_subsys+0x90/0x90
> [ 3510.400932] sriov_disable+0xed/0x3e0
> [ 3510.400936] ? bus_find_device+0x12d/0x1a0
> [ 3510.400953] i40e_free_vfs+0x754/0x1210 [i40e]
> [ 3510.400966] ? i40e_reset_all_vfs+0x880/0x880 [i40e]
> [ 3510.400968] ? pci_get_device+0x7c/0x90
> [ 3510.400970] ? pci_get_subsys+0x90/0x90
> [ 3510.400982] ? pci_vfs_assigned.part.7+0x144/0x210
> [ 3510.400987] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
> [ 3510.400996] i40e_pci_sriov_configure+0x1fa/0x2e0 [i40e]
> [ 3510.401001] sriov_numvfs_store+0x214/0x290
> [ 3510.401005] ? sriov_totalvfs_show+0x30/0x30
> [ 3510.401007] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
> [ 3510.401011] ? __check_object_size+0x15a/0x350
> [ 3510.401018] kernfs_fop_write+0x280/0x3f0
> [ 3510.401022] vfs_write+0x145/0x440
> [ 3510.401025] ksys_write+0xab/0x160
> [ 3510.401028] ? __ia32_sys_read+0xb0/0xb0
> [ 3510.401031] ? fput_many+0x1a/0x120
> [ 3510.401032] ? filp_close+0xf0/0x130
> [ 3510.401038] do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x370
> [ 3510.401041] ? page_fault+0x8/0x30
> [ 3510.401043] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
> [ 3510.401073] RIP: 0033:0x7f3a9bb842c0
> [ 3510.401079] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d d8 cb 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 3d 89 24 2d 00 00 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 31 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 fe dd 01 00 48 89 04 24
> [ 3510.401080] RSP: 002b:00007ffc05f1fe18 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> [ 3510.401083] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007f3a9bb842c0
> [ 3510.401085] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000002327408 RDI: 0000000000000001
> [ 3510.401086] RBP: 0000000002327408 R08: 00007f3a9be53780 R09: 00007f3a9c8a4700
> [ 3510.401086] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
> [ 3510.401087] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f3a9be52620 R15: 0000000000000001
> [ 3510.401090]
> [ 3510.401093] Allocated by task 76795:
> [ 3510.401098] kasan_kmalloc+0xa6/0xd0
> [ 3510.401099] __kmalloc+0xfb/0x200
> [ 3510.401104] iavf_init_interrupt_scheme+0x26f/0x1310 [iavf]
> [ 3510.401108] iavf_watchdog_task+0x1d58/0x4050 [iavf]
> [ 3510.401114] process_one_work+0x56a/0x11f0
> [ 3510.401115] worker_thread+0x8f/0xf40
> [ 3510.401117] kthread+0x2a0/0x390
> [ 3510.401119] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
> [ 3510.401122] 0xffffffffffffffff
> [ 3510.401123]
>
> If we detected removing is in processing, we can avoid unnecessary
> waiting and return error faster.
>
> On the other hand in timeout handling, we should keep the original
> num_active_queues and reset num_req_queues to 0.
>
> Fixes: 4e5e6b5d9d13 ("iavf: Fix return of set the new channel count")
> Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <[email protected]>
> Cc: Donglin Peng <[email protected]>
> Cc: Huang Cun <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <[email protected]>
> ---
> v3 to v4:
> - nothing changed
>
> v2 to v3:
> - fix review tag
>
> v1 to v2:
> - add reproduction script
>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> index 6f171d1d85b7..d8a3c0cfedd0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> @@ -1857,13 +1857,15 @@ static int iavf_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
> /* wait for the reset is done */
> for (i = 0; i < IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT; i++) {
> msleep(IAVF_RESET_WAIT_MS);
> + if (test_bit(__IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK, &adapter->crit_section))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> if (adapter->flags & IAVF_FLAG_RESET_PENDING)
> continue;
> break;
> }
> if (i == IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT) {
> adapter->flags &= ~IAVF_FLAG_REINIT_ITR_NEEDED;
> - adapter->num_active_queues = num_req;
> + adapter->num_req_queues = 0;
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
>


Thanks.

Reviewed-by: Ahmed Zaki <[email protected]>


2023-05-04 03:02:45

by Jakub Kicinski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] iavf: Fix out-of-bounds when setting channels on remove

On Wed, 3 May 2023 11:24:58 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > + if (test_bit(__IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK, &adapter->crit_section))
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> This makes no sense without locking as change to __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK
> can happen any time.

+1, the changes look questionable to me as well.

2023-05-04 08:02:54

by Leon Romanovsky

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] iavf: Fix out-of-bounds when setting channels on remove

On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 12:22:00PM -0700, Chittim, Madhu wrote:
>
>
> On 5/3/2023 9:29 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 10:00:49PM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
> > > On 2023/5/3 4:24 下午, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 11:15:41AM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > If we detected removing is in processing, we can avoid unnecessary
> > > > > waiting and return error faster.
> > > > >
> > > > > On the other hand in timeout handling, we should keep the original
> > > > > num_active_queues and reset num_req_queues to 0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 4e5e6b5d9d13 ("iavf: Fix return of set the new channel count")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <[email protected]>
> > > > > Cc: Donglin Peng <[email protected]>
> > > > > Cc: Huang Cun <[email protected]>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <[email protected]>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > v3 to v4:
> > > > > - nothing changed
> > > > >
> > > > > v2 to v3:
> > > > > - fix review tag
> > > > >
> > > > > v1 to v2:
> > > > > - add reproduction script
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c | 4 +++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> > > > > index 6f171d1d85b7..d8a3c0cfedd0 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
> > > > > @@ -1857,13 +1857,15 @@ static int iavf_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
> > > > > /* wait for the reset is done */
> > > > > for (i = 0; i < IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT; i++) {
> > > > > msleep(IAVF_RESET_WAIT_MS);
> > > > > + if (test_bit(__IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK, &adapter->crit_section))
> > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > >
> > > > This makes no sense without locking as change to __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK
> > > > can happen any time.
> > > >
> > >
> > > The state doesn't need to be that precise here, it is optimized only for
> > > the fast path. During the lifecycle of the adapter, the __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK
> > > state will only be set and not cleared.
> > >
> > > If we didn't detect the "removing" state, we also can fallback to timeout
> > > handling.
> > >
> > > So I don't think the locking is necessary here, what do the maintainers
> > > at Intel think?
> >
> > I'm not Intel maintainer, but your change, explanation and the following
> > line from your commit message aren't really aligned.
> >
> > [ 3510.400799] ==================================================================
> > [ 3510.400820] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in iavf_free_all_tx_resources+0x156/0x160 [iavf]
> >
> >
>
> __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK is being set only in iavf_remove() and the above
> change is ok in terms of coming out of setting channels early enough while
> remove is in progress.

It is not, __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK, set bit can be changed any time during
iavf_set_channels() and if it is not, I would expect test_bit(..) placed
at the beginning of iavf_set_channels() or even earlier.

Thanks

2023-05-08 13:03:02

by Ding Hui

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] iavf: Fix out-of-bounds when setting channels on remove

On 2023/5/4 15:57, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 12:22:00PM -0700, Chittim, Madhu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/3/2023 9:29 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 10:00:49PM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
>>>> On 2023/5/3 4:24 下午, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 11:15:41AM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we detected removing is in processing, we can avoid unnecessary
>>>>>> waiting and return error faster.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the other hand in timeout handling, we should keep the original
>>>>>> num_active_queues and reset num_req_queues to 0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: 4e5e6b5d9d13 ("iavf: Fix return of set the new channel count")
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Cc: Donglin Peng <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Cc: Huang Cun <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Michal Kubiak <[email protected]>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> v3 to v4:
>>>>>> - nothing changed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v2 to v3:
>>>>>> - fix review tag
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v1 to v2:
>>>>>> - add reproduction script
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c | 4 +++-
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
>>>>>> index 6f171d1d85b7..d8a3c0cfedd0 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_ethtool.c
>>>>>> @@ -1857,13 +1857,15 @@ static int iavf_set_channels(struct net_device *netdev,
>>>>>> /* wait for the reset is done */
>>>>>> for (i = 0; i < IAVF_RESET_WAIT_COMPLETE_COUNT; i++) {
>>>>>> msleep(IAVF_RESET_WAIT_MS);
>>>>>> + if (test_bit(__IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK, &adapter->crit_section))
>>>>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>>>
>>>>> This makes no sense without locking as change to __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK
>>>>> can happen any time.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The state doesn't need to be that precise here, it is optimized only for
>>>> the fast path. During the lifecycle of the adapter, the __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK
>>>> state will only be set and not cleared.
>>>>
>>>> If we didn't detect the "removing" state, we also can fallback to timeout
>>>> handling.
>>>>
>>>> So I don't think the locking is necessary here, what do the maintainers
>>>> at Intel think?
>>>
>>> I'm not Intel maintainer, but your change, explanation and the following
>>> line from your commit message aren't really aligned.
>>>
>>> [ 3510.400799] ==================================================================
>>> [ 3510.400820] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in iavf_free_all_tx_resources+0x156/0x160 [iavf]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK is being set only in iavf_remove() and the above
>> change is ok in terms of coming out of setting channels early enough while
>> remove is in progress.
>
> It is not, __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK, set bit can be changed any time during
> iavf_set_channels() and if it is not, I would expect test_bit(..) placed
> at the beginning of iavf_set_channels() or even earlier.
>

Since we have a little dispute on __IAVF_IN_REMOVE_TASK, I'll remove the
test_bit() in v5, and remove Reviewed-by: tags of 2/2 to review again.

--
Thanks,
- Ding Hui