2022-12-15 18:39:07

by Konrad Dybcio

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add UFS nodes

On 15.12.2022 19:24, Lux Aliaga wrote:
> Adds a UFS host controller node and its corresponding PHY to
> the sm6125 platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lux Aliaga <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
> index 7e25a4f85594..22c945d5fc7a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
> @@ -508,6 +508,73 @@ sdhc_2: mmc@4784000 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> + ufs_mem_hc: ufs@4804000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,sm6125-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc", "jedec,ufs-2.0";
> + reg = <0x04804000 0x3000>, <0x04810000 0x8000>;
> + reg-names = "std", "ice";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 356 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + phys = <&ufs_mem_phy_lanes>;
> + phy-names = "ufsphy";
> + lanes-per-direction = <1>;
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
> + reset-names = "rst";
> +
> + clock-names = "core_clk",
> + "bus_aggr_clk",
> + "iface_clk",
> + "core_clk_unipro",
> + "ref_clk",
> + "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
> + "rx_lane0_sync_clk",
> + "ice_core_clk";
> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_SYS_NOC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
> + <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
> + freq-table-hz = <50000000 240000000>,
> + <0 0>,
> + <0 0>,
> + <37500000 150000000>,
> + <0 0>,
> + <0 0>,
> + <0 0>,
> + <75000000 300000000>;
> +
> + non-removable;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + ufs_mem_phy: phy@4807000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,sm6115-qmp-ufs-phy";
> + reg = <0x04807000 0x1c4>;
> +
> + power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
> +
> + clock-names = "ref", "ref_aux";
> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
> +
> + resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
> + reset-names = "ufsphy";
> + status = "disabled";
> +
> + ufs_mem_phy_lanes: lanes@4807400 {
> + reg = <0x4807400 0x098>,
> + <0x4807600 0x130>,
> + <0x4807c00 0x16c>;
> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges;
That won't compile. Properties must precede subnodes.

Konrad
> + };
> +
> usb3: usb@4ef8800 {
> compatible = "qcom,sm6125-dwc3", "qcom,dwc3";
> reg = <0x04ef8800 0x400>;

2022-12-15 19:44:35

by Lux Aliaga

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add UFS nodes

On 15/12/2022 15:28, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 15.12.2022 19:24, Lux Aliaga wrote:
>> Adds a UFS host controller node and its corresponding PHY to
>> the sm6125 platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lux Aliaga <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
>> index 7e25a4f85594..22c945d5fc7a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
>> @@ -508,6 +508,73 @@ sdhc_2: mmc@4784000 {
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>>
>> + ufs_mem_hc: ufs@4804000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,sm6125-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc", "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>> + reg = <0x04804000 0x3000>, <0x04810000 0x8000>;
>> + reg-names = "std", "ice";
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 356 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + phys = <&ufs_mem_phy_lanes>;
>> + phy-names = "ufsphy";
>> + lanes-per-direction = <1>;
>> + #reset-cells = <1>;
>> + resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
>> + reset-names = "rst";
>> +
>> + clock-names = "core_clk",
>> + "bus_aggr_clk",
>> + "iface_clk",
>> + "core_clk_unipro",
>> + "ref_clk",
>> + "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
>> + "rx_lane0_sync_clk",
>> + "ice_core_clk";
>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_SYS_NOC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
>> + <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
>> + freq-table-hz = <50000000 240000000>,
>> + <0 0>,
>> + <0 0>,
>> + <37500000 150000000>,
>> + <0 0>,
>> + <0 0>,
>> + <0 0>,
>> + <75000000 300000000>;
>> +
>> + non-removable;
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> +
>> + ufs_mem_phy: phy@4807000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,sm6115-qmp-ufs-phy";
>> + reg = <0x04807000 0x1c4>;
>> +
>> + power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
>> +
>> + clock-names = "ref", "ref_aux";
>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
>> +
>> + resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
>> + reset-names = "ufsphy";
>> + status = "disabled";
>> +
>> + ufs_mem_phy_lanes: lanes@4807400 {
>> + reg = <0x4807400 0x098>,
>> + <0x4807600 0x130>,
>> + <0x4807c00 0x16c>;
>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>> + ranges;
> That won't compile. Properties must precede subnodes.
>
> Konrad
Wait, so should I move it above the status property?

--
Lux Aliaga
https://nixgoat.me/