2020-10-27 06:56:10

by Cristian Marussi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] firmware: arm_scmi: add SCMIv3.0 Sensor notifications

Add support for new SCMIv3.0 SENSOR_UPDATE notification.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <[email protected]>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 9 ++
2 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
index 372a3592e99b..51921e279c9f 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ enum scmi_sensor_protocol_cmd {
SENSOR_LIST_UPDATE_INTERVALS = 0x8,
SENSOR_CONFIG_GET = 0x9,
SENSOR_CONFIG_SET = 0xA,
+ SENSOR_CONTINUOUS_UPDATE_NOTIFY = 0xB,
};

struct scmi_msg_resp_sensor_attributes {
@@ -133,10 +134,10 @@ struct scmi_msg_resp_sensor_list_update_intervals {
__le32 intervals[];
};

-struct scmi_msg_sensor_trip_point_notify {
+struct scmi_msg_sensor_request_notify {
__le32 id;
__le32 event_control;
-#define SENSOR_TP_NOTIFY_ALL BIT(0)
+#define SENSOR_NOTIFY_ALL BIT(0)
};

struct scmi_msg_set_sensor_trip_point {
@@ -198,6 +199,17 @@ struct scmi_sensor_trip_notify_payld {
__le32 trip_point_desc;
};

+struct scmi_msg_sensor_continuous_update_notify {
+ __le32 id;
+ __le32 event_control;
+};
+
+struct scmi_sensor_update_notify_payld {
+ __le32 agent_id;
+ __le32 sensor_id;
+ struct scmi_sensor_reading_le readings[];
+};
+
struct sensors_info {
u32 version;
int num_sensors;
@@ -563,15 +575,16 @@ static int scmi_sensor_description_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
return ret;
}

-static int scmi_sensor_trip_point_notify(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
- u32 sensor_id, bool enable)
+static inline int
+scmi_sensor_request_notify(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 sensor_id,
+ u8 message_id, bool enable)
{
int ret;
- u32 evt_cntl = enable ? SENSOR_TP_NOTIFY_ALL : 0;
+ u32 evt_cntl = enable ? SENSOR_NOTIFY_ALL : 0;
struct scmi_xfer *t;
- struct scmi_msg_sensor_trip_point_notify *cfg;
+ struct scmi_msg_sensor_request_notify *cfg;

- ret = scmi_xfer_get_init(handle, SENSOR_TRIP_POINT_NOTIFY,
+ ret = scmi_xfer_get_init(handle, message_id,
SCMI_PROTOCOL_SENSOR, sizeof(*cfg), 0, &t);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -586,6 +599,23 @@ static int scmi_sensor_trip_point_notify(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
return ret;
}

+static int scmi_sensor_trip_point_notify(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
+ u32 sensor_id, bool enable)
+{
+ return scmi_sensor_request_notify(handle, sensor_id,
+ SENSOR_TRIP_POINT_NOTIFY,
+ enable);
+}
+
+static int
+scmi_sensor_continuous_update_notify(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
+ u32 sensor_id, bool enable)
+{
+ return scmi_sensor_request_notify(handle, sensor_id,
+ SENSOR_CONTINUOUS_UPDATE_NOTIFY,
+ enable);
+}
+
static int
scmi_sensor_trip_point_config(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 sensor_id,
u8 trip_id, u64 trip_value)
@@ -837,7 +867,19 @@ static int scmi_sensor_set_notify_enabled(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
{
int ret;

- ret = scmi_sensor_trip_point_notify(handle, src_id, enable);
+ switch (evt_id) {
+ case SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_TRIP_POINT_EVENT:
+ ret = scmi_sensor_trip_point_notify(handle, src_id, enable);
+ break;
+ case SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_UPDATE:
+ ret = scmi_sensor_continuous_update_notify(handle, src_id,
+ enable);
+ break;
+ default:
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
+
if (ret)
pr_debug("FAIL_ENABLED - evt[%X] dom[%d] - ret:%d\n",
evt_id, src_id, ret);
@@ -850,20 +892,58 @@ static void *scmi_sensor_fill_custom_report(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
const void *payld, size_t payld_sz,
void *report, u32 *src_id)
{
+ void *rep = NULL;
const struct scmi_sensor_trip_notify_payld *p = payld;
struct scmi_sensor_trip_point_report *r = report;

- if (evt_id != SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_TRIP_POINT_EVENT ||
- sizeof(*p) != payld_sz)
- return NULL;
+ switch (evt_id) {
+ case SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_TRIP_POINT_EVENT:
+ {
+ if (sizeof(*p) != payld_sz)
+ break;

- r->timestamp = timestamp;
- r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
- r->sensor_id = le32_to_cpu(p->sensor_id);
- r->trip_point_desc = le32_to_cpu(p->trip_point_desc);
- *src_id = r->sensor_id;
+ r->timestamp = timestamp;
+ r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
+ r->sensor_id = le32_to_cpu(p->sensor_id);
+ r->trip_point_desc = le32_to_cpu(p->trip_point_desc);
+ *src_id = r->sensor_id;
+ rep = r;
+ break;
+ }
+ case SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_UPDATE:
+ {
+ int i;
+ struct scmi_sensor_info *s;
+ const struct scmi_sensor_update_notify_payld *p = payld;
+ struct scmi_sensor_update_report *r = report;
+ struct sensors_info *sinfo = handle->sensor_priv;
+
+ /* payld_sz is variable for this event */
+ r->sensor_id = le32_to_cpu(p->sensor_id);
+ if (r->sensor_id >= sinfo->num_sensors)
+ break;
+ r->timestamp = timestamp;
+ r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
+ s = &sinfo->sensors[r->sensor_id];
+ /*
+ * The generated report r (@struct scmi_sensor_update_report)
+ * was pre-allocated to contain up to SCMI_MAX_NUM_SENSOR_AXIS
+ * readings: here it is filled with the effective @num_axis
+ * readings defined for this sensor or 1 for scalar sensors.
+ */
+ r->readings_count = s->num_axis ?: 1;
+ for (i = 0; i < r->readings_count; i++)
+ scmi_parse_sensor_readings(&r->readings[i],
+ &p->readings[i]);
+ *src_id = r->sensor_id;
+ rep = r;
+ break;
+ }
+ default:
+ break;
+ }

- return r;
+ return rep;
}

static const struct scmi_event sensor_events[] = {
@@ -872,6 +952,16 @@ static const struct scmi_event sensor_events[] = {
.max_payld_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_sensor_trip_notify_payld),
.max_report_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_sensor_trip_point_report),
},
+ {
+ .id = SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_UPDATE,
+ .max_payld_sz =
+ sizeof(struct scmi_sensor_update_notify_payld) +
+ SCMI_MAX_NUM_SENSOR_AXIS *
+ sizeof(struct scmi_sensor_reading_le),
+ .max_report_sz = sizeof(struct scmi_sensor_update_report) +
+ SCMI_MAX_NUM_SENSOR_AXIS *
+ sizeof(struct scmi_sensor_reading),
+ },
};

static const struct scmi_event_ops sensor_event_ops = {
diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
index 6f39ffa638b7..f6f0199e85e4 100644
--- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
+++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
@@ -654,6 +654,7 @@ enum scmi_notification_events {
SCMI_EVENT_PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_CHANGED = 0x0,
SCMI_EVENT_PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_CHANGED = 0x1,
SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_TRIP_POINT_EVENT = 0x0,
+ SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_UPDATE = 0x1,
SCMI_EVENT_RESET_ISSUED = 0x0,
SCMI_EVENT_BASE_ERROR_EVENT = 0x0,
SCMI_EVENT_SYSTEM_POWER_STATE_NOTIFIER = 0x0,
@@ -695,6 +696,14 @@ struct scmi_sensor_trip_point_report {
unsigned int trip_point_desc;
};

+struct scmi_sensor_update_report {
+ ktime_t timestamp;
+ unsigned int agent_id;
+ unsigned int sensor_id;
+ unsigned int readings_count;
+ struct scmi_sensor_reading readings[];
+};
+
struct scmi_reset_issued_report {
ktime_t timestamp;
unsigned int agent_id;
--
2.17.1


2020-11-10 16:04:56

by Peter Hilber

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] firmware: arm_scmi: add SCMIv3.0 Sensor notifications

On 26.10.20 21:10, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Add support for new SCMIv3.0 SENSOR_UPDATE notification.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 9 ++
> 2 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
> index 372a3592e99b..51921e279c9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ enum scmi_sensor_protocol_cmd {
> SENSOR_LIST_UPDATE_INTERVALS = 0x8,
> SENSOR_CONFIG_GET = 0x9,
> SENSOR_CONFIG_SET = 0xA,
> + SENSOR_CONTINUOUS_UPDATE_NOTIFY = 0xB,
> };
>
> struct scmi_msg_resp_sensor_attributes {
> @@ -133,10 +134,10 @@ struct scmi_msg_resp_sensor_list_update_intervals {
> __le32 intervals[];
> };
>
> -struct scmi_msg_sensor_trip_point_notify {
> +struct scmi_msg_sensor_request_notify {
> __le32 id;
> __le32 event_control;
> -#define SENSOR_TP_NOTIFY_ALL BIT(0)
> +#define SENSOR_NOTIFY_ALL BIT(0)
> };
>
> struct scmi_msg_set_sensor_trip_point {
> @@ -198,6 +199,17 @@ struct scmi_sensor_trip_notify_payld {
> __le32 trip_point_desc;
> };
>
> +struct scmi_msg_sensor_continuous_update_notify {
> + __le32 id;
> + __le32 event_control;
> +};

This struct appears unused and redundant to struct
scmi_msg_sensor_request_notify.

[...]

> @@ -850,20 +892,58 @@ static void *scmi_sensor_fill_custom_report(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
> const void *payld, size_t payld_sz,
> void *report, u32 *src_id)
> {
> + void *rep = NULL;
> const struct scmi_sensor_trip_notify_payld *p = payld;
> struct scmi_sensor_trip_point_report *r = report;

Above two variables should be moved into the first case block.

Best regards,

Peter

>
> - if (evt_id != SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_TRIP_POINT_EVENT ||
> - sizeof(*p) != payld_sz)
> - return NULL;
> + switch (evt_id) {
> + case SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_TRIP_POINT_EVENT:
> + {
> + if (sizeof(*p) != payld_sz)
> + break;
>
> - r->timestamp = timestamp;
> - r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
> - r->sensor_id = le32_to_cpu(p->sensor_id);
> - r->trip_point_desc = le32_to_cpu(p->trip_point_desc);
> - *src_id = r->sensor_id;
> + r->timestamp = timestamp;
> + r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
> + r->sensor_id = le32_to_cpu(p->sensor_id);
> + r->trip_point_desc = le32_to_cpu(p->trip_point_desc);
> + *src_id = r->sensor_id;
> + rep = r;
> + break;
> + }
> + case SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_UPDATE:
> + {
> + int i;
> + struct scmi_sensor_info *s;
> + const struct scmi_sensor_update_notify_payld *p = payld;
> + struct scmi_sensor_update_report *r = report;
> + struct sensors_info *sinfo = handle->sensor_priv;
> +
> + /* payld_sz is variable for this event */
> + r->sensor_id = le32_to_cpu(p->sensor_id);
> + if (r->sensor_id >= sinfo->num_sensors)
> + break;
> + r->timestamp = timestamp;
> + r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
> + s = &sinfo->sensors[r->sensor_id];
> + /*
> + * The generated report r (@struct scmi_sensor_update_report)
> + * was pre-allocated to contain up to SCMI_MAX_NUM_SENSOR_AXIS
> + * readings: here it is filled with the effective @num_axis
> + * readings defined for this sensor or 1 for scalar sensors.
> + */
> + r->readings_count = s->num_axis ?: 1;
> + for (i = 0; i < r->readings_count; i++)
> + scmi_parse_sensor_readings(&r->readings[i],
> + &p->readings[i]);
> + *src_id = r->sensor_id;
> + rep = r;
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
>
> - return r;
> + return rep;
> }

2020-11-10 17:13:13

by Cristian Marussi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] firmware: arm_scmi: add SCMIv3.0 Sensor notifications

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 05:01:57PM +0100, Peter Hilber wrote:
> On 26.10.20 21:10, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > Add support for new SCMIv3.0 SENSOR_UPDATE notification.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 9 ++
> > 2 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
> > index 372a3592e99b..51921e279c9f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c
> > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ enum scmi_sensor_protocol_cmd {
> > SENSOR_LIST_UPDATE_INTERVALS = 0x8,
> > SENSOR_CONFIG_GET = 0x9,
> > SENSOR_CONFIG_SET = 0xA,
> > + SENSOR_CONTINUOUS_UPDATE_NOTIFY = 0xB,
> > };
> >
> > struct scmi_msg_resp_sensor_attributes {
> > @@ -133,10 +134,10 @@ struct scmi_msg_resp_sensor_list_update_intervals {
> > __le32 intervals[];
> > };
> >
> > -struct scmi_msg_sensor_trip_point_notify {
> > +struct scmi_msg_sensor_request_notify {
> > __le32 id;
> > __le32 event_control;
> > -#define SENSOR_TP_NOTIFY_ALL BIT(0)
> > +#define SENSOR_NOTIFY_ALL BIT(0)
> > };
> >
> > struct scmi_msg_set_sensor_trip_point {
> > @@ -198,6 +199,17 @@ struct scmi_sensor_trip_notify_payld {
> > __le32 trip_point_desc;
> > };
> >
> > +struct scmi_msg_sensor_continuous_update_notify {
> > + __le32 id;
> > + __le32 event_control;
> > +};
>
> This struct appears unused and redundant to struct
> scmi_msg_sensor_request_notify.
>

Seems so, I'll remove.

> [...]
>
> > @@ -850,20 +892,58 @@ static void *scmi_sensor_fill_custom_report(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
> > const void *payld, size_t payld_sz,
> > void *report, u32 *src_id)
> > {
> > + void *rep = NULL;
> > const struct scmi_sensor_trip_notify_payld *p = payld;
> > struct scmi_sensor_trip_point_report *r = report;
>
> Above two variables should be moved into the first case block.
>
Yes, not sure why they ended up there.

Regards

Cristian

> Best regards,
>
> Peter
>
> >
> > - if (evt_id != SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_TRIP_POINT_EVENT ||
> > - sizeof(*p) != payld_sz)
> > - return NULL;
> > + switch (evt_id) {
> > + case SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_TRIP_POINT_EVENT:
> > + {
> > + if (sizeof(*p) != payld_sz)
> > + break;
> >
> > - r->timestamp = timestamp;
> > - r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
> > - r->sensor_id = le32_to_cpu(p->sensor_id);
> > - r->trip_point_desc = le32_to_cpu(p->trip_point_desc);
> > - *src_id = r->sensor_id;
> > + r->timestamp = timestamp;
> > + r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
> > + r->sensor_id = le32_to_cpu(p->sensor_id);
> > + r->trip_point_desc = le32_to_cpu(p->trip_point_desc);
> > + *src_id = r->sensor_id;
> > + rep = r;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + case SCMI_EVENT_SENSOR_UPDATE:
> > + {
> > + int i;
> > + struct scmi_sensor_info *s;
> > + const struct scmi_sensor_update_notify_payld *p = payld;
> > + struct scmi_sensor_update_report *r = report;
> > + struct sensors_info *sinfo = handle->sensor_priv;
> > +
> > + /* payld_sz is variable for this event */
> > + r->sensor_id = le32_to_cpu(p->sensor_id);
> > + if (r->sensor_id >= sinfo->num_sensors)
> > + break;
> > + r->timestamp = timestamp;
> > + r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
> > + s = &sinfo->sensors[r->sensor_id];
> > + /*
> > + * The generated report r (@struct scmi_sensor_update_report)
> > + * was pre-allocated to contain up to SCMI_MAX_NUM_SENSOR_AXIS
> > + * readings: here it is filled with the effective @num_axis
> > + * readings defined for this sensor or 1 for scalar sensors.
> > + */
> > + r->readings_count = s->num_axis ?: 1;
> > + for (i = 0; i < r->readings_count; i++)
> > + scmi_parse_sensor_readings(&r->readings[i],
> > + &p->readings[i]);
> > + *src_id = r->sensor_id;
> > + rep = r;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + default:
> > + break;
> > + }
> >
> > - return r;
> > + return rep;
> > }
>