On 17.11.2017 19:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 09:35:51AM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>> Should this skip warning that the rebind failed if device_attach
>> is returning -EPROBE_DEFER? If I do something like 'rtcwake -m mem -s 30'
>> on a laptop I have here I will see a couple "rebind failed: -517" messages
>> as it comes back out of suspend. Since the device probe eventually happens
>> once probes are not deferred wondering if this warning this be given in that
>> case.
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
>> index 64262a9a8829..5d3408010112 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
>> @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ static void usb_rebind_intf(struct usb_interface *intf)
>> if (!intf->dev.power.is_prepared) {
>> intf->needs_binding = 0;
>> rc = device_attach(&intf->dev);
>> - if (rc < 0)
>> + if (rc < 0 && rc != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> dev_warn(&intf->dev, "rebind failed: %d\n", rc);
>> }
>> }
>
> What USB driver is returning -EPROBE_DEFER to cause this to be an issue?
> Shouldn't that really only be for "platform" drivers and the like? USB
> interface drivers should all be "self-contained" within reason.
>
I see this as well with btusb driver in resume if port was reset.
drivers/base/dd.c really_probe() returns -EPROBE_DEFER if it's called before
device_unblock_probing() is called.
drivers/base/power/main/dpm_complete() will unlock probing after it has
finished resuming all devices and called all the pm_ops .complete callbacks.
The usb_device_pm_ops .complete callback will try to rebind the interface driver
if device was reset at resume, leading to them -EPROBE_DEFER.
I guess we either need to rework a few things, or remove that warning.
-Mathias
From 1584356335180091902@xxx Fri Nov 17 23:05:44 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1584356270873252269
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread