2023-03-09 04:04:26

by Dongliang Mu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH linux-next v2 2/3] drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi: revise the comment of intel_vsec_add_aux

intel_vsec_add_aux() is resource managed including res and
feature_vsec_dev memory.

Fix this by revising the comment of intel_vsec_add_aux since res variable
will also be freed in the intel_vsec_add_aux.

Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <[email protected]>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
index 882fe5e4763f..036d0e0dba19 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
@@ -239,8 +239,8 @@ static int tpmi_create_device(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info,
/*
* intel_vsec_add_aux() is resource managed, no explicit
* delete is required on error or on module unload.
- * feature_vsec_dev memory is also freed as part of device
- * delete.
+ * feature_vsec_dev and res memory are also freed as part of
+ * device deletion.
*/
return intel_vsec_add_aux(vsec_dev->pcidev, &vsec_dev->auxdev.dev,
feature_vsec_dev, feature_id_name);
--
2.39.2



2023-03-20 10:34:40

by Hans de Goede

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v2 2/3] drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi: revise the comment of intel_vsec_add_aux

Hi,

On 3/9/23 05:01, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> intel_vsec_add_aux() is resource managed including res and
> feature_vsec_dev memory.
>
> Fix this by revising the comment of intel_vsec_add_aux since res variable
> will also be freed in the intel_vsec_add_aux.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <[email protected]>

Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans
branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans

Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.

Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be
added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
merge-window.

Regards,

Hans



> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
> index 882fe5e4763f..036d0e0dba19 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
> @@ -239,8 +239,8 @@ static int tpmi_create_device(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info,
> /*
> * intel_vsec_add_aux() is resource managed, no explicit
> * delete is required on error or on module unload.
> - * feature_vsec_dev memory is also freed as part of device
> - * delete.
> + * feature_vsec_dev and res memory are also freed as part of
> + * device deletion.
> */
> return intel_vsec_add_aux(vsec_dev->pcidev, &vsec_dev->auxdev.dev,
> feature_vsec_dev, feature_id_name);


2023-03-20 11:02:35

by Dongliang Mu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v2 2/3] drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi: revise the comment of intel_vsec_add_aux


On 2023/3/20 18:33, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/9/23 05:01, Dongliang Mu wrote:
>> intel_vsec_add_aux() is resource managed including res and
>> feature_vsec_dev memory.
>>
>> Fix this by revising the comment of intel_vsec_add_aux since res variable
>> will also be freed in the intel_vsec_add_aux.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <[email protected]>
> Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans
> branch:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans
>
> Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my
> local branch there, which might take a while.
>
> Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be
> added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
> will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
> merge-window.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans

Thanks, Hans.

Shall I send the patch related to memory leak to the mainline? The
mainline is also prone to this issue?

>
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
>> index 882fe5e4763f..036d0e0dba19 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
>> @@ -239,8 +239,8 @@ static int tpmi_create_device(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info,
>> /*
>> * intel_vsec_add_aux() is resource managed, no explicit
>> * delete is required on error or on module unload.
>> - * feature_vsec_dev memory is also freed as part of device
>> - * delete.
>> + * feature_vsec_dev and res memory are also freed as part of
>> + * device deletion.
>> */
>> return intel_vsec_add_aux(vsec_dev->pcidev, &vsec_dev->auxdev.dev,
>> feature_vsec_dev, feature_id_name);

2023-03-20 13:41:13

by Hans de Goede

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v2 2/3] drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi: revise the comment of intel_vsec_add_aux

Hi,

On 3/20/23 11:57, Dongliang Mu wrote:
>
> On 2023/3/20 18:33, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3/9/23 05:01, Dongliang Mu wrote:
>>> intel_vsec_add_aux() is resource managed including res and
>>> feature_vsec_dev memory.
>>>
>>> Fix this by revising the comment of intel_vsec_add_aux since res variable
>>> will also be freed in the intel_vsec_add_aux.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <[email protected]>
>> Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans
>> branch:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans
>>
>> Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my
>> local branch there, which might take a while.
>>
>> Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be
>> added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
>> will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
>> merge-window.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>
> Thanks, Hans.
>
> Shall I send the patch related to memory leak to the mainline? The mainline is also prone to this issue?

There is no need for this, I have just moved these from my review-hans branch to the fixes
branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=fixes

So these will be included in my next fixes pull-req for mainline.

Regards,

Hans




>>> ---
>>>   drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c | 4 ++--
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
>>> index 882fe5e4763f..036d0e0dba19 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c
>>> @@ -239,8 +239,8 @@ static int tpmi_create_device(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info,
>>>       /*
>>>        * intel_vsec_add_aux() is resource managed, no explicit
>>>        * delete is required on error or on module unload.
>>> -     * feature_vsec_dev memory is also freed as part of device
>>> -     * delete.
>>> +     * feature_vsec_dev and res memory are also freed as part of
>>> +     * device deletion.
>>>        */
>>>       return intel_vsec_add_aux(vsec_dev->pcidev, &vsec_dev->auxdev.dev,
>>>                     feature_vsec_dev, feature_id_name);
>