2021-11-24 14:29:50

by Arnd Bergmann

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] futex: Wireup futex_waitv syscall

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM André Almeida <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Wireup futex_waitv syscall for all remaining archs.
>
> Signed-off-by: André Almeida <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

I double-checked that futex_waitv() doesn't need any architecture specific
hacks, and that the list above is complete.

Should I take this through the asm-generic tree, or would you send it
through the
tip tree?

Arnd

2021-11-24 15:56:29

by André Almeida

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] futex: Wireup futex_waitv syscall

Às 11:29 de 24/11/21, Arnd Bergmann escreveu:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM André Almeida <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Wireup futex_waitv syscall for all remaining archs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Almeida <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>
> I double-checked that futex_waitv() doesn't need any architecture specific
> hacks, and that the list above is complete.

Thanks!

>
> Should I take this through the asm-generic tree, or would you send it
> through the
> tip tree?
>
I think that adding it to asm-generic tree make sense to me.

2021-11-24 23:18:06

by Thomas Gleixner

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] futex: Wireup futex_waitv syscall

On Wed, Nov 24 2021 at 15:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM André Almeida <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Wireup futex_waitv syscall for all remaining archs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Almeida <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>
> I double-checked that futex_waitv() doesn't need any architecture specific
> hacks, and that the list above is complete.
>
> Should I take this through the asm-generic tree, or would you send it
> through the tip tree?

Feel free to pick it up.

Thanks,

tglx