Performance figures have not varied by more than 5% as compared to 2.5.63 performance
KERNEL 2.5.64
No size specified, using 252 MB
Unit information
================
File size = megabytes
Blk Size = bytes
Rate = megabytes per second
CPU% = percentage of CPU used during the test
Latency = milliseconds
Lat% = percent of requests that took longer than X seconds
CPU Eff = Rate divided by CPU% - throughput per cpu load
Sequential Reads
File Blk Num Avg Maximum Lat% Lat% CPU
Identifier Size Size Thr Rate (CPU%) Latency Latency >2s >10s Eff
---------------------------- ------ ----- --- ------ ------ --------- ----------- -------- -------- -----
2.5.64 252 4096 10 8.21 4.347% 12.487 1742.45 0.00000 0.00000 189
Random Reads
File Blk Num Avg Maximum Lat% Lat% CPU
Identifier Size Size Thr Rate (CPU%) Latency Latency >2s >10s Eff
---------------------------- ------ ----- --- ------ ------ --------- ----------- -------- -------- -----
2.5.64 252 4096 10 0.43 0.538% 254.222 1645.46 0.00000 0.00000 79
Sequential Writes
File Blk Num Avg Maximum Lat% Lat% CPU
Identifier Size Size Thr Rate (CPU%) Latency Latency >2s >10s Eff
---------------------------- ------ ----- --- ------ ------ --------- ----------- -------- -------- -----
2.5.64 252 4096 10 13.93 22.92% 5.356 26320.44 0.09220 0.00000 61
Random Writes
File Blk Num Avg Maximum Lat% Lat% CPU
Identifier Size Size Thr Rate (CPU%) Latency Latency >2s >10s Eff
---------------------------- ------ ----- --- ------ ------ --------- ----------- -------- -------- -----
2.5.64 252 4096 10 0.74 0.888% 1.491 1937.15 0.00000 0.00000 83
Thanks,
Aniruddha Marathe
WIPRO Technologies, India