2012-05-08 06:31:51

by Len Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gts and bfs fixes (v3).

Ugh.

I think instead we should go the other way
and simply delete the code
for _GTS and _BFS support.

The evidence is that while it is documented in the ACPI spec,
no OS implements it -- for when we tried it, we found some
systems that shipped AML that doesn't work.

-Len

ps. yes, we should also petition the ACPI authors
to remove _GTS and _BFS from an upcoming revision.


2012-05-08 21:33:56

by Rafael J. Wysocki

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gts and bfs fixes (v3).

On Tuesday, May 08, 2012, Len Brown wrote:
> Ugh.
>
> I think instead we should go the other way
> and simply delete the code
> for _GTS and _BFS support.
>
> The evidence is that while it is documented in the ACPI spec,
> no OS implements it -- for when we tried it, we found some
> systems that shipped AML that doesn't work.

Well, we can still remove it ...

> ps. yes, we should also petition the ACPI authors
> to remove _GTS and _BFS from an upcoming revision.

Oh, yes, I totally agree. :-)

Thanks,
Rafael

2012-05-08 21:53:59

by Moore, Robert

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] gts and bfs fixes (v3).

I opened a problem report against the spec about a month ago on this subject -- to remove _GTS and _BFS from the ACPI spec.

bob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-acpi-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Rafael J. Wysocki
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 2:39 PM
> To: Len Brown
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; Lin, Ming M; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] gts and bfs fixes (v3).
>
> On Tuesday, May 08, 2012, Len Brown wrote:
> > Ugh.
> >
> > I think instead we should go the other way and simply delete the code
> > for _GTS and _BFS support.
> >
> > The evidence is that while it is documented in the ACPI spec, no OS
> > implements it -- for when we tried it, we found some systems that
> > shipped AML that doesn't work.
>
> Well, we can still remove it ...
>
> > ps. yes, we should also petition the ACPI authors to remove _GTS and
> > _BFS from an upcoming revision.
>
> Oh, yes, I totally agree. :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi"
> in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo
> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html