2022-01-07 10:46:44

by Johnson Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add PMIC wrapper support for Mediatek MT8186 SoC IC

This series add PMIC wrapper support for Mediatek MT8186 SoC IC

Changes since v1:
- Fix the conditional logic in pwrap_probe() function.

Johnson Wang (2):
soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT8186 SoC
dt-bindings: mediatek: add compatible for MT8186 pwrap

.../bindings/soc/mediatek/pwrap.txt | 1 +
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 73 insertions(+)

--
2.18.0



2022-01-07 10:46:46

by Johnson Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: mediatek: add compatible for MT8186 pwrap

This adds dt-binding documentation of pwrap for Mediatek MT8186
SoCs Platform.

Acked-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Johnson Wang <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/pwrap.txt | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/pwrap.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/pwrap.txt
index d74a7a5ae9f2..214a34633824 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/pwrap.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/pwrap.txt
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ Required properties in pwrap device node.
"mediatek,mt8135-pwrap" for MT8135 SoCs
"mediatek,mt8173-pwrap" for MT8173 SoCs
"mediatek,mt8183-pwrap" for MT8183 SoCs
+ "mediatek,mt8186-pwrap" for MT8186 SoCs
"mediatek,mt8195-pwrap" for MT8195 SoCs
"mediatek,mt8516-pwrap" for MT8516 SoCs
- interrupts: IRQ for pwrap in SOC
--
2.18.0


2022-01-07 10:46:48

by Johnson Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT8186 SoC

MT8186 are highly integrated SoC and use PMIC_MT6366 for
power management. This patch adds pwrap master driver to
access PMIC_MT6366.

Signed-off-by: Johnson Wang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
index 952bc554f443..78866ebf7f04 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#define PWRAP_GET_WACS_REQ(x) (((x) >> 19) & 0x00000001)
#define PWRAP_STATE_SYNC_IDLE0 BIT(20)
#define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0 BIT(21)
+#define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_V2 BIT(22)
#define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE1 BIT(15)

/* macro for WACS FSM */
@@ -77,6 +78,8 @@
#define PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN BIT(3)
#define PWRAP_CAP_WDT_SRC1 BIT(4)
#define PWRAP_CAP_ARB BIT(5)
+#define PWRAP_CAP_MONITOR_V2 BIT(6)
+#define PWRAP_CAP_ARB_V2 BIT(8)

/* defines for slave device wrapper registers */
enum dew_regs {
@@ -1063,6 +1066,55 @@ static int mt8516_regs[] = {
[PWRAP_MSB_FIRST] = 0x170,
};

+static int mt8186_regs[] = {
+ [PWRAP_MUX_SEL] = 0x0,
+ [PWRAP_WRAP_EN] = 0x4,
+ [PWRAP_DIO_EN] = 0x8,
+ [PWRAP_RDDMY] = 0x20,
+ [PWRAP_CSHEXT_WRITE] = 0x24,
+ [PWRAP_CSHEXT_READ] = 0x28,
+ [PWRAP_CSLEXT_WRITE] = 0x2C,
+ [PWRAP_CSLEXT_READ] = 0x30,
+ [PWRAP_EXT_CK_WRITE] = 0x34,
+ [PWRAP_STAUPD_CTRL] = 0x3C,
+ [PWRAP_STAUPD_GRPEN] = 0x40,
+ [PWRAP_EINT_STA0_ADR] = 0x44,
+ [PWRAP_EINT_STA1_ADR] = 0x48,
+ [PWRAP_INT_CLR] = 0xC8,
+ [PWRAP_INT_FLG] = 0xC4,
+ [PWRAP_MAN_EN] = 0x7C,
+ [PWRAP_MAN_CMD] = 0x80,
+ [PWRAP_WACS0_EN] = 0x8C,
+ [PWRAP_WACS1_EN] = 0x94,
+ [PWRAP_WACS2_EN] = 0x9C,
+ [PWRAP_INIT_DONE0] = 0x90,
+ [PWRAP_INIT_DONE1] = 0x98,
+ [PWRAP_INIT_DONE2] = 0xA0,
+ [PWRAP_INT_EN] = 0xBC,
+ [PWRAP_INT1_EN] = 0xCC,
+ [PWRAP_INT1_FLG] = 0xD4,
+ [PWRAP_INT1_CLR] = 0xD8,
+ [PWRAP_TIMER_EN] = 0xF0,
+ [PWRAP_WDT_UNIT] = 0xF8,
+ [PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN] = 0xFC,
+ [PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_1] = 0x100,
+ [PWRAP_WDT_FLG] = 0x104,
+ [PWRAP_SPMINF_STA] = 0x1B4,
+ [PWRAP_DCM_EN] = 0x1EC,
+ [PWRAP_DCM_DBC_PRD] = 0x1F0,
+ [PWRAP_GPSINF_0_STA] = 0x204,
+ [PWRAP_GPSINF_1_STA] = 0x208,
+ [PWRAP_WACS0_CMD] = 0xC00,
+ [PWRAP_WACS0_RDATA] = 0xC04,
+ [PWRAP_WACS0_VLDCLR] = 0xC08,
+ [PWRAP_WACS1_CMD] = 0xC10,
+ [PWRAP_WACS1_RDATA] = 0xC14,
+ [PWRAP_WACS1_VLDCLR] = 0xC18,
+ [PWRAP_WACS2_CMD] = 0xC20,
+ [PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA] = 0xC24,
+ [PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR] = 0xC28,
+};
+
enum pmic_type {
PMIC_MT6323,
PMIC_MT6351,
@@ -1083,6 +1135,7 @@ enum pwrap_type {
PWRAP_MT8135,
PWRAP_MT8173,
PWRAP_MT8183,
+ PWRAP_MT8186,
PWRAP_MT8195,
PWRAP_MT8516,
};
@@ -1535,6 +1588,7 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
case PWRAP_MT6779:
case PWRAP_MT6797:
case PWRAP_MT8173:
+ case PWRAP_MT8186:
case PWRAP_MT8516:
pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_CIPHER_EN);
break;
@@ -2069,6 +2123,19 @@ static struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt8516 = {
.init_soc_specific = NULL,
};

+static struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt8186 = {
+ .regs = mt8186_regs,
+ .type = PWRAP_MT8186,
+ .arb_en_all = 0xfb27f,
+ .int_en_all = 0xfffffffe, /* disable WatchDog Timeout for bit 1 */
+ .int1_en_all = 0x000017ff, /* disable Matching interrupt for bit 13 */
+ .spi_w = PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE,
+ .wdt_src = PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL,
+ .caps = PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN | PWRAP_CAP_MONITOR_V2 | PWRAP_CAP_ARB_V2,
+ .init_reg_clock = pwrap_common_init_reg_clock,
+ .init_soc_specific = NULL,
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id of_pwrap_match_tbl[] = {
{
.compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-pwrap",
@@ -2097,6 +2164,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_pwrap_match_tbl[] = {
}, {
.compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-pwrap",
.data = &pwrap_mt8183,
+ }, {
+ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-pwrap",
+ .data = &pwrap_mt8186,
}, {
.compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-pwrap",
.data = &pwrap_mt8195,
@@ -2209,6 +2279,8 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

if (HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB))
mask_done = PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE1;
+ else if (HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB_V2))
+ mask_done = PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_V2;
else
mask_done = PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0;

--
2.18.0


Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT8186 SoC

Il 07/01/22 11:46, Johnson Wang ha scritto:
> MT8186 are highly integrated SoC and use PMIC_MT6366 for
> power management. This patch adds pwrap master driver to
> access PMIC_MT6366.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johnson Wang <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>


2022-01-12 01:49:12

by Rob Herring (Arm)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: mediatek: add compatible for MT8186 pwrap

On Fri, 07 Jan 2022 18:46:33 +0800, Johnson Wang wrote:
> This adds dt-binding documentation of pwrap for Mediatek MT8186
> SoCs Platform.
>
> Acked-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Johnson Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/pwrap.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>

Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>

2022-01-14 22:46:22

by Matthias Brugger

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT8186 SoC

Hi Johnson,

It looks like my review from a few minutes got lost, so here again:

On 07/01/2022 11:46, Johnson Wang wrote:
> MT8186 are highly integrated SoC and use PMIC_MT6366 for
> power management. This patch adds pwrap master driver to
> access PMIC_MT6366.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johnson Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> index 952bc554f443..78866ebf7f04 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #define PWRAP_GET_WACS_REQ(x) (((x) >> 19) & 0x00000001)
> #define PWRAP_STATE_SYNC_IDLE0 BIT(20)
> #define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0 BIT(21)
> +#define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_V2 BIT(22)

This name is rather strange. Is the reason that the datasheet names it like this?

> #define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE1 BIT(15)
>
> /* macro for WACS FSM */
> @@ -77,6 +78,8 @@
> #define PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN BIT(3)
> #define PWRAP_CAP_WDT_SRC1 BIT(4)
> #define PWRAP_CAP_ARB BIT(5)
> +#define PWRAP_CAP_MONITOR_V2 BIT(6)

Not used capability, please drop.

Regards,
Matthias

> +#define PWRAP_CAP_ARB_V2 BIT(8)
>
> /* defines for slave device wrapper registers */
> enum dew_regs {
> @@ -1063,6 +1066,55 @@ static int mt8516_regs[] = {
> [PWRAP_MSB_FIRST] = 0x170,
> };
>
> +static int mt8186_regs[] = {
> + [PWRAP_MUX_SEL] = 0x0,
> + [PWRAP_WRAP_EN] = 0x4,
> + [PWRAP_DIO_EN] = 0x8,
> + [PWRAP_RDDMY] = 0x20,
> + [PWRAP_CSHEXT_WRITE] = 0x24,
> + [PWRAP_CSHEXT_READ] = 0x28,
> + [PWRAP_CSLEXT_WRITE] = 0x2C,
> + [PWRAP_CSLEXT_READ] = 0x30,
> + [PWRAP_EXT_CK_WRITE] = 0x34,
> + [PWRAP_STAUPD_CTRL] = 0x3C,
> + [PWRAP_STAUPD_GRPEN] = 0x40,
> + [PWRAP_EINT_STA0_ADR] = 0x44,
> + [PWRAP_EINT_STA1_ADR] = 0x48,
> + [PWRAP_INT_CLR] = 0xC8,
> + [PWRAP_INT_FLG] = 0xC4,
> + [PWRAP_MAN_EN] = 0x7C,
> + [PWRAP_MAN_CMD] = 0x80,
> + [PWRAP_WACS0_EN] = 0x8C,
> + [PWRAP_WACS1_EN] = 0x94,
> + [PWRAP_WACS2_EN] = 0x9C,
> + [PWRAP_INIT_DONE0] = 0x90,
> + [PWRAP_INIT_DONE1] = 0x98,
> + [PWRAP_INIT_DONE2] = 0xA0,
> + [PWRAP_INT_EN] = 0xBC,
> + [PWRAP_INT1_EN] = 0xCC,
> + [PWRAP_INT1_FLG] = 0xD4,
> + [PWRAP_INT1_CLR] = 0xD8,
> + [PWRAP_TIMER_EN] = 0xF0,
> + [PWRAP_WDT_UNIT] = 0xF8,
> + [PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN] = 0xFC,
> + [PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_1] = 0x100,
> + [PWRAP_WDT_FLG] = 0x104,
> + [PWRAP_SPMINF_STA] = 0x1B4,
> + [PWRAP_DCM_EN] = 0x1EC,
> + [PWRAP_DCM_DBC_PRD] = 0x1F0,
> + [PWRAP_GPSINF_0_STA] = 0x204,
> + [PWRAP_GPSINF_1_STA] = 0x208,
> + [PWRAP_WACS0_CMD] = 0xC00,
> + [PWRAP_WACS0_RDATA] = 0xC04,
> + [PWRAP_WACS0_VLDCLR] = 0xC08,
> + [PWRAP_WACS1_CMD] = 0xC10,
> + [PWRAP_WACS1_RDATA] = 0xC14,
> + [PWRAP_WACS1_VLDCLR] = 0xC18,
> + [PWRAP_WACS2_CMD] = 0xC20,
> + [PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA] = 0xC24,
> + [PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR] = 0xC28,
> +};
> +
> enum pmic_type {
> PMIC_MT6323,
> PMIC_MT6351,
> @@ -1083,6 +1135,7 @@ enum pwrap_type {
> PWRAP_MT8135,
> PWRAP_MT8173,
> PWRAP_MT8183,
> + PWRAP_MT8186,
> PWRAP_MT8195,
> PWRAP_MT8516,
> };
> @@ -1535,6 +1588,7 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
> case PWRAP_MT6779:
> case PWRAP_MT6797:
> case PWRAP_MT8173:
> + case PWRAP_MT8186:
> case PWRAP_MT8516:
> pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_CIPHER_EN);
> break;
> @@ -2069,6 +2123,19 @@ static struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt8516 = {
> .init_soc_specific = NULL,
> };
>
> +static struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt8186 = {
> + .regs = mt8186_regs,
> + .type = PWRAP_MT8186,
> + .arb_en_all = 0xfb27f,
> + .int_en_all = 0xfffffffe, /* disable WatchDog Timeout for bit 1 */
> + .int1_en_all = 0x000017ff, /* disable Matching interrupt for bit 13 */
> + .spi_w = PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE,
> + .wdt_src = PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL,
> + .caps = PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN | PWRAP_CAP_MONITOR_V2 | PWRAP_CAP_ARB_V2,
> + .init_reg_clock = pwrap_common_init_reg_clock,
> + .init_soc_specific = NULL,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id of_pwrap_match_tbl[] = {
> {
> .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-pwrap",
> @@ -2097,6 +2164,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_pwrap_match_tbl[] = {
> }, {
> .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-pwrap",
> .data = &pwrap_mt8183,
> + }, {
> + .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-pwrap",
> + .data = &pwrap_mt8186,
> }, {
> .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-pwrap",
> .data = &pwrap_mt8195,
> @@ -2209,6 +2279,8 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> if (HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB))
> mask_done = PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE1;
> + else if (HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB_V2))
> + mask_done = PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_V2;
> else
> mask_done = PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0;
>
>

2022-01-17 17:08:58

by Matthias Brugger

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT8186 SoC



On 07/01/2022 11:46, Johnson Wang wrote:
> MT8186 are highly integrated SoC and use PMIC_MT6366 for
> power management. This patch adds pwrap master driver to
> access PMIC_MT6366.
>

It seems this new arbiter is significantly different from the version 1. Please
explain that in the commit message.

> Signed-off-by: Johnson Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> index 952bc554f443..78866ebf7f04 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #define PWRAP_GET_WACS_REQ(x) (((x) >> 19) & 0x00000001)
> #define PWRAP_STATE_SYNC_IDLE0 BIT(20)
> #define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0 BIT(21)
> +#define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_V2 BIT(22)

That's a strange name, does it come from the datasheet description?

> #define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE1 BIT(15)
>
> /* macro for WACS FSM */
> @@ -77,6 +78,8 @@
> #define PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN BIT(3)
> #define PWRAP_CAP_WDT_SRC1 BIT(4)
> #define PWRAP_CAP_ARB BIT(5)
> +#define PWRAP_CAP_MONITOR_V2 BIT(6)

Not used capability, please delete.


Regards,
Matthias

2022-01-20 00:52:54

by Johnson Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT8186 SoC

Hi Matthias,

On Fri, 2022-01-14 at 16:46 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 07/01/2022 11:46, Johnson Wang wrote:
> > MT8186 are highly integrated SoC and use PMIC_MT6366 for
> > power management. This patch adds pwrap master driver to
> > access PMIC_MT6366.
> >
>
> It seems this new arbiter is significantly different from the version
> 1. Please
> explain that in the commit message.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Johnson Wang <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 72
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > index 952bc554f443..78866ebf7f04 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> > #define PWRAP_GET_WACS_REQ(x) (((x) >> 19) &
> > 0x00000001)
> > #define PWRAP_STATE_SYNC_IDLE0 BIT(20)
> > #define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0 BIT(21)
> > +#define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_V2 BIT(22)
>
> That's a strange name, does it come from the datasheet description?

Thanks for your review.

No, there is only PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0 in MT8186 datasheet.
However, it's the 22nd bit in MT8186 and the 21st bit in other SoCs.
So we changed its name to avoid redefinition of PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0.

Could you give us some suggestion on proper definition naming?
Do you think PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_MT8186 will be a better choice?

>
> > #define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE1 BIT(15)
> >
> > /* macro for WACS FSM */
> > @@ -77,6 +78,8 @@
> > #define PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN BIT(3)
> > #define PWRAP_CAP_WDT_SRC1 BIT(4)
> > #define PWRAP_CAP_ARB BIT(5)
> > +#define PWRAP_CAP_MONITOR_V2 BIT(6)
>
> Not used capability, please delete.
>
>
> Regards,
> Matthias

PWRAP_CAP_MONITOR_V2 is not used right now.
We can remove it in next version.
But this capability will be added when we need it.

Thanks.

2022-01-20 10:33:40

by Matthias Brugger

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT8186 SoC



On 18/01/2022 10:25, Johnson Wang wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Fri, 2022-01-14 at 16:46 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 07/01/2022 11:46, Johnson Wang wrote:
>>> MT8186 are highly integrated SoC and use PMIC_MT6366 for
>>> power management. This patch adds pwrap master driver to
>>> access PMIC_MT6366.
>>>
>>
>> It seems this new arbiter is significantly different from the version
>> 1. Please
>> explain that in the commit message.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Johnson Wang <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 72
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> index 952bc554f443..78866ebf7f04 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
>>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>>> #define PWRAP_GET_WACS_REQ(x) (((x) >> 19) &
>>> 0x00000001)
>>> #define PWRAP_STATE_SYNC_IDLE0 BIT(20)
>>> #define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0 BIT(21)
>>> +#define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_V2 BIT(22)
>>
>> That's a strange name, does it come from the datasheet description?
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> No, there is only PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0 in MT8186 datasheet.
> However, it's the 22nd bit in MT8186 and the 21st bit in other SoCs.
> So we changed its name to avoid redefinition of PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0.
>
> Could you give us some suggestion on proper definition naming?
> Do you think PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_MT8186 will be a better choice?
>

Is this a difference that only will show up on the PMIC-wrapper of MT8186 or
will other SoCs include the same IP? If not, then PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_MT8186
should be fine. Otherwise we would need a better name.

>>
>>> #define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE1 BIT(15)
>>>
>>> /* macro for WACS FSM */
>>> @@ -77,6 +78,8 @@
>>> #define PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN BIT(3)
>>> #define PWRAP_CAP_WDT_SRC1 BIT(4)
>>> #define PWRAP_CAP_ARB BIT(5)
>>> +#define PWRAP_CAP_MONITOR_V2 BIT(6)
>>
>> Not used capability, please delete.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>
> PWRAP_CAP_MONITOR_V2 is not used right now.
> We can remove it in next version.
> But this capability will be added when we need it.
>

That's OK, we should add capability definitions once they are added to the
driver, not before that.

Thanks,
Matthias

2022-01-25 17:30:53

by Johnson Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT8186 SoC

Hi Matthias,

On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 14:17 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 18/01/2022 10:25, Johnson Wang wrote:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > On Fri, 2022-01-14 at 16:46 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > >
> > > On 07/01/2022 11:46, Johnson Wang wrote:
> > > > MT8186 are highly integrated SoC and use PMIC_MT6366 for
> > > > power management. This patch adds pwrap master driver to
> > > > access PMIC_MT6366.
> > > >
> > >
> > > It seems this new arbiter is significantly different from the
> > > version
> > > 1. Please
> > > explain that in the commit message.
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Johnson Wang <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 72
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > > > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > > > index 952bc554f443..78866ebf7f04 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> > > > #define PWRAP_GET_WACS_REQ(x) (((x) >> 19) &
> > > > 0x00000001)
> > > > #define PWRAP_STATE_SYNC_IDLE0 BIT(20)
> > > > #define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0 BIT(21)
> > > > +#define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_V2 BIT(22)
> > >
> > > That's a strange name, does it come from the datasheet
> > > description?
> >
> > Thanks for your review.
> >
> > No, there is only PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0 in MT8186 datasheet.
> > However, it's the 22nd bit in MT8186 and the 21st bit in other
> > SoCs.
> > So we changed its name to avoid redefinition of
> > PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0.
> >
> > Could you give us some suggestion on proper definition naming?
> > Do you think PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_MT8186 will be a better choice?
> >
>
> Is this a difference that only will show up on the PMIC-wrapper of
> MT8186 or
> will other SoCs include the same IP? If not, then
> PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_MT8186
> should be fine. Otherwise we would need a better name.
>

In fact, we don't know whether following SoCs will include
the same IP in the future.

Can we just replace _V2 with _MT8186 this time or
please give us some suggestion on it.

Thanks for your response.

> > >
> > > > #define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE1 BIT(15)
> > > >
> > > > /* macro for WACS FSM */
> > > > @@ -77,6 +78,8 @@
> > > > #define PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN BIT(3)
> > > > #define PWRAP_CAP_WDT_SRC1 BIT(4)
> > > > #define PWRAP_CAP_ARB BIT(5)
> > > > +#define PWRAP_CAP_MONITOR_V2 BIT(6)
> > >
> > > Not used capability, please delete.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> >
> > PWRAP_CAP_MONITOR_V2 is not used right now.
> > We can remove it in next version.
> > But this capability will be added when we need it.
> >
>
> That's OK, we should add capability definitions once they are added
> to the
> driver, not before that.
>
> Thanks,
> Matthias