From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <[email protected]>
[BUG]
After commit 9afc66498a0b ("btrfs: block-group: refactor how we read one
block group item"), cache->length is being assigned after calling
btrfs_create_block_group_cache. This causes a problem since
set_free_space_tree_thresholds is calculate the free-space threshould to
decide is the free-space tree should convert from extents to bitmaps.
The current code calls set_free_space_tree_thresholds with cache->length
being 0, which then makes cache->bitmap_high_thresh being zero. This
implies the system will always use bitmap instead of extents, which is
not desired if the block group is not fragmented.
This behavior can be seen by a test that expects to repair systems
with FREE_SPACE_EXTENT and FREE_SPACE_BITMAP, but the current code only
created FREE_SPACE_BITMAP.
[FIX]
Call set_free_space_tree_thresholds after setting cache->length.
Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/251
Fixes: 9afc66498a0b ("btrfs: block-group: refactor how we read one block group item")
CC: [email protected] # 5.8+
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <[email protected]>
---
fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
index 44fdfa2eeb2e..01e8ba1da1d3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -1798,7 +1798,6 @@ static struct btrfs_block_group *btrfs_create_block_group_cache(
cache->fs_info = fs_info;
cache->full_stripe_len = btrfs_full_stripe_len(fs_info, start);
- set_free_space_tree_thresholds(cache);
cache->discard_index = BTRFS_DISCARD_INDEX_UNUSED;
@@ -1908,6 +1907,8 @@ static int read_one_block_group(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
read_block_group_item(cache, path, key);
+ set_free_space_tree_thresholds(cache);
+
if (need_clear) {
/*
* When we mount with old space cache, we need to
@@ -2128,6 +2129,7 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 bytes_used,
return -ENOMEM;
cache->length = size;
+ set_free_space_tree_thresholds(cache);
cache->used = bytes_used;
cache->flags = type;
cache->last_byte_to_unpin = (u64)-1;
--
2.28.0
On 2020/8/21 上午10:42, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> From: Marcos Paulo de Souza <[email protected]>
>
> [BUG]
> After commit 9afc66498a0b ("btrfs: block-group: refactor how we read one
> block group item"), cache->length is being assigned after calling
> btrfs_create_block_group_cache. This causes a problem since
> set_free_space_tree_thresholds is calculate the free-space threshould to
> decide is the free-space tree should convert from extents to bitmaps.
>
> The current code calls set_free_space_tree_thresholds with cache->length
> being 0, which then makes cache->bitmap_high_thresh being zero. This
> implies the system will always use bitmap instead of extents, which is
> not desired if the block group is not fragmented.
>
> This behavior can be seen by a test that expects to repair systems
> with FREE_SPACE_EXTENT and FREE_SPACE_BITMAP, but the current code only
> created FREE_SPACE_BITMAP.
>
> [FIX]
> Call set_free_space_tree_thresholds after setting cache->length.
>
> Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/251
> Fixes: 9afc66498a0b ("btrfs: block-group: refactor how we read one block group item")
> CC: [email protected] # 5.8+
> Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
It would be even nicer if you could add some warning or self-test on
cache->length to prevent such problem from happening again.
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> index 44fdfa2eeb2e..01e8ba1da1d3 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> @@ -1798,7 +1798,6 @@ static struct btrfs_block_group *btrfs_create_block_group_cache(
>
> cache->fs_info = fs_info;
> cache->full_stripe_len = btrfs_full_stripe_len(fs_info, start);
> - set_free_space_tree_thresholds(cache);
>
> cache->discard_index = BTRFS_DISCARD_INDEX_UNUSED;
>
> @@ -1908,6 +1907,8 @@ static int read_one_block_group(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
>
> read_block_group_item(cache, path, key);
>
> + set_free_space_tree_thresholds(cache);
> +
> if (need_clear) {
> /*
> * When we mount with old space cache, we need to
> @@ -2128,6 +2129,7 @@ int btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 bytes_used,
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> cache->length = size;
> + set_free_space_tree_thresholds(cache);
> cache->used = bytes_used;
> cache->flags = type;
> cache->last_byte_to_unpin = (u64)-1;
>