2021-03-19 22:19:25

by Bhaskar Chowdhury

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Couple of spelling fixes


s/purpuse/purpose/
s/seperately/separately/

Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>
---
ipc/sem.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index f6c30a85dadf..780d75eff8c6 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static inline void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(struct sem_queue *q, int error,
{
get_task_struct(q->sleeper);

- /* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpuse/pairing */
+ /* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpose/pairing */
smp_store_release(&q->status, error);

wake_q_add_safe(wake_q, q->sleeper);
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static inline int check_restart(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q)

/* It is impossible that someone waits for the new value:
* - complex operations always restart.
- * - wait-for-zero are handled seperately.
+ * - wait-for-zero are handled separately.
* - q is a previously sleeping simple operation that
* altered the array. It must be a decrement, because
* simple increments never sleep.
--
2.26.2


2021-03-20 01:32:01

by Randy Dunlap

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Couple of spelling fixes



On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:

>
> s/purpuse/purpose/
> s/seperately/separately/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>


> ---
> ipc/sem.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
> index f6c30a85dadf..780d75eff8c6 100644
> --- a/ipc/sem.c
> +++ b/ipc/sem.c
> @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static inline void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(struct sem_queue *q, int error,
> {
> get_task_struct(q->sleeper);
>
> - /* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpuse/pairing */
> + /* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpose/pairing */
> smp_store_release(&q->status, error);
>
> wake_q_add_safe(wake_q, q->sleeper);
> @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static inline int check_restart(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q)
>
> /* It is impossible that someone waits for the new value:
> * - complex operations always restart.
> - * - wait-for-zero are handled seperately.
> + * - wait-for-zero are handled separately.
> * - q is a previously sleeping simple operation that
> * altered the array. It must be a decrement, because
> * simple increments never sleep.
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>