From: ZhangPeng <[email protected]>
The type of a->key[0] is char in fscache_volume_same(). If the length of
cache volume key is greater than 127, the value of a->key[0] is less than
0. In this case, klen becomes much larger than 255 after type conversion,
because the type of klen is size_t. As a result, memcmp() is read out of
bounds.
This causes a slab-out-of-bounds Read in __fscache_acquire_volume(), as
reported by Syzbot.
Fix this by changing the type of the stored key to "u8 *" rather than "char
*" (it isn't a simple string anyway). Also put in a check that the volume
name doesn't exceed NAME_MAX.
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in memcmp+0x16f/0x1c0 lib/string.c:757
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888016f3aa90 by task syz-executor344/3613
CPU: 0 PID: 3613 Comm: syz-executor344 Not tainted
6.0.0-rc2-syzkaller-00327-g8379c0b31fbc #0
Hardware name: Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
Google 07/22/2022
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:317 [inline]
print_report.cold+0x2ba/0x719 mm/kasan/report.c:433
kasan_report+0xb1/0x1e0 mm/kasan/report.c:495
memcmp+0x16f/0x1c0 lib/string.c:757
memcmp include/linux/fortify-string.h:420 [inline]
fscache_volume_same fs/fscache/volume.c:133 [inline]
fscache_hash_volume fs/fscache/volume.c:171 [inline]
__fscache_acquire_volume+0x76c/0x1080 fs/fscache/volume.c:328
fscache_acquire_volume include/linux/fscache.h:204 [inline]
v9fs_cache_session_get_cookie+0x143/0x240 fs/9p/cache.c:34
v9fs_session_init+0x1166/0x1810 fs/9p/v9fs.c:473
v9fs_mount+0xba/0xc90 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:126
legacy_get_tree+0x105/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:610
vfs_get_tree+0x89/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1530
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3040 [inline]
path_mount+0x1326/0x1e20 fs/namespace.c:3370
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
__x64_sys_mount+0x27f/0x300 fs/namespace.c:3568
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f7d5064b1d9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89
f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffd1700c028 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd1700c060 RCX: 00007f7d5064b1d9
RDX: 0000000020000040 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000020000200 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffd1700c04c R15: 00007ffd1700c050
==================================================================
Fixes: 62ab63352350 ("fscache: Implement volume registration")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
cc: Peng Zhang <[email protected]>
cc: Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>
cc: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
cc: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/ # Zhang Peng's v1 fix
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/ # Zhang Peng's v2 fix
---
fs/fscache/volume.c | 7 +++++--
include/linux/fscache.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fscache/volume.c b/fs/fscache/volume.c
index a058e0136bfe..ab8ceddf9efa 100644
--- a/fs/fscache/volume.c
+++ b/fs/fscache/volume.c
@@ -203,7 +203,11 @@ static struct fscache_volume *fscache_alloc_volume(const char *volume_key,
struct fscache_volume *volume;
struct fscache_cache *cache;
size_t klen, hlen;
- char *key;
+ u8 *key;
+
+ klen = strlen(volume_key);
+ if (klen > NAME_MAX)
+ return NULL;
if (!coherency_data)
coherency_len = 0;
@@ -229,7 +233,6 @@ static struct fscache_volume *fscache_alloc_volume(const char *volume_key,
/* Stick the length on the front of the key and pad it out to make
* hashing easier.
*/
- klen = strlen(volume_key);
hlen = round_up(1 + klen + 1, sizeof(__le32));
key = kzalloc(hlen, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!key)
diff --git a/include/linux/fscache.h b/include/linux/fscache.h
index 36e5dd84cf59..8e312c8323a8 100644
--- a/include/linux/fscache.h
+++ b/include/linux/fscache.h
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct fscache_volume {
atomic_t n_accesses; /* Number of cache accesses in progress */
unsigned int debug_id;
unsigned int key_hash; /* Hash of key string */
- char *key; /* Volume ID, eg. "[email protected]@1234" */
+ u8 *key; /* Volume ID, eg. "[email protected]@1234" */
struct list_head proc_link; /* Link in /proc/fs/fscache/volumes */
struct hlist_bl_node hash_link; /* Link in hash table */
struct work_struct work;
On 11/17/22 11:39 PM, David Howells wrote:
> From: ZhangPeng <[email protected]>
>
> The type of a->key[0] is char in fscache_volume_same(). If the length of
> cache volume key is greater than 127, the value of a->key[0] is less than
> 0. In this case, klen becomes much larger than 255 after type conversion,
> because the type of klen is size_t. As a result, memcmp() is read out of
> bounds.
>
> This causes a slab-out-of-bounds Read in __fscache_acquire_volume(), as
> reported by Syzbot.
>
> Fix this by changing the type of the stored key to "u8 *" rather than "char
> *" (it isn't a simple string anyway). Also put in a check that the volume
> name doesn't exceed NAME_MAX.
>
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in memcmp+0x16f/0x1c0 lib/string.c:757
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff888016f3aa90 by task syz-executor344/3613
>
> CPU: 0 PID: 3613 Comm: syz-executor344 Not tainted
> 6.0.0-rc2-syzkaller-00327-g8379c0b31fbc #0
> Hardware name: Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
> Google 07/22/2022
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
> dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
> print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:317 [inline]
> print_report.cold+0x2ba/0x719 mm/kasan/report.c:433
> kasan_report+0xb1/0x1e0 mm/kasan/report.c:495
> memcmp+0x16f/0x1c0 lib/string.c:757
> memcmp include/linux/fortify-string.h:420 [inline]
> fscache_volume_same fs/fscache/volume.c:133 [inline]
> fscache_hash_volume fs/fscache/volume.c:171 [inline]
> __fscache_acquire_volume+0x76c/0x1080 fs/fscache/volume.c:328
> fscache_acquire_volume include/linux/fscache.h:204 [inline]
> v9fs_cache_session_get_cookie+0x143/0x240 fs/9p/cache.c:34
> v9fs_session_init+0x1166/0x1810 fs/9p/v9fs.c:473
> v9fs_mount+0xba/0xc90 fs/9p/vfs_super.c:126
> legacy_get_tree+0x105/0x220 fs/fs_context.c:610
> vfs_get_tree+0x89/0x2f0 fs/super.c:1530
> do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3040 [inline]
> path_mount+0x1326/0x1e20 fs/namespace.c:3370
> do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
> __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
> __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
> __x64_sys_mount+0x27f/0x300 fs/namespace.c:3568
> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
> do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> RIP: 0033:0x7f7d5064b1d9
> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89
> f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01
> f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007ffd1700c028 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd1700c060 RCX: 00007f7d5064b1d9
> RDX: 0000000020000040 RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
> RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000020000200 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffd1700c04c R15: 00007ffd1700c050
> ==================================================================
>
> Fixes: 62ab63352350 ("fscache: Implement volume registration")
> Reported-by: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
> cc: Peng Zhang <[email protected]>
> cc: Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>
> cc: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
> cc: [email protected]
> cc: [email protected]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/ # Zhang Peng's v1 fix
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/ # Zhang Peng's v2 fix
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> fs/fscache/volume.c | 7 +++++--
> include/linux/fscache.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fscache/volume.c b/fs/fscache/volume.c
> index a058e0136bfe..ab8ceddf9efa 100644
> --- a/fs/fscache/volume.c
> +++ b/fs/fscache/volume.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,11 @@ static struct fscache_volume *fscache_alloc_volume(const char *volume_key,
> struct fscache_volume *volume;
> struct fscache_cache *cache;
> size_t klen, hlen;
> - char *key;
> + u8 *key;
> +
> + klen = strlen(volume_key);
> + if (klen > NAME_MAX)
> + return NULL;
>
> if (!coherency_data)
> coherency_len = 0;
> @@ -229,7 +233,6 @@ static struct fscache_volume *fscache_alloc_volume(const char *volume_key,
> /* Stick the length on the front of the key and pad it out to make
> * hashing easier.
> */
> - klen = strlen(volume_key);
> hlen = round_up(1 + klen + 1, sizeof(__le32));
> key = kzalloc(hlen, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!key)
> diff --git a/include/linux/fscache.h b/include/linux/fscache.h
> index 36e5dd84cf59..8e312c8323a8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fscache.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fscache.h
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ struct fscache_volume {
> atomic_t n_accesses; /* Number of cache accesses in progress */
> unsigned int debug_id;
> unsigned int key_hash; /* Hash of key string */
> - char *key; /* Volume ID, eg. "[email protected]@1234" */
> + u8 *key; /* Volume ID, eg. "[email protected]@1234" */
> struct list_head proc_link; /* Link in /proc/fs/fscache/volumes */
> struct hlist_bl_node hash_link; /* Link in hash table */
> struct work_struct work;
>
>
> --
> Linux-cachefs mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
zhangpeng (AS) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for your advice. The size needs to be able to hold up to 255 to
> handle larger keys. After testing, this patch works fine.
Can I put you down as a Reviewed-by or Tested-by?
Thanks,
David