2022-11-18 19:20:20

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Convert to use software_node_register_node_group()

The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
---
drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
index 18974a72e94a..dfefe0d8aa95 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
@@ -195,6 +195,19 @@ static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_names(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
SWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NAME_FMT, 0); /* And endpoint 0 */
}

+static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
+{
+ struct software_node *nodes = sensor->swnodes;
+
+ sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID];
+ sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT];
+ sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT];
+ sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT];
+ sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT];
+ if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
+ sensor->group[SWNODE_VCM] = &nodes[SWNODE_VCM];
+}
+
static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
{
@@ -219,6 +232,8 @@ static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
nodes[SWNODE_VCM] =
NODE_VCM(cio2_vcm_types[sensor->ssdb.vcmtype - 1]);
+
+ cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(sensor);
}

static void cio2_bridge_instantiate_vcm_i2c_client(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
@@ -252,7 +267,7 @@ static void cio2_bridge_unregister_sensors(struct cio2_bridge *bridge)

for (i = 0; i < bridge->n_sensors; i++) {
sensor = &bridge->sensors[i];
- software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
+ software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
acpi_dev_put(sensor->adev);
i2c_unregister_device(sensor->vcm_i2c_client);
@@ -310,7 +325,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
cio2_bridge_create_fwnode_properties(sensor, bridge, cfg);
cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(bridge, sensor);

- ret = software_node_register_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
+ ret = software_node_register_node_group(sensor->group);
if (ret)
goto err_free_pld;

@@ -337,7 +352,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
return 0;

err_free_swnodes:
- software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
+ software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
err_free_pld:
ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
err_put_adev:
diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
index 4418cbd08208..b93b749c65bd 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
@@ -117,8 +117,9 @@ struct cio2_sensor {
struct acpi_device *adev;
struct i2c_client *vcm_i2c_client;

- /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating empty node */
- struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
+ /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating NULL */
+ const struct software_node *group[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
+ struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT];
struct cio2_node_names node_names;

struct cio2_sensor_ssdb ssdb;
--
2.35.1



2022-11-21 10:33:55

by Daniel Scally

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Convert to use software_node_register_node_group()

Morning

On 21/11/2022 10:22, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On 11/21/22 11:19, Dan Scally wrote:
>> Hi Andy
>>
>> On 18/11/2022 18:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
>>> be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>
>> Also looks good to me:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <[email protected]>
> Any chance you can also give this series a test run on an IPU3 device to
> ensure that it does not cause regressions ?


Sure, wait please...

>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>>>   drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>>>   drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h |  5 +++--
>>>   2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
>>> index 18974a72e94a..dfefe0d8aa95 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
>>> @@ -195,6 +195,19 @@ static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_names(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>>>            SWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NAME_FMT, 0); /* And endpoint 0 */
>>>   }
>>>   +static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct software_node *nodes = sensor->swnodes;
>>> +
>>> +    sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID];
>>> +    sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT];
>>> +    sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT];
>>> +    sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT];
>>> +    sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT];
>>> +    if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
>>> +        sensor->group[SWNODE_VCM] =  &nodes[SWNODE_VCM];
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
>>>                             struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>>>   {
>>> @@ -219,6 +232,8 @@ static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
>>>       if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
>>>           nodes[SWNODE_VCM] =
>>>               NODE_VCM(cio2_vcm_types[sensor->ssdb.vcmtype - 1]);
>>> +
>>> +    cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(sensor);
>>>   }
>>>     static void cio2_bridge_instantiate_vcm_i2c_client(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>>> @@ -252,7 +267,7 @@ static void cio2_bridge_unregister_sensors(struct cio2_bridge *bridge)
>>>         for (i = 0; i < bridge->n_sensors; i++) {
>>>           sensor = &bridge->sensors[i];
>>> -        software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
>>> +        software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
>>>           ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
>>>           acpi_dev_put(sensor->adev);
>>>           i2c_unregister_device(sensor->vcm_i2c_client);
>>> @@ -310,7 +325,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
>>>           cio2_bridge_create_fwnode_properties(sensor, bridge, cfg);
>>>           cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(bridge, sensor);
>>>   -        ret = software_node_register_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
>>> +        ret = software_node_register_node_group(sensor->group);
>>>           if (ret)
>>>               goto err_free_pld;
>>>   @@ -337,7 +352,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
>>>       return 0;
>>>     err_free_swnodes:
>>> -    software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
>>> +    software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
>>>   err_free_pld:
>>>       ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
>>>   err_put_adev:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
>>> index 4418cbd08208..b93b749c65bd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
>>> @@ -117,8 +117,9 @@ struct cio2_sensor {
>>>       struct acpi_device *adev;
>>>       struct i2c_client *vcm_i2c_client;
>>>   -    /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating empty node */
>>> -    struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
>>> +    /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating NULL */
>>> +    const struct software_node *group[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
>>> +    struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT];
>>>       struct cio2_node_names node_names;
>>>         struct cio2_sensor_ssdb ssdb;

2022-11-21 10:34:48

by Dan Scally

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Convert to use software_node_register_node_group()

Hi Andy

On 18/11/2022 18:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
> be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
> ---


Also looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <[email protected]>

> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> index 18974a72e94a..dfefe0d8aa95 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> @@ -195,6 +195,19 @@ static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_names(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
> SWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NAME_FMT, 0); /* And endpoint 0 */
> }
>
> +static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
> +{
> + struct software_node *nodes = sensor->swnodes;
> +
> + sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID];
> + sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT];
> + sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT];
> + sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT];
> + sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT];
> + if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
> + sensor->group[SWNODE_VCM] = &nodes[SWNODE_VCM];
> +}
> +
> static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
> struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
> {
> @@ -219,6 +232,8 @@ static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
> if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
> nodes[SWNODE_VCM] =
> NODE_VCM(cio2_vcm_types[sensor->ssdb.vcmtype - 1]);
> +
> + cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(sensor);
> }
>
> static void cio2_bridge_instantiate_vcm_i2c_client(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
> @@ -252,7 +267,7 @@ static void cio2_bridge_unregister_sensors(struct cio2_bridge *bridge)
>
> for (i = 0; i < bridge->n_sensors; i++) {
> sensor = &bridge->sensors[i];
> - software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
> + software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
> ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
> acpi_dev_put(sensor->adev);
> i2c_unregister_device(sensor->vcm_i2c_client);
> @@ -310,7 +325,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
> cio2_bridge_create_fwnode_properties(sensor, bridge, cfg);
> cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(bridge, sensor);
>
> - ret = software_node_register_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
> + ret = software_node_register_node_group(sensor->group);
> if (ret)
> goto err_free_pld;
>
> @@ -337,7 +352,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
> return 0;
>
> err_free_swnodes:
> - software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
> + software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
> err_free_pld:
> ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
> err_put_adev:
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
> index 4418cbd08208..b93b749c65bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
> @@ -117,8 +117,9 @@ struct cio2_sensor {
> struct acpi_device *adev;
> struct i2c_client *vcm_i2c_client;
>
> - /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating empty node */
> - struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
> + /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating NULL */
> + const struct software_node *group[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
> + struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT];
> struct cio2_node_names node_names;
>
> struct cio2_sensor_ssdb ssdb;

2022-11-21 10:35:23

by Hans de Goede

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Convert to use software_node_register_node_group()

Hi Dan,

On 11/21/22 11:19, Dan Scally wrote:
> Hi Andy
>
> On 18/11/2022 18:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
>> be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
>> ---
>
>
> Also looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <[email protected]>

Any chance you can also give this series a test run on an IPU3 device to
ensure that it does not cause regressions ?

Regards,

Hans



>
>>   drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>>   drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h |  5 +++--
>>   2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
>> index 18974a72e94a..dfefe0d8aa95 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
>> @@ -195,6 +195,19 @@ static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_names(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>>            SWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NAME_FMT, 0); /* And endpoint 0 */
>>   }
>>   +static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>> +{
>> +    struct software_node *nodes = sensor->swnodes;
>> +
>> +    sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID];
>> +    sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT];
>> +    sensor->group[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT];
>> +    sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT];
>> +    sensor->group[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT] = &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT];
>> +    if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
>> +        sensor->group[SWNODE_VCM] =  &nodes[SWNODE_VCM];
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
>>                             struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>>   {
>> @@ -219,6 +232,8 @@ static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
>>       if (sensor->ssdb.vcmtype)
>>           nodes[SWNODE_VCM] =
>>               NODE_VCM(cio2_vcm_types[sensor->ssdb.vcmtype - 1]);
>> +
>> +    cio2_bridge_init_swnode_group(sensor);
>>   }
>>     static void cio2_bridge_instantiate_vcm_i2c_client(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
>> @@ -252,7 +267,7 @@ static void cio2_bridge_unregister_sensors(struct cio2_bridge *bridge)
>>         for (i = 0; i < bridge->n_sensors; i++) {
>>           sensor = &bridge->sensors[i];
>> -        software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
>> +        software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
>>           ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
>>           acpi_dev_put(sensor->adev);
>>           i2c_unregister_device(sensor->vcm_i2c_client);
>> @@ -310,7 +325,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
>>           cio2_bridge_create_fwnode_properties(sensor, bridge, cfg);
>>           cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(bridge, sensor);
>>   -        ret = software_node_register_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
>> +        ret = software_node_register_node_group(sensor->group);
>>           if (ret)
>>               goto err_free_pld;
>>   @@ -337,7 +352,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
>>       return 0;
>>     err_free_swnodes:
>> -    software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
>> +    software_node_unregister_node_group(sensor->group);
>>   err_free_pld:
>>       ACPI_FREE(sensor->pld);
>>   err_put_adev:
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
>> index 4418cbd08208..b93b749c65bd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
>> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
>> @@ -117,8 +117,9 @@ struct cio2_sensor {
>>       struct acpi_device *adev;
>>       struct i2c_client *vcm_i2c_client;
>>   -    /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating empty node */
>> -    struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
>> +    /* SWNODE_COUNT + 1 for terminating NULL */
>> +    const struct software_node *group[SWNODE_COUNT + 1];
>> +    struct software_node swnodes[SWNODE_COUNT];
>>       struct cio2_node_names node_names;
>>         struct cio2_sensor_ssdb ssdb;
>


2022-11-21 11:05:28

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Convert to use software_node_register_node_group()

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 11/21/22 11:19, Dan Scally wrote:
> > On 18/11/2022 18:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
> >> be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.

> > Also looks good to me:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <[email protected]>

Thank you!

> Any chance you can also give this series a test run on an IPU3 device to
> ensure that it does not cause regressions ?

Yes, it would be really appreciated!

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



2022-11-21 16:18:12

by Hans de Goede

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Convert to use software_node_register_node_group()

Hi,

On 11/21/22 15:32, Dan Scally wrote:
> Hi Andy and Hans
>
> On 21/11/2022 10:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> On 11/21/22 11:19, Dan Scally wrote:
>>>> On 18/11/2022 18:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>> The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
>>>>> be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.
>>>> Also looks good to me:
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <[email protected]>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>> Any chance you can also give this series a test run on an IPU3 device to
>>> ensure that it does not cause regressions ?
>> Yes, it would be really appreciated!
>
> All seems fine (including the kunit test) - you can add
>
>
> Tested-by: Daniel Scally <[email protected]>

Great, thank you!

Regards,

Hans


2022-11-21 16:18:22

by Dan Scally

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Convert to use software_node_register_node_group()

Hi Andy and Hans

On 21/11/2022 10:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 11/21/22 11:19, Dan Scally wrote:
>>> On 18/11/2022 18:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> The currently used software_node_register_nodes() is going to
>>>> be removed. Prepare driver by switchich to new API.
>>> Also looks good to me:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <[email protected]>
> Thank you!
>
>> Any chance you can also give this series a test run on an IPU3 device to
>> ensure that it does not cause regressions ?
> Yes, it would be really appreciated!

All seems fine (including the kunit test) - you can add


Tested-by: Daniel Scally <[email protected]>


to the series