These tests check that the basic locked port feature works, so that no 'host'
can communicate (ping) through a locked port unless the MAC address of the
'host' interface is in the forwarding database of the bridge.
Signed-off-by: Hans Schultz <[email protected]>
---
.../testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile | 1 +
.../net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh | 174 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh | 16 ++
3 files changed, 191 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
index 72ee644d47bf..8fa97ae9af9e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ OR MIT
TEST_PROGS = bridge_igmp.sh \
+ bridge_locked_port.sh \
bridge_port_isolation.sh \
bridge_sticky_fdb.sh \
bridge_vlan_aware.sh \
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..d2805441b325
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+ALL_TESTS="locked_port_ipv4 locked_port_ipv6 locked_port_vlan"
+NUM_NETIFS=4
+CHECK_TC="no"
+source lib.sh
+
+h1_create()
+{
+ simple_if_init $h1 192.0.2.1/24 2001:db8:1::1/64
+ vrf_create "vrf-vlan-h1"
+ ip link set dev vrf-vlan-h1 up
+ vlan_create $h1 100 vrf-vlan-h1 192.0.3.1/24 2001:db8:3::1/64
+}
+
+h1_destroy()
+{
+ vlan_destroy $h1 100
+ simple_if_fini $h1 192.0.2.1/24 2001:db8:1::1/64
+}
+
+h2_create()
+{
+ simple_if_init $h2 192.0.2.2/24 2001:db8:1::2/64
+ vrf_create "vrf-vlan-h2"
+ ip link set dev vrf-vlan-h2 up
+ vlan_create $h2 100 vrf-vlan-h2 192.0.3.2/24 2001:db8:3::2/64
+}
+
+h2_destroy()
+{
+ vlan_destroy $h2 100
+ simple_if_fini $h2 192.0.2.2/24 2001:db8:1::2/64
+}
+
+switch_create()
+{
+ ip link add dev br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
+
+ ip link set dev $swp1 master br0
+ ip link set dev $swp2 master br0
+
+ ip link set dev br0 up
+ ip link set dev $swp1 up
+ ip link set dev $swp2 up
+
+ bridge link set dev $swp1 learning off
+}
+
+switch_destroy()
+{
+ ip link set dev $swp2 down
+ ip link set dev $swp1 down
+
+ ip link del dev br0
+}
+
+setup_prepare()
+{
+ h1=${NETIFS[p1]}
+ swp1=${NETIFS[p2]}
+
+ swp2=${NETIFS[p3]}
+ h2=${NETIFS[p4]}
+
+ vrf_prepare
+
+ h1_create
+ h2_create
+
+ switch_create
+}
+
+cleanup()
+{
+ pre_cleanup
+
+ switch_destroy
+
+ h2_destroy
+ h1_destroy
+
+ vrf_cleanup
+}
+
+ifaddr()
+{
+ ip -br link show dev "$1" | awk '{ print($3); }'
+}
+
+locked_port_ipv4()
+{
+ RET=0
+
+ check_locked_port_support || return 0
+
+ ping_do $h1 192.0.2.2
+ check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
+
+ bridge link set dev $swp1 locked on
+
+ ping_do $h1 192.0.2.2
+ check_fail $? "Ping worked when it should not have"
+
+ bridge fdb add `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 master static
+
+ ping_do $h1 192.0.2.2
+ check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
+
+ bridge link set dev $swp1 locked off
+ bridge fdb del `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 master static
+ log_test "Locked port ipv4"
+}
+
+locked_port_vlan()
+{
+ RET=0
+
+ check_locked_port_support || return 0
+ check_vlan_filtering_support || return 0
+
+ bridge vlan add vid 100 dev $swp1 tagged
+ bridge vlan add vid 100 dev $swp2 tagged
+
+ ping_do $h1.100 192.0.3.2
+ check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
+
+ bridge link set dev $swp1 locked on
+ ping_do $h1.100 192.0.3.2
+ check_fail $? "Ping worked when it should not have"
+
+ bridge fdb add `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 vlan 100 master static
+
+ ping_do $h1.100 192.0.3.2
+ check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
+
+ bridge link set dev $swp1 locked off
+ bridge vlan del vid 100 dev $swp1
+ bridge vlan del vid 100 dev $swp2
+ bridge fdb del `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 vlan 100 master static
+ log_test "Locked port vlan"
+}
+
+locked_port_ipv6()
+{
+ RET=0
+ check_locked_port_support || return 0
+
+ ping6_do $h1 2001:db8:1::2
+ check_err $? "Ping6 didn't work when it should have"
+
+ bridge link set dev $swp1 locked on
+
+ ping6_do $h1 2001:db8:1::2
+ check_fail $? "Ping worked when it should not have"
+
+ bridge fdb add `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 master static
+ ping6_do $h1 2001:db8:1::2
+ check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
+
+ bridge link set dev $swp1 locked off
+ bridge fdb del `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 master static
+ log_test "Locked port ipv6"
+}
+
+trap cleanup EXIT
+
+setup_prepare
+setup_wait
+
+tests_run
+
+exit $EXIT_STATUS
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh
index 7da783d6f453..9ded90f17ead 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh
@@ -125,6 +125,22 @@ check_ethtool_lanes_support()
fi
}
+check_locked_port_support()
+{
+ if ! bridge -d link show | grep -q " locked"; then
+ echo "SKIP: iproute2 too old; Locked port feature not supported."
+ return $ksft_skip
+ fi
+}
+
+check_vlan_filtering_support()
+{
+ if ! bridge -d vlan show | grep -q "state forwarding"; then
+ echo "SKIP: vlan filtering not supported."
+ return $ksft_skip
+ fi
+}
+
if [[ "$(id -u)" -ne 0 ]]; then
echo "SKIP: need root privileges"
exit $ksft_skip
--
2.30.2
On 2/18/22 8:51 AM, Hans Schultz wrote:
> These tests check that the basic locked port feature works, so that no 'host'
> can communicate (ping) through a locked port unless the MAC address of the
> 'host' interface is in the forwarding database of the bridge.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Schultz <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile | 1 +
> .../net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh | 174 ++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh | 16 ++
> 3 files changed, 191 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
> index 72ee644d47bf..8fa97ae9af9e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ OR MIT
>
> TEST_PROGS = bridge_igmp.sh \
> + bridge_locked_port.sh \
> bridge_port_isolation.sh \
> bridge_sticky_fdb.sh \
> bridge_vlan_aware.sh \
Looks good to me. Looks like TEST_PROGS # is getting close to 60.
Cool.
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
thanks,
-- Shuah
On 18/02/2022 17:51, Hans Schultz wrote:
> These tests check that the basic locked port feature works, so that no 'host'
> can communicate (ping) through a locked port unless the MAC address of the
> 'host' interface is in the forwarding database of the bridge.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Schultz <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile | 1 +
> .../net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh | 174 ++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh | 16 ++
> 3 files changed, 191 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
> index 72ee644d47bf..8fa97ae9af9e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ OR MIT
>
> TEST_PROGS = bridge_igmp.sh \
> + bridge_locked_port.sh \
> bridge_port_isolation.sh \
> bridge_sticky_fdb.sh \
> bridge_vlan_aware.sh \
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..d2805441b325
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +ALL_TESTS="locked_port_ipv4 locked_port_ipv6 locked_port_vlan"
> +NUM_NETIFS=4
> +CHECK_TC="no"
> +source lib.sh
> +
> +h1_create()
> +{
> + simple_if_init $h1 192.0.2.1/24 2001:db8:1::1/64
> + vrf_create "vrf-vlan-h1"
> + ip link set dev vrf-vlan-h1 up
> + vlan_create $h1 100 vrf-vlan-h1 192.0.3.1/24 2001:db8:3::1/64
> +}
Please use tabs similar to everywhere else in the file.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 04:51:48PM +0100, Hans Schultz wrote:
> These tests check that the basic locked port feature works, so that no 'host'
> can communicate (ping) through a locked port unless the MAC address of the
> 'host' interface is in the forwarding database of the bridge.
Thanks for adding the test. I assume this was tested with both mv88e6xxx
and veth?
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Schultz <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile | 1 +
> .../net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh | 174 ++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh | 16 ++
> 3 files changed, 191 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
> index 72ee644d47bf..8fa97ae9af9e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ OR MIT
>
> TEST_PROGS = bridge_igmp.sh \
> + bridge_locked_port.sh \
> bridge_port_isolation.sh \
> bridge_sticky_fdb.sh \
> bridge_vlan_aware.sh \
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..d2805441b325
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +ALL_TESTS="locked_port_ipv4 locked_port_ipv6 locked_port_vlan"
> +NUM_NETIFS=4
> +CHECK_TC="no"
> +source lib.sh
> +
> +h1_create()
> +{
> + simple_if_init $h1 192.0.2.1/24 2001:db8:1::1/64
> + vrf_create "vrf-vlan-h1"
> + ip link set dev vrf-vlan-h1 up
> + vlan_create $h1 100 vrf-vlan-h1 192.0.3.1/24 2001:db8:3::1/64
In the tests we try to use only addresses specified in RFC 5737. Instead
of 192.0.3.0/24 I suggest 198.51.100.0/24
> +}
> +
> +h1_destroy()
> +{
> + vlan_destroy $h1 100
> + simple_if_fini $h1 192.0.2.1/24 2001:db8:1::1/64
> +}
> +
> +h2_create()
> +{
> + simple_if_init $h2 192.0.2.2/24 2001:db8:1::2/64
> + vrf_create "vrf-vlan-h2"
> + ip link set dev vrf-vlan-h2 up
> + vlan_create $h2 100 vrf-vlan-h2 192.0.3.2/24 2001:db8:3::2/64
> +}
> +
> +h2_destroy()
> +{
> + vlan_destroy $h2 100
> + simple_if_fini $h2 192.0.2.2/24 2001:db8:1::2/64
> +}
> +
> +switch_create()
> +{
> + ip link add dev br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
> +
> + ip link set dev $swp1 master br0
> + ip link set dev $swp2 master br0
> +
> + ip link set dev br0 up
> + ip link set dev $swp1 up
> + ip link set dev $swp2 up
> +
> + bridge link set dev $swp1 learning off
> +}
> +
> +switch_destroy()
> +{
> + ip link set dev $swp2 down
> + ip link set dev $swp1 down
> +
> + ip link del dev br0
> +}
> +
> +setup_prepare()
> +{
> + h1=${NETIFS[p1]}
> + swp1=${NETIFS[p2]}
> +
> + swp2=${NETIFS[p3]}
> + h2=${NETIFS[p4]}
> +
> + vrf_prepare
> +
> + h1_create
> + h2_create
> +
> + switch_create
> +}
> +
> +cleanup()
> +{
> + pre_cleanup
> +
> + switch_destroy
> +
> + h2_destroy
> + h1_destroy
> +
> + vrf_cleanup
> +}
> +
> +ifaddr()
We already have mac_get()
> +{
> + ip -br link show dev "$1" | awk '{ print($3); }'
> +}
> +
> +locked_port_ipv4()
> +{
> + RET=0
> +
> + check_locked_port_support || return 0
> +
> + ping_do $h1 192.0.2.2
> + check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
Better to use unique error messages that pinpoint the problem:
"Ping did not work before locking port"
> +
> + bridge link set dev $swp1 locked on
> +
> + ping_do $h1 192.0.2.2
> + check_fail $? "Ping worked when it should not have"
"Ping worked after locking port, but before adding a FDB entry"
> +
> + bridge fdb add `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 master static
bridge fdb add $(mac_get $h1) dev $swp1 master static
> +
> + ping_do $h1 192.0.2.2
> + check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
"Ping did not work after locking port and adding a FDB entry"
> +
> + bridge link set dev $swp1 locked off
> + bridge fdb del `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 master static
I suggest to add another test case here to see that ping works after
unlocking the port and removing the FDB entry
Same comments on the other test cases
> + log_test "Locked port ipv4"
> +}
> +
> +locked_port_vlan()
> +{
> + RET=0
> +
> + check_locked_port_support || return 0
> + check_vlan_filtering_support || return 0
Why this check is needed? The bridge was already created with
"vlan_filtering 1"
> +
> + bridge vlan add vid 100 dev $swp1 tagged
Not familiar with "tagged" keyword. I believe iproute2 ignores it.
Please drop it
> + bridge vlan add vid 100 dev $swp2 tagged
> +
> + ping_do $h1.100 192.0.3.2
> + check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
> +
> + bridge link set dev $swp1 locked on
> + ping_do $h1.100 192.0.3.2
> + check_fail $? "Ping worked when it should not have"
> +
> + bridge fdb add `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 vlan 100 master static
> +
> + ping_do $h1.100 192.0.3.2
> + check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
> +
> + bridge link set dev $swp1 locked off
> + bridge vlan del vid 100 dev $swp1
> + bridge vlan del vid 100 dev $swp2
> + bridge fdb del `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 vlan 100 master static
> + log_test "Locked port vlan"
> +}
> +
> +locked_port_ipv6()
> +{
> + RET=0
> + check_locked_port_support || return 0
> +
> + ping6_do $h1 2001:db8:1::2
> + check_err $? "Ping6 didn't work when it should have"
> +
> + bridge link set dev $swp1 locked on
> +
> + ping6_do $h1 2001:db8:1::2
> + check_fail $? "Ping worked when it should not have"
> +
> + bridge fdb add `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 master static
> + ping6_do $h1 2001:db8:1::2
> + check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
> +
> + bridge link set dev $swp1 locked off
> + bridge fdb del `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 master static
> + log_test "Locked port ipv6"
> +}
> +
> +trap cleanup EXIT
> +
> +setup_prepare
> +setup_wait
> +
> +tests_run
> +
> +exit $EXIT_STATUS
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh
> index 7da783d6f453..9ded90f17ead 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh
> @@ -125,6 +125,22 @@ check_ethtool_lanes_support()
> fi
> }
>
> +check_locked_port_support()
> +{
> + if ! bridge -d link show | grep -q " locked"; then
> + echo "SKIP: iproute2 too old; Locked port feature not supported."
> + return $ksft_skip
> + fi
> +}
> +
> +check_vlan_filtering_support()
> +{
> + if ! bridge -d vlan show | grep -q "state forwarding"; then
> + echo "SKIP: vlan filtering not supported."
> + return $ksft_skip
> + fi
> +}
> +
> if [[ "$(id -u)" -ne 0 ]]; then
> echo "SKIP: need root privileges"
> exit $ksft_skip
> --
> 2.30.2
>
On sön, feb 20, 2022 at 11:12, Ido Schimmel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 04:51:48PM +0100, Hans Schultz wrote:
>> These tests check that the basic locked port feature works, so that no 'host'
>> can communicate (ping) through a locked port unless the MAC address of the
>> 'host' interface is in the forwarding database of the bridge.
>
> Thanks for adding the test. I assume this was tested with both mv88e6xxx
> and veth?
>
Yes, both cases have been tested. :-)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans Schultz <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> .../testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile | 1 +
>> .../net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh | 174 ++++++++++++++++++
>> tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh | 16 ++
>> 3 files changed, 191 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
>> index 72ee644d47bf..8fa97ae9af9e 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/Makefile
>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ OR MIT
>>
>> TEST_PROGS = bridge_igmp.sh \
>> + bridge_locked_port.sh \
>> bridge_port_isolation.sh \
>> bridge_sticky_fdb.sh \
>> bridge_vlan_aware.sh \
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 000000000000..d2805441b325
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh
>> @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
>> +#!/bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +
>> +ALL_TESTS="locked_port_ipv4 locked_port_ipv6 locked_port_vlan"
>> +NUM_NETIFS=4
>> +CHECK_TC="no"
>> +source lib.sh
>> +
>> +h1_create()
>> +{
>> + simple_if_init $h1 192.0.2.1/24 2001:db8:1::1/64
>> + vrf_create "vrf-vlan-h1"
>> + ip link set dev vrf-vlan-h1 up
>> + vlan_create $h1 100 vrf-vlan-h1 192.0.3.1/24 2001:db8:3::1/64
>
> In the tests we try to use only addresses specified in RFC 5737. Instead
> of 192.0.3.0/24 I suggest 198.51.100.0/24
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +h1_destroy()
>> +{
>> + vlan_destroy $h1 100
>> + simple_if_fini $h1 192.0.2.1/24 2001:db8:1::1/64
>> +}
>> +
>> +h2_create()
>> +{
>> + simple_if_init $h2 192.0.2.2/24 2001:db8:1::2/64
>> + vrf_create "vrf-vlan-h2"
>> + ip link set dev vrf-vlan-h2 up
>> + vlan_create $h2 100 vrf-vlan-h2 192.0.3.2/24 2001:db8:3::2/64
>> +}
>> +
>> +h2_destroy()
>> +{
>> + vlan_destroy $h2 100
>> + simple_if_fini $h2 192.0.2.2/24 2001:db8:1::2/64
>> +}
>> +
>> +switch_create()
>> +{
>> + ip link add dev br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
>> +
>> + ip link set dev $swp1 master br0
>> + ip link set dev $swp2 master br0
>> +
>> + ip link set dev br0 up
>> + ip link set dev $swp1 up
>> + ip link set dev $swp2 up
>> +
>> + bridge link set dev $swp1 learning off
>> +}
>> +
>> +switch_destroy()
>> +{
>> + ip link set dev $swp2 down
>> + ip link set dev $swp1 down
>> +
>> + ip link del dev br0
>> +}
>> +
>> +setup_prepare()
>> +{
>> + h1=${NETIFS[p1]}
>> + swp1=${NETIFS[p2]}
>> +
>> + swp2=${NETIFS[p3]}
>> + h2=${NETIFS[p4]}
>> +
>> + vrf_prepare
>> +
>> + h1_create
>> + h2_create
>> +
>> + switch_create
>> +}
>> +
>> +cleanup()
>> +{
>> + pre_cleanup
>> +
>> + switch_destroy
>> +
>> + h2_destroy
>> + h1_destroy
>> +
>> + vrf_cleanup
>> +}
>> +
>> +ifaddr()
>
> We already have mac_get()
>
>> +{
>> + ip -br link show dev "$1" | awk '{ print($3); }'
>> +}
>> +
>> +locked_port_ipv4()
>> +{
>> + RET=0
>> +
>> + check_locked_port_support || return 0
>> +
>> + ping_do $h1 192.0.2.2
>> + check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
>
> Better to use unique error messages that pinpoint the problem:
>
> "Ping did not work before locking port"
>
>> +
>> + bridge link set dev $swp1 locked on
>> +
>> + ping_do $h1 192.0.2.2
>> + check_fail $? "Ping worked when it should not have"
>
> "Ping worked after locking port, but before adding a FDB entry"
>
>> +
>> + bridge fdb add `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 master static
>
> bridge fdb add $(mac_get $h1) dev $swp1 master static
>
>> +
>> + ping_do $h1 192.0.2.2
>> + check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
>
> "Ping did not work after locking port and adding a FDB entry"
>
>> +
>> + bridge link set dev $swp1 locked off
>> + bridge fdb del `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 master static
>
> I suggest to add another test case here to see that ping works after
> unlocking the port and removing the FDB entry
>
> Same comments on the other test cases
>
>> + log_test "Locked port ipv4"
>> +}
>> +
>> +locked_port_vlan()
>> +{
>> + RET=0
>> +
>> + check_locked_port_support || return 0
>> + check_vlan_filtering_support || return 0
>
> Why this check is needed? The bridge was already created with
> "vlan_filtering 1"
>
>> +
>> + bridge vlan add vid 100 dev $swp1 tagged
>
> Not familiar with "tagged" keyword. I believe iproute2 ignores it.
> Please drop it
>
>> + bridge vlan add vid 100 dev $swp2 tagged
>> +
>> + ping_do $h1.100 192.0.3.2
>> + check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
>> +
>> + bridge link set dev $swp1 locked on
>> + ping_do $h1.100 192.0.3.2
>> + check_fail $? "Ping worked when it should not have"
>> +
>> + bridge fdb add `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 vlan 100 master static
>> +
>> + ping_do $h1.100 192.0.3.2
>> + check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
>> +
>> + bridge link set dev $swp1 locked off
>> + bridge vlan del vid 100 dev $swp1
>> + bridge vlan del vid 100 dev $swp2
>> + bridge fdb del `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 vlan 100 master static
>> + log_test "Locked port vlan"
>> +}
>> +
>> +locked_port_ipv6()
>> +{
>> + RET=0
>> + check_locked_port_support || return 0
>> +
>> + ping6_do $h1 2001:db8:1::2
>> + check_err $? "Ping6 didn't work when it should have"
>> +
>> + bridge link set dev $swp1 locked on
>> +
>> + ping6_do $h1 2001:db8:1::2
>> + check_fail $? "Ping worked when it should not have"
>> +
>> + bridge fdb add `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 master static
>> + ping6_do $h1 2001:db8:1::2
>> + check_err $? "Ping didn't work when it should have"
>> +
>> + bridge link set dev $swp1 locked off
>> + bridge fdb del `ifaddr $h1` dev $swp1 master static
>> + log_test "Locked port ipv6"
>> +}
>> +
>> +trap cleanup EXIT
>> +
>> +setup_prepare
>> +setup_wait
>> +
>> +tests_run
>> +
>> +exit $EXIT_STATUS
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh
>> index 7da783d6f453..9ded90f17ead 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/lib.sh
>> @@ -125,6 +125,22 @@ check_ethtool_lanes_support()
>> fi
>> }
>>
>> +check_locked_port_support()
>> +{
>> + if ! bridge -d link show | grep -q " locked"; then
>> + echo "SKIP: iproute2 too old; Locked port feature not supported."
>> + return $ksft_skip
>> + fi
>> +}
>> +
>> +check_vlan_filtering_support()
>> +{
>> + if ! bridge -d vlan show | grep -q "state forwarding"; then
>> + echo "SKIP: vlan filtering not supported."
>> + return $ksft_skip
>> + fi
>> +}
>> +
>> if [[ "$(id -u)" -ne 0 ]]; then
>> echo "SKIP: need root privileges"
>> exit $ksft_skip
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>