From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
Circumvent the .gitignore wildcard to avoid warnings about ignored
.kunitconfig files. As far as I can tell, the warnings are harmless
and these files are not actually ignored.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
---
.gitignore | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Resending... It was not clear to me if this file has a specific
maintainer. I chose to send it to the most recent committer.
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 70ec6037fa7a..51117ba29c88 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ modules.order
!.gitignore
!.mailmap
!.rustfmt.toml
+!.kunitconfig
#
# Generated include files
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 at 22:05, Chuck Lever <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
>
> Circumvent the .gitignore wildcard to avoid warnings about ignored
> .kunitconfig files. As far as I can tell, the warnings are harmless
> and these files are not actually ignored.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
> ---
Thanks very much.
We have an equivalent patch already staged in the kselftest/kunit for 6.3:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit&id=cb8865fd865f5b2f656d0d91f3b0146ef1acb10d
Cheers,
-- David
> On Apr 20, 2023, at 3:25 AM, David Gow <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 at 22:05, Chuck Lever <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> From: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
>>
>> Circumvent the .gitignore wildcard to avoid warnings about ignored
>> .kunitconfig files. As far as I can tell, the warnings are harmless
>> and these files are not actually ignored.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]>
>> ---
>
> Thanks very much.
>
> We have an equivalent patch already staged in the kselftest/kunit for 6.3:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit&id=cb8865fd865f5b2f656d0d91f3b0146ef1acb10d
Most excellent.
Yesterday, Jakub accepted my patch in net-next as part of
a series that also adds additional Kunit tests. My patch
can be dropped or reverted to avoid a merge conflict.
--
Chuck Lever