On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 12:01:29AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >From my build.log:
>>
>> WARNING: arch/x86/built-in.o(.text+0x1bb74): Section mismatch in reference from the function kvm_guest_cpu_online() to the function .cpuinit.text:kvm_guest_cpu_init()
>> The function kvm_guest_cpu_online() references
>> the function __cpuinit kvm_guest_cpu_init().
>> This is often because kvm_guest_cpu_online lacks a __cpuinit
>> annotation or the annotation of kvm_guest_cpu_init is wrong.
>>
>> This patch fixes the warning.
>>
>> Tested with linux-next (next-20101231)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <[email protected]>
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
>
PING!
Was this patch really applied? I have it still in my patch-series.
- Sedat -
P.S.: My current patch-series
sd@tbox:~/src/linux-2.6$ grep OK setup_linux-next_next20110202.dileks.1.log
(+) OK linux-next/patch-v2.6.38-rc3-next-20110202
(+) OK linux-next/Remove-localversion-next.patch
(+) OK debian/version.patch
(+) OK debian/kernelvariables-v2.patch
(+) OK debian/doc-build-parallel.patch
(+) OK bugfix/ia64/hardcode-arch-script-output.patch
(+) OK bugfix/mips/disable-advansys.patch
(+) OK bugfix/arm/disable-scsi_acard.patch
(+) OK debian/mips-disable-werror.patch
(+) OK bugfix/powerpc/lpar-console.patch
(+) OK features/all/i915-autoload-without-CONFIG_DRM_I915_KMS.patch
(+) OK debian/arch-sh4-fix-uimage-build.patch
(+) OK debian/af_802154-Disable-auto-loading-as-mitigation-against.patch
(+) OK debian/rds-Disable-auto-loading-as-mitigation-against-local.patch
(+) OK debian/decnet-Disable-auto-loading-as-mitigation-against-lo.patch
(+) OK bugfix/mips/mips-ide-flush-dcache.patch
(+) OK bugfix/all/qla4xxx-Fix-build-on-some-architectures-lacking-64-bit-I-O.patch
(+) OK bugfix/x86/Skip-looking-for-ioapic-overrides-when-ioapics-are-not-present.patch
(+) OK bugfix/arm/ixp4xx-add-missing-export.patch
(+) OK features/all/Kbuild-kconfig-Verbose-version-of-listnewconfig-v2.patch
(+) OK bugfix/arm/arm-ixp4xx-Rename-FREQ-macro-to-avoid-collisions-2.patch
(+) OK debian/alpha-Do-not-use-Werror-for-arch-alpha-v2.patch
(+) OK from-johill/001-debug-section-mismatch.patch
(+) OK linux-2.6-trace-unlikely/linux-2.6-trace-unlikely.patch
(+) OK mm-fix/cgroup-Avoid-a-memset-by-using-vzalloc.patch
(+) OK danvet-drm-for-sedat-dilek-v2/0001-drm-nouveau-don-t-munge-in-drm_mm-internals.patch
(+) OK danvet-drm-for-sedat-dilek-v2/0002-drm-mm-track-free-areas-implicitly.patch
(+) OK danvet-drm-for-sedat-dilek-v2/0003-drm-mm-extract-node-insert-helper-functions.patch
(+) OK danvet-drm-for-sedat-dilek-v2/0004-drm-mm-add-api-for-embedding-struct-drm_mm_node.patch
(+) OK danvet-drm-for-sedat-dilek-v2/0005-drm-mm-add-helper-to-unwind-scan-state.patch
(+) OK danvet-drm-for-sedat-dilek-v2/0006-drm-nouveau-don-t-munge-in-drm_mm-internals-follow-u.patch
(+) OK danvet-drm-for-sedat-dilek-v2-fix/0001-drm-nouveau-don-t-munge-in-drm_mm-internals-follow-u.patch
(+) OK danvet-embed-drm_gem_object-into-radeon_bo/1-3-drm-radeon-embed-struct-drm_gem_object-v2.patch
(+) OK danvet-embed-drm_gem_object-into-radeon_bo/2-3-drm-radeon-introduce-gem_to_radeon_bo-helper.patch
(+) OK danvet-embed-drm_gem_object-into-radeon_bo/3-3-drm-radeon-kill-radeon_bo--gobj-pointer.patch
(+) OK drm-radeon-kms-writeback/drm-radeon-kms-Enable-writeback-on-radeon-AGP-boards.patch
(+) OK backlight-type/1-5-Backlight-Add-backlight-type.patch
(+) OK backlight-type/2-5-i915-Add-native-backlight-control.patch
(+) OK backlight-type/v2-drm-radeon-kms-Expose-backlight-class-device-for-legacy-LVDS-encoder.patch
(+) OK backlight-type/4-5-nouveau-Change-the-backlight-parent-device-to-the-connector-not-the-PCI-dev.patch
(+) OK backlight-type/5-5-ACPI-Tie-ACPI-backlight-devices-to-PCI-devices-if-possible.patch
(+) OK drm-driverdate-coredate-removal/0001-drm-Remove-DRIVER_DATE-from-drm-drivers.patch
(+) OK drm-driverdate-coredate-removal/0002-drm-Remove-CORE_DATE-from-drm-core-and-drm-sysfs.patch
(+) OK drm-driverdate-coredate-removal/0003-drm-Fix-DRM_INFO-after-DRIVER_DATE-CORE_DATE-removal.patch
(+) OK drm-driverdate-coredate-removal/0004-drm-Remove-date_len-and-date-from-drm_version.patch
(+) OK mac80211-fix/mac80211-minstrel-honor-max-retry-counts-from-cfg80211.patch
(+) OK kvm-fix/kvm-Fix-section-mismatch-derived-from-kvm_guest_cpu_online.patch
- EOT -
On 02/02/2011 09:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Marcelo Tosatti<[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 12:01:29AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> > From my build.log:
> >>
> >> WARNING: arch/x86/built-in.o(.text+0x1bb74): Section mismatch in reference from the function kvm_guest_cpu_online() to the function .cpuinit.text:kvm_guest_cpu_init()
> >> The function kvm_guest_cpu_online() references
> >> the function __cpuinit kvm_guest_cpu_init().
> >> This is often because kvm_guest_cpu_online lacks a __cpuinit
> >> annotation or the annotation of kvm_guest_cpu_init is wrong.
> >>
> >> This patch fixes the warning.
> >>
> >> Tested with linux-next (next-20101231)
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek<[email protected]>
> >
> > Applied, thanks.
> >
> >
>
> PING!
>
> Was this patch really applied? I have it still in my patch-series.
>
It was applied to kvm.git and will find its way upstream eventually.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Avi Kivity <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 09:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Marcelo Tosatti<[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 12:01:29AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >> > From my build.log:
>> >>
>> >> WARNING: arch/x86/built-in.o(.text+0x1bb74): Section mismatch in
>> >> reference from the function kvm_guest_cpu_online() to the function
>> >> .cpuinit.text:kvm_guest_cpu_init()
>> >> The function kvm_guest_cpu_online() references
>> >> the function __cpuinit kvm_guest_cpu_init().
>> >> This is often because kvm_guest_cpu_online lacks a __cpuinit
>> >> annotation or the annotation of kvm_guest_cpu_init is wrong.
>> >>
>> >> This patch fixes the warning.
>> >>
>> >> Tested with linux-next (next-20101231)
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek<[email protected]>
>> >
>> > Applied, thanks.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> PING!
>>
>> Was this patch really applied? I have it still in my patch-series.
>>
>
> It was applied to kvm.git and will find its way upstream eventually.
>
OK, I found it [1] in next GIT branch [2] and I guess this branch is
not pulled into linux-next.
Thanks for the pointer.
- Sedat -
[1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/avi/kvm.git;a=commit;h=ca905a6071b3daca83a91ae43106c40bd85e8a3d
[2] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/avi/kvm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next