lvs sctp protocol handler is incorrectly invoked ip_vs_app_pkt_out
Since there's no sctp helpers at present, it does the same thing as
ip_vs_app_pkt_in.
Signed-off-by: Xiaoyu Du <[email protected]>
---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
index c9a3f7a..db55759 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb,
return 0;
/* Call application helper if needed */
- if (!ip_vs_app_pkt_out(cp, skb))
+ if (!ip_vs_app_pkt_in(cp, skb))
return 0;
}
--
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:55:04AM +0800, xiaoyu Du wrote:
> lvs sctp protocol handler is incorrectly invoked ip_vs_app_pkt_out
> Since there's no sctp helpers at present, it does the same thing as
> ip_vs_app_pkt_in.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyu Du <[email protected]>
Thanks Xiaoyu.
Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Patrick, please consider applying this.
nf-next should be sufficient, as according
to Xiaoyu there aren't actually helpers
that exercise this code at the moment.
> ---
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> index c9a3f7a..db55759 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb,
> return 0;
>
> /* Call application helper if needed */
> - if (!ip_vs_app_pkt_out(cp, skb))
> + if (!ip_vs_app_pkt_in(cp, skb))
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
Am 08.07.2010 14:13, schrieb Simon Horman:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 09:55:04AM +0800, xiaoyu Du wrote:
>> lvs sctp protocol handler is incorrectly invoked ip_vs_app_pkt_out
>> Since there's no sctp helpers at present, it does the same thing as
>> ip_vs_app_pkt_in.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyu Du <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks Xiaoyu.
>
> Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
>
> Patrick, please consider applying this.
> nf-next should be sufficient, as according
> to Xiaoyu there aren't actually helpers
> that exercise this code at the moment.
Applied, thanks.