2010-08-09 12:07:38

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 00/14] DMAENGINE: ste_dma40: bugfixes and enhancements

This patch series adds a few bugfixes and some enhancements to the
DMA40 driver. Most should be pretty straight forward, others are
more elaborate, like the amendments to extend hw job lists at
runtime if there is already a queued job.

We know we're in the merge window, it's not like the world will
collapse if this has to wait for the next release cycle.

Yours,
Linus Walleij <[email protected]>


2010-08-25 17:19:16

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] DMAENGINE: ste_dma40: bugfixes and enhancements

2010/8/9 Linus Walleij <[email protected]>:

> This patch series adds a few bugfixes and some enhancements to the
> DMA40 driver. Most should be pretty straight forward, others are
> more elaborate, like the amendments to extend hw job lists at
> runtime if there is already a queued job.

Dan, can these be queued for -next? Shouldn't be any controversial
stuff in them AFAICT.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

2010-08-27 22:02:58

by Dan Williams

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] DMAENGINE: ste_dma40: bugfixes and enhancements

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Linus Walleij
<[email protected]> wrote:
> 2010/8/9 Linus Walleij <[email protected]>:
>
>> This patch series adds a few bugfixes and some enhancements to the
>> DMA40 driver. Most should be pretty straight forward, others are
>> more elaborate, like the amendments to extend hw job lists at
>> runtime if there is already a queued job.
>
> Dan, can these be queued for -next? Shouldn't be any controversial
> stuff in them AFAICT.

Yes, consider them acked-by and on their way to -next. I've been
preparing for the birth of my daughter who finally arrived on
Wednesday! So expect intermittent attention to drivers/dma/ through
the middle of September. I do plan to get this pushed before then,
and catch up on the i.mx sdma discussion.

Thanks for your review, and patience,

Regards,
Dan