Richard, any feedback on this?
--
Matthew Garrett | [email protected]
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 +0000
Matthew Garrett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Richard, any feedback on this?
>
At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backlight from Richard,
since Richard is very distracted with other things atm (please correct
me if I'm wrong).
So either someone needs to volunteer to maintain this subsystem (I know
how much you love backlights, maybe you'd like to do it?) or you need to
get this patch over to akpm.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 +0000 Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>
> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backlight from Richard,
> since Richard is very distracted with other things atm (please correct
> me if I'm wrong).
>
> So either someone needs to volunteer to maintain this subsystem (I know
> how much you love backlights, maybe you'd like to do it?) or you need to
> get this patch over to akpm.
this go anywhere ?
-mike
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 02:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:44, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:48:20 +0000 Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> Richard, any feedback on this?
>>
>> At KS akpm said he'd likely be taking over backlight from Richard,
>> since Richard is very distracted with other things atm (please correct
>> me if I'm wrong).
>>
>> So either someone needs to volunteer to maintain this subsystem (I know
>> how much you love backlights, maybe you'd like to do it?) or you need to
>> get this patch over to akpm.
>
> this go anywhere ?
nm, i see it was just merged. one of the things i pointed out though
is still there:
-static const char const *backlight_types[] = {
+static const char const * const backlight_types[] = {
-mike