This message contains a list of some post-2.6.34 regressions introduced before
2.6.35, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.34 regressions, please let us know
either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any
of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2010-08-30 124 38 34
2010-08-01 100 27 23
2010-07-23 94 33 25
2010-07-09 79 45 37
2010-06-21 46 37 26
2010-06-09 15 13 10
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17071
Subject : possible esata regression in 2.6.35
Submitter : Nicolas Jungers <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-21 18:52 (9 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128241685406276&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16691
Subject : IPW5100: iwlagn broken with 2.6.34.x to 2.6.35.2 update
Submitter : Can Celasun <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-21 08:28 (9 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16633
Subject : ath5k + 2.6.35 x86 + hostapd - Failed to set channel
Submitter : NiTr0 <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-19 19:37 (11 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16620
Subject : [REGRESSION 2.6.35+] crash (maybe kmemleak related)
Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-12 20:37 (18 days old)
Message-ID : <1281645464.3893.25.camel@maxim-laptop>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128164549415081&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16614
Subject : [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004fbc5>] [<ffffffffa004fbc5>] em28xx_isoc_copy_vbi+0x62e/0x812 [em28xx]
Submitter : Sander Eikelenboom <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-10 22:12 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128152075830927&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16613
Subject : i8042 kernel module failed to load after unloading
Submitter : Seryodkin Victor <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-17 17:01 (13 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16562
Subject : 2.6.35: cpu_idle bug report / on i7 870 cpu (x86_64)
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-06 22:09 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128113260904048&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16549
Subject : 2.6.35: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage
Submitter : Vladislav Bolkhovitin <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-04 10:56 (26 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128091938215177&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16537
Subject : TREE_RCU hangs at boot
Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-07 12:18 (23 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16536
Subject : audio stop playing after while
Submitter : okias <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-07 11:00 (23 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16525
Subject : unexpected high load since 2.6.35
Submitter : [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-02 20:53 (28 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128078243726655&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16515
Subject : Radeon rv280 can't boot on kernel 2.6.35.
Submitter : Albert Gall <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-04 16:10 (26 days old)
Handled-By : Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16506
Subject : 2.6.35.0 compilation errors and excessive warnings.
Submitter : <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-04 01:06 (26 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16495
Subject : Kernel 2.6.35 takes almost half an hour to boot
Submitter : Claudio M. Camacho <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-02 17:16 (28 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16488
Subject : [i915] Framebuffer ID error after suspend/hibernate leading to X crash
Submitter : Milan Bouchet-Valat <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-01 08:55 (29 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16462
Subject : unable to connect to AP on legal channel 13
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-25 17:06 (36 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16458
Subject : Bluetooth disabled after resume
Submitter : AttilaN <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-25 09:33 (36 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16448
Subject : 2.6.35-rc5 panic at __br_deliver+0x64/0xe0 with kvm bridge networking
Submitter : [email protected]
Date : 2010-07-23 3:25 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <198123598.1050221279855515402.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127985553916052&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16423
Subject : netfilter/iptables stopped logging 2.6.35-rc
Submitter : [email protected]
Date : 2010-07-17 10:20 (44 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1007.2/00440.html
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16406
Subject : Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box
Submitter : divya <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-16 8:50 (45 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127927024906085&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16396
Subject : [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system
Submitter : tomas m <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-15 02:32 (46 days old)
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-14 13:52 (47 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127911564213748&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16380
Subject : Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35
Submitter : Artem S. Tashkinov <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-13 23:21 (48 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
Message-ID : <<[email protected]>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323
Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
Submitter : Miles Lane <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (60 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322
Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70()
Submitter : boris64 <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (60 days old)
Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (65 days old)
Message-ID : <<[email protected]>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (82 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine)
Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (75 days old)
Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221
Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id
Submitter : Miles Lane <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (80 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184
Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (79 days old)
Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
Submitter : David Hill <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (82 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16505
Subject : 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
Submitter : archman <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-03 23:53 (27 days old)
Handled-By : Larry Finger <[email protected]>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27335
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16405
Subject : Brightness Adjustment on Toshiba nb305 Netbooks is non-functional.
Submitter : John Mesmon <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-15 23:40 (46 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/74a365b3f354fafc537efa5867deb7a9fadbfe27
Handled-By : Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27236
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16400
Subject : 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state
Submitter : Martin Pirker <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-14 20:33 (47 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127913961025267&w=2
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127939627513154&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (63 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2
Handled-By : Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27272
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16055
Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.
Thanks!
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
Submitter : David Hill <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (82 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
Looks like it's fixed.
Eric
"David Hill" <[email protected]> writes:
> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:09:52 -0700
>
> Eureka!
>
> This seems to solve my problem! My Dual P3-500MHZ is now booting with that
> patch.
>
> Good work guys!!!!
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
> Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
> Submitter : David Hill <[email protected]>
> Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (82 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-14 13:52 (47 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127911564213748&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
Subject : WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-28 9:40 (63 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127771804806465&w=2
Handled-By : Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27272
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16423
Subject : netfilter/iptables stopped logging 2.6.35-rc
Submitter : [email protected]
Date : 2010-07-17 10:20 (44 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1007.2/00440.html
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16406
Subject : Badness with the kernel version 2.6.35-rc1-git1 running on P6 box
Submitter : divya <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-16 8:50 (45 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127927024906085&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16458
Subject : Bluetooth disabled after resume
Submitter : AttilaN <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-25 09:33 (36 days old)
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16488
Subject : [i915] Framebuffer ID error after suspend/hibernate leading to X crash
Submitter : Milan Bouchet-Valat <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-01 08:55 (29 days old)
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16495
Subject : Kernel 2.6.35 takes almost half an hour to boot
Submitter : Claudio M. Camacho <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-02 17:16 (28 days old)
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16536
Subject : audio stop playing after while
Submitter : okias <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-07 11:00 (23 days old)
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16537
Subject : TREE_RCU hangs at boot
Submitter : Rolf Eike Beer <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-07 12:18 (23 days old)
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16549
Subject : 2.6.35: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage
Submitter : Vladislav Bolkhovitin <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-04 10:56 (26 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128091938215177&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16691
Subject : IPW5100: iwlagn broken with 2.6.34.x to 2.6.35.2 update
Submitter : Can Celasun <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-21 08:28 (9 days old)
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17071
Subject : possible esata regression in 2.6.35
Submitter : Nicolas Jungers <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-21 18:52 (9 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128241685406276&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16614
Subject : [2.6.35] usb 2.0 em28xx kernel panic general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa004fbc5>] [<ffffffffa004fbc5>] em28xx_isoc_copy_vbi+0x62e/0x812 [em28xx]
Submitter : Sander Eikelenboom <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-10 22:12 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128152075830927&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16562
Subject : 2.6.35: cpu_idle bug report / on i7 870 cpu (x86_64)
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-06 22:09 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128113260904048&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16620
Subject : [REGRESSION 2.6.35+] crash (maybe kmemleak related)
Submitter : Maxim Levitsky <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-12 20:37 (18 days old)
Message-ID : <1281645464.3893.25.camel@maxim-laptop>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128164549415081&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16633
Subject : ath5k + 2.6.35 x86 + hostapd - Failed to set channel
Submitter : NiTr0 <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-19 19:37 (11 days old)
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16613
Subject : i8042 kernel module failed to load after unloading
Submitter : Seryodkin Victor <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-17 17:01 (13 days old)
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16525
Subject : unexpected high load since 2.6.35
Submitter : [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-02 20:53 (28 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128078243726655&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16515
Subject : Radeon rv280 can't boot on kernel 2.6.35.
Submitter : Albert Gall <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-04 16:10 (26 days old)
Handled-By : Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16184
Subject : Container, X86-64, i386, iptables rule
Submitter : Jean-Marc Pigeon <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-12 04:17 (79 days old)
Handled-By : Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16448
Subject : 2.6.35-rc5 panic at __br_deliver+0x64/0xe0 with kvm bridge networking
Submitter : [email protected]
Date : 2010-07-23 3:25 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <198123598.1050221279855515402.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127985553916052&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16506
Subject : 2.6.35.0 compilation errors and excessive warnings.
Submitter : <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-04 01:06 (26 days old)
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16505
Subject : 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
Submitter : archman <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-08-03 23:53 (27 days old)
Handled-By : Larry Finger <[email protected]>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27335
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (82 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16323
Subject : 2.6.35-rc3-git4 - kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
Submitter : Miles Lane <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-01 12:21 (60 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127798693125541&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
Submitter : Justin P. Mattock <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
Message-ID : <<[email protected]>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322
Subject : WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70()
Submitter : boris64 <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-01 13:54 (60 days old)
Handled-By : H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16462
Subject : unable to connect to AP on legal channel 13
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-25 17:06 (36 days old)
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16396
Subject : [bisected] resume from suspend freezes system
Submitter : tomas m <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-15 02:32 (46 days old)
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16228
Subject : BUG/boot failure on Dell Precision T3500 (pci/ahci_stop_engine)
Submitter : Brian Bloniarz <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-16 17:57 (75 days old)
Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16400
Subject : 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state
Submitter : Martin Pirker <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-14 20:33 (47 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127913961025267&w=2
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127939627513154&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16380
Subject : Loop devices act strangely in 2.6.35
Submitter : Artem S. Tashkinov <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-13 23:21 (48 days old)
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (65 days old)
Message-ID : <<[email protected]>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16405
Subject : Brightness Adjustment on Toshiba nb305 Netbooks is non-functional.
Submitter : John Mesmon <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-07-15 23:40 (46 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/74a365b3f354fafc537efa5867deb7a9fadbfe27
Handled-By : Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27236
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16221
Subject : 2.6.35-rc2-git5 -- [drm:drm_mode_getfb] *ERROR* invalid framebuffer id
Submitter : Miles Lane <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-06-11 20:31 (80 days old)
Message-ID : <[email protected]>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127628828119623&w=2
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
>
> Looks like it's fixed.
Good. What mainlne commit is that?
Rafael
> "David Hill" <[email protected]> writes:
> > Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:09:52 -0700
> >
> > Eureka!
> >
> > This seems to solve my problem! My Dual P3-500MHZ is now booting with that
> > patch.
> >
> > Good work guys!!!!
> >
> > Thank you very much,
>
>
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
> > Subject : After uncompressing the kernel, at boot time, the server hangs.
> > Submitter : David Hill <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2010-06-09 23:25 (82 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> > Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
>
>
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
> On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>> >
>> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
>> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>> >
>>
>> Looks like it's fixed.
>
> Good. What mainlne commit is that?
commit 910081322bf9c4ed392dc8f2ecbc33fdb42a2958
Author: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
Date: Wed Aug 4 12:51:11 2010 -0700
x86/apic: Map the local apic when parsing the MP table.
This fixes a regression in 2.6.35 from 2.6.34, that is
present for select models of Intel cpus when people are
using an MP table.
The commit cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
"x86, ioapic: In mpparse use mp_register_ioapic" started
calling mp_register_ioapic from MP_ioapic_info. An extremely
simple change that was obviously correct. Unfortunately
mp_register_ioapic did just a little more than the previous
hand crafted code and so we gained this call path.
The problem call path is:
MP_ioapic_info()
mp_register_ioapic()
io_apic_unique_id()
io_apic_get_unique_id()
get_physical_broadcast()
modern_apic()
lapic_get_version()
apic_read(APIC_LVR)
Which turned out to be a problem because the local apic
was not mapped, at that point, unlike the similar point
in the ACPI parsing code.
This problem is fixed by mapping the local apic when
parsing the mptable as soon as we reasonably can.
Looking at the number of places we setup the fixmap for
the local apic, I see some serious simplification opportunities.
For the moment except for not duplicating the setting up of the
fixmap in init_apic_mappings, I have not acted on them.
The regression from 2.6.34 is tracked in bug
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: David Hill <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> Submitter : Justin P. Mattock<[email protected]>
> Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
> Message-ID :<<[email protected]>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
>
>
>
only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or
pauli where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.
Justin P. Mattock
On 08/29/2010 06:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16505
> Subject : 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
> Submitter : archman <[email protected]>
> Date : 2010-08-03 23:53 (27 days old)
> Handled-By : Larry Finger <[email protected]>
> Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27335
This one was fixed in 2.6.34.3. Mainline was OK - only the patches to stable
were affected. The bug should be closed.
Larry
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
> Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
> Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf <[email protected]>
> Date : 2010-07-14 13:52 (47 days old)
> Message-ID : <[email protected]>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127911564213748&w=2
>
This bug is already fixed by:
e75aa85892b2ee78c79edac720868cbef16e62eb
Please close this entry.
Thanks.
--
?A man who doesn't know he is in prison can never escape.?
William S. Burroughs
Verifying: the bug is still actual
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. ?Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16613
> Subject ? ? ? ? : i8042 kernel module failed to load after unloading
> Submitter ? ? ? : Seryodkin Victor <[email protected]>
> Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2010-08-17 17:01 (13 days old)
>
>
>
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Justin P. Mattock
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. ?Please verify if it still should
>> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
>> Subject ? ? ? ? : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> Submitter ? ? ? : Justin P. Mattock<[email protected]>
>> Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
>> Message-ID ? ? ?:<<[email protected]>>
>> References ? ? ?: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or pauli
> where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.
>
> Justin P. Mattock
>
I was able to reproduce this with about 50% chance in boot. But that
happened in a few rc (rc2-rc4 iirc) versions only. After that never
again.
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
> Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
> Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <[email protected]>
> Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
> Message-ID : <[email protected]>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
>
>
Should be fixed by:
commit 351af0725e5222e35741011d1ea62215c1ed06db
Author: Zhang, Yanmin <[email protected]>
Date: Fri Aug 6 13:39:08 2010 +0800
perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround
Fix the Errata AAK100/AAP53/BD53 workaround, the officialy documented
workaround we implemented in:
11164cd: perf, x86: Add Nehelem PMU programming errata workaround
doesn't actually work fully and causes a stuck PMU state
under load and non-functioning perf profiling.
A functional workaround was found by trial & error.
Affects all Nehalem-class Intel PMUs.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
LKML-Reference: <[email protected]>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]> # .35.x
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:49:06 -0700
ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/[email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
> >>
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> >> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >> >
> >>
> >> Looks like it's fixed.
> >
> > Good. What mainlne commit is that?
>
> commit 910081322bf9c4ed392dc8f2ecbc33fdb42a2958
> Author: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
> Date: Wed Aug 4 12:51:11 2010 -0700
>
> x86/apic: Map the local apic when parsing the MP table.
>
> This fixes a regression in 2.6.35 from 2.6.34, that is
> present for select models of Intel cpus when people are
> using an MP table.
>
> The commit cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> "x86, ioapic: In mpparse use mp_register_ioapic" started
> calling mp_register_ioapic from MP_ioapic_info. An extremely
> simple change that was obviously correct. Unfortunately
> mp_register_ioapic did just a little more than the previous
> hand crafted code and so we gained this call path.
>
> The problem call path is:
> MP_ioapic_info()
> mp_register_ioapic()
> io_apic_unique_id()
> io_apic_get_unique_id()
> get_physical_broadcast()
> modern_apic()
> lapic_get_version()
> apic_read(APIC_LVR)
>
> Which turned out to be a problem because the local apic
> was not mapped, at that point, unlike the similar point
> in the ACPI parsing code.
>
> This problem is fixed by mapping the local apic when
> parsing the mptable as soon as we reasonably can.
>
> Looking at the number of places we setup the fixmap for
> the local apic, I see some serious simplification opportunities.
> For the moment except for not duplicating the setting up of the
> fixmap in init_apic_mappings, I have not acted on them.
>
> The regression from 2.6.34 is tracked in bug
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Reported-by: David Hill <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin-j34lQMj1tz/[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin-j34lQMj1tz/[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Closed, thx.
Guan Xin reported a stable regression from 2.6.35.1->2.6.35.2
in this bugreport which I moved to
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17411 .
Cheers,
Flo
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:56:04 +0200
Markus Trippelsdorf <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:13:29AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
> > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
> > Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2010-07-14 13:52 (47 days old)
> > Message-ID : <[email protected]>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127911564213748&w=2
> >
>
> This bug is already fixed by:
> e75aa85892b2ee78c79edac720868cbef16e62eb
>
> Please close this entry.
> Thanks.
>
Closed.
Thx,
Flo
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:13:04 +0400
Victor Seryodkin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Verifying: the bug is still actual
>
I updated the bugzilla entry accordingly.
Thx,
Flo
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:12:43 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
> > Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
> > Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/[email protected]>
> > Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
> > Message-ID : <1279008849.2096.913.camel-sz7BYL/Y5Hu/P+R7jlPCFVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
> >
> >
>
> Should be fixed by:
>
> commit 351af0725e5222e35741011d1ea62215c1ed06db
> Author: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/[email protected]>
> Date: Fri Aug 6 13:39:08 2010 +0800
>
> perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround
Thx, closed.
Cheers,
Flo
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:41:16 -0500
Larry Finger <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On 08/29/2010 06:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16505
> > Subject : 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
> > Submitter : archman <spermmail001-/[email protected]>
> > Date : 2010-08-03 23:53 (27 days old)
> > Handled-By : Larry Finger <[email protected]>
> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27335
>
> This one was fixed in 2.6.34.3. Mainline was OK - only the patches to stable
> were affected. The bug should be closed.
>
> Larry
>
In the bugzilla entry someone mentioned that 2.6.32.y need this
too?
Cheers,
Flo
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Monday, August 30, 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
> >>
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> >> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >> >
> >>
> >> Looks like it's fixed.
> >
> > Good. What mainlne commit is that?
>
> commit 910081322bf9c4ed392dc8f2ecbc33fdb42a2958
> Author: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed Aug 4 12:51:11 2010 -0700
>
> x86/apic: Map the local apic when parsing the MP table.
>
> This fixes a regression in 2.6.35 from 2.6.34, that is
> present for select models of Intel cpus when people are
> using an MP table.
>
> The commit cf7500c0ea133d66f8449d86392d83f840102632
> "x86, ioapic: In mpparse use mp_register_ioapic" started
> calling mp_register_ioapic from MP_ioapic_info. An extremely
> simple change that was obviously correct. Unfortunately
> mp_register_ioapic did just a little more than the previous
> hand crafted code and so we gained this call path.
>
> The problem call path is:
> MP_ioapic_info()
> mp_register_ioapic()
> io_apic_unique_id()
> io_apic_get_unique_id()
> get_physical_broadcast()
> modern_apic()
> lapic_get_version()
> apic_read(APIC_LVR)
>
> Which turned out to be a problem because the local apic
> was not mapped, at that point, unlike the similar point
> in the ACPI parsing code.
>
> This problem is fixed by mapping the local apic when
> parsing the mptable as soon as we reasonably can.
>
> Looking at the number of places we setup the fixmap for
> the local apic, I see some serious simplification opportunities.
> For the moment except for not duplicating the setting up of the
> fixmap in init_apic_mappings, I have not acted on them.
>
> The regression from 2.6.34 is tracked in bug
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16173
>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Reported-by: David Hill <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Justin P. Mattock
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 08/29/2010 04:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >>
> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> >> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >>
> >>
> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337
> >> Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> >> Submitter : Justin P. Mattock<[email protected]>
> >> Date : 2010-07-03 22:59 (58 days old)
> >> Message-ID :<<[email protected]>>
> >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127819798215589&w=2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > only have seen this once..on the other hand (If im correct)maciej or pauli
> > where able to reproduce this.. I say leave open then go from there.
> >
> > Justin P. Mattock
> >
>
> I was able to reproduce this with about 50% chance in boot. But that
> happened in a few rc (rc2-rc4 iirc) versions only. After that never
> again.
OK, I'm closing it now, please reopen if you see it again.
Rafael
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399
> > Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc
> > Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15
> > Message-ID : <[email protected]>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2
> >
> >
>
> Should be fixed by:
>
> commit 351af0725e5222e35741011d1ea62215c1ed06db
> Author: Zhang, Yanmin <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri Aug 6 13:39:08 2010 +0800
>
> perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround
>
> Fix the Errata AAK100/AAP53/BD53 workaround, the officialy documented
> workaround we implemented in:
>
> 11164cd: perf, x86: Add Nehelem PMU programming errata workaround
>
> doesn't actually work fully and causes a stuck PMU state
> under load and non-functioning perf profiling.
>
> A functional workaround was found by trial & error.
>
> Affects all Nehalem-class Intel PMUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> LKML-Reference: <[email protected]>
> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]> # .35.x
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
On Monday, August 30, 2010, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 08/29/2010 06:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16505
> > Subject : 2.6.34.2 breaks b43
> > Submitter : archman <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2010-08-03 23:53 (27 days old)
> > Handled-By : Larry Finger <[email protected]>
> > Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=27335
>
> This one was fixed in 2.6.34.3. Mainline was OK - only the patches to stable
> were affected. The bug should be closed.
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
> Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
> Submitter : Enrico Bandiello <[email protected]>
> Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (65 days old)
> Message-ID : <<[email protected]>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2
Same with v2.6.36-rc3
$ sudo powertop -d -t 20
...
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 196.2 interval: 20.0s
no ACPI power usage estimate available
Top causes for wakeups:
25.4% ( 59.6) [i915@pci:0000:00:02.0] <interrupt>
...
- Kanru
On 08/31/2010 04:19 AM, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Same with v2.6.36-rc3
>
> $ sudo powertop -d -t 20
> ...
> Wakeups-from-idle per second : 196.2 interval: 20.0s
> no ACPI power usage estimate available
> Top causes for wakeups:
> 25.4% ( 59.6) [i915@pci:0000:00:02.0]<interrupt>
I can confir this behaviour until 2.6.32-rc2. Couldn't try with -rc3
because compilation exited with error on my laptop...
On 30/08/10 02:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
> Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
> Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <[email protected]>
> Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
> Message-ID : <[email protected]>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
>
Dear Rafael Wysocki,
This regression still exists in 2.6.35.4. (I haven't tested 2.6.36-rcX
series.) Kosaki Motohiro has kindly helped me with this issue and found
a fix for the regression. Today I have successfully tested his patch,
but I don't know whether the patch needs to be further refined and tested.
Regards,
M. Vefa Bicakci
On Tuesday, August 31, 2010, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
> On 30/08/10 02:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
> > Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
> > Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <[email protected]>
> > Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
> > Message-ID : <[email protected]>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
> >
>
> Dear Rafael Wysocki,
>
> This regression still exists in 2.6.35.4. (I haven't tested 2.6.36-rcX
> series.) Kosaki Motohiro has kindly helped me with this issue and found
> a fix for the regression. Today I have successfully tested his patch,
> but I don't know whether the patch needs to be further refined and tested.
Thanks for the information. Do you have a pointer to the patch?
Rafael
> On Tuesday, August 31, 2010, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
> > On 30/08/10 02:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
> > > Subject : [Bisected Regression in 2.6.35] A full tmpfs filesystem causes hibernationto hang
> > > Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <[email protected]>
> > > Date : 2010-08-15 5:25 (15 days old)
> > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
> > > Message-ID : <[email protected]>
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128184995401968&w=2
> > >
> >
> > Dear Rafael Wysocki,
> >
> > This regression still exists in 2.6.35.4. (I haven't tested 2.6.36-rcX
> > series.) Kosaki Motohiro has kindly helped me with this issue and found
> > a fix for the regression. Today I have successfully tested his patch,
> > but I don't know whether the patch needs to be further refined and tested.
>
> Thanks for the information. Do you have a pointer to the patch?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/31/429
Thanks.