2013-06-28 18:43:49

by Hartley Sweeten

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] spi: spi-ep93xx: use bits_per_word_mask

This driver supports 16 to 4 bits per work. Set the bits_per_word_mask
to allows the spi core to handle validation.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <[email protected]>
Cc: Ryan Mallon <[email protected]>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
---
drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 11 +----------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
index c633cd0..93ae7b6 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
@@ -272,12 +272,6 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
struct ep93xx_spi_chip *chip;

- if (spi->bits_per_word < 4 || spi->bits_per_word > 16) {
- dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "invalid bits per word %d\n",
- spi->bits_per_word);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
chip = spi_get_ctldata(spi);
if (!chip) {
dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "initial setup for %s\n",
@@ -341,10 +335,6 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *msg)

/* first validate each transfer */
list_for_each_entry(t, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
- if (t->bits_per_word) {
- if (t->bits_per_word < 4 || t->bits_per_word > 16)
- return -EINVAL;
- }
if (t->speed_hz && t->speed_hz < espi->min_rate)
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -1022,6 +1012,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
master->bus_num = pdev->id;
master->num_chipselect = info->num_chipselect;
master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH;
+ master->bits_per_word_mask = 0xfff8; /* 16 to 4 bits per word */

platform_set_drvdata(pdev, master);

--
1.8.1.4


2013-06-30 16:14:55

by Mika Westerberg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] spi: spi-ep93xx: use bits_per_word_mask

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:43:07AM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> This driver supports 16 to 4 bits per work. Set the bits_per_word_mask
> to allows the spi core to handle validation.
>
> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ryan Mallon <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
> Cc: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 11 +----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
> index c633cd0..93ae7b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
> @@ -272,12 +272,6 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
> struct ep93xx_spi_chip *chip;
>
> - if (spi->bits_per_word < 4 || spi->bits_per_word > 16) {
> - dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "invalid bits per word %d\n",
> - spi->bits_per_word);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> chip = spi_get_ctldata(spi);
> if (!chip) {
> dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "initial setup for %s\n",
> @@ -341,10 +335,6 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *msg)
>
> /* first validate each transfer */
> list_for_each_entry(t, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
> - if (t->bits_per_word) {
> - if (t->bits_per_word < 4 || t->bits_per_word > 16)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> if (t->speed_hz && t->speed_hz < espi->min_rate)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -1022,6 +1012,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> master->bus_num = pdev->id;
> master->num_chipselect = info->num_chipselect;
> master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH;
> + master->bits_per_word_mask = 0xfff8; /* 16 to 4 bits per word */

Please use SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(4, 16) here.

2013-07-01 18:24:56

by Hartley Sweeten

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/8] spi: spi-ep93xx: use bits_per_word_mask

On Sunday, June 30, 2013 9:14 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:43:07AM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> This driver supports 16 to 4 bits per work. Set the bits_per_word_mask
>> to allows the spi core to handle validation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Ryan Mallon <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c | 11 +----------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
>> index c633cd0..93ae7b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ep93xx.c
>> @@ -272,12 +272,6 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
>> struct ep93xx_spi *espi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
>> struct ep93xx_spi_chip *chip;
>>
>> - if (spi->bits_per_word < 4 || spi->bits_per_word > 16) {
>> - dev_err(&espi->pdev->dev, "invalid bits per word %d\n",
>> - spi->bits_per_word);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> -
>> chip = spi_get_ctldata(spi);
>> if (!chip) {
>> dev_dbg(&espi->pdev->dev, "initial setup for %s\n",
>> @@ -341,10 +335,6 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *msg)
>>
>> /* first validate each transfer */
>> list_for_each_entry(t, &msg->transfers, transfer_list) {
>> - if (t->bits_per_word) {
>> - if (t->bits_per_word < 4 || t->bits_per_word > 16)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> if (t->speed_hz && t->speed_hz < espi->min_rate)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> @@ -1022,6 +1012,7 @@ static int ep93xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> master->bus_num = pdev->id;
>> master->num_chipselect = info->num_chipselect;
>> master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH;
>> + master->bits_per_word_mask = 0xfff8; /* 16 to 4 bits per word */
>
> Please use SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(4, 16) here.

I thought there was a macro for this, just couldn't find it. I'll fix this.

Thanks,
Hartley

2013-07-01 18:30:05

by Hartley Sweeten

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/8] spi: spi-ep93xx: use bits_per_word_mask

On Monday, July 01, 2013 11:23 AM, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Sunday, June 30, 2013 9:14 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> Please use SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(4, 16) here.
>
> I thought there was a macro for this, just couldn't find it. I'll fix this.

Doh... This patch is already in linux-next.

I'll need to rebase this series.

Regards,
Hartley