The SDHC controller in the imx8mn and imx8mp have the same controller
as the imx8mm which is slightly different than that of the imx7d.
Using the fallback of the imx8mm enables the controllers to support
HS400-ES which is not available on the imx7d.
Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <[email protected]>
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
index 7dbbcae9485c..d6ea73d76bdd 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
@@ -39,14 +39,14 @@ properties:
- items:
- enum:
- fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
- - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc
- - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc
- fsl,imx8mq-usdhc
- fsl,imx8qm-usdhc
- fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc
- const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc
- items:
- enum:
+ - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc
+ - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc
- fsl,imx93-usdhc
- fsl,imx8ulp-usdhc
- const: fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
--
2.34.1
On 23/03/2022 14:40, Adam Ford wrote:
> The SDHC controller in the imx8mn and imx8mp have the same controller
> as the imx8mm which is slightly different than that of the imx7d.
> Using the fallback of the imx8mm enables the controllers to support
> HS400-ES which is not available on the imx7d.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <[email protected]>
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> index 7dbbcae9485c..d6ea73d76bdd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> @@ -39,14 +39,14 @@ properties:
> - items:
> - enum:
> - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
Your change looks reasonable, but why imx8mm is compatible with imx7d?
> - - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc
> - - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc
> - fsl,imx8mq-usdhc
> - fsl,imx8qm-usdhc
> - fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc
> - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc
> - items:
> - enum:
> + - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc
> + - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc
> - fsl,imx93-usdhc
> - fsl,imx8ulp-usdhc
> - const: fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
Best regards,
Krzysztof
The SDHC controller in the imx8mn has the same controller
as the imx8mm which supports HS400-ES. Change the compatible
fallback to imx8mm to enable it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <[email protected]>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi
index 99f0f5026674..959285c3fee0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mn.dtsi
@@ -933,7 +933,7 @@ mu: mailbox@30aa0000 {
};
usdhc1: mmc@30b40000 {
- compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc";
+ compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-usdhc", "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc";
reg = <0x30b40000 0x10000>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 22 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
clocks = <&clk IMX8MN_CLK_IPG_ROOT>,
@@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ usdhc1: mmc@30b40000 {
};
usdhc2: mmc@30b50000 {
- compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc";
+ compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-usdhc", "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc";
reg = <0x30b50000 0x10000>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 23 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
clocks = <&clk IMX8MN_CLK_IPG_ROOT>,
@@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ usdhc2: mmc@30b50000 {
};
usdhc3: mmc@30b60000 {
- compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc";
+ compatible = "fsl,imx8mn-usdhc", "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc";
reg = <0x30b60000 0x10000>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
clocks = <&clk IMX8MN_CLK_IPG_ROOT>,
--
2.34.1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Ford [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 2022年3月24日 1:23
> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> Cc: arm-soc <[email protected]>; Adam Ford-BE
> <[email protected]>; Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>; Rob
> Herring <[email protected]>; Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>;
> Shawn Guo <[email protected]>; Sascha Hauer
> <[email protected]>; Pengutronix Kernel Team
> <[email protected]>; Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>;
> dl-linux-imx <[email protected]>; linux-mmc <[email protected]>;
> devicetree <[email protected]>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: imx-esdhc: Change imx8mn and
> imx8mp compatible fallback
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 9:11 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 23/03/2022 15:00, Adam Ford wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 8:56 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 23/03/2022 14:40, Adam Ford wrote:
> > >>> The SDHC controller in the imx8mn and imx8mp have the same
> > >>> controller as the imx8mm which is slightly different than that of the
> imx7d.
> > >>> Using the fallback of the imx8mm enables the controllers to
> > >>> support HS400-ES which is not available on the imx7d.
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <[email protected]>
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git
> > >>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > >>> index 7dbbcae9485c..d6ea73d76bdd 100644
> > >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > >>> @@ -39,14 +39,14 @@ properties:
> > >>> - items:
> > >>> - enum:
> > >>> - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
> > >>
> > >> Your change looks reasonable, but why imx8mm is compatible with imx7d?
> > >
> > > I saw that, and I wasn't sure the best way to go about fixing it.
> > > If I move the 8mm out of the imx7d category, do I need to add it to
> > > the enum list associated with the imx8mm, or can I just delete it
> > > from the enum leaving the const for imx8mm good enough?
> > >
> >
> > The DTS is using:
> > compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc"
> > which looks incorrect, based on what you wrote in commit description.
> > Since fsl,imx8mm-usdhc has its own compatibility-group and defines the
> > properties for entire family (imx8mm + imx8mn + imx8mp), then I would
> > assume that either fsl,imx8mm-usdhc is not be compatible with imx7d or
> > everything is compatible with imx7d. IOW, DTS and bindings should be
> > changed to one of following:
> > 1. Everything compatible with imx7d:
> > compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc";
> > compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-usdhc", "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc",
> > "fsl,imx7d-usdhc";
> >
> > 2. A new group:
> > compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc";
> > compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-usdhc", "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc";
> >
> > Which one, I am not sure. My commit 80fd350b95 organized it in (1)
> > approach, because also that time there was no new group for 8mm (added
> > in commit 431fae8). I assume NXP engineer knows better, so the better
> > solution would be (2). In such case, imx8mm has to be moved to the
> > first enum and all DTS have to be adjusted.
>
> I pulled NXP's downtream kernel based on 5.15.y, and grepped the code for
> imx8mm-usdhc. It looks like the imx8mm, imx8mn, imx8mp, and imx8ulp use
> the imx8mm compatible flag.
> The imx8mq uses the older imx7d. I'll do a second revision later today or
> tomorrow. Looking inside the driver, it appears there are some other quirks
> that different between the imx7d and imx8mm beyond just support for
> HS400-ES, so I think your option 2 is appropriate.
> Hopefully someone from NXP can comment.
>
I think better to change like this, and dts need change accordingly.
compatible:
oneOf:
- enum:
- fsl,imx25-esdhc
- fsl,imx35-esdhc
- fsl,imx51-esdhc
- fsl,imx53-esdhc
- fsl,imx6q-usdhc
- fsl,imx6sl-usdhc
- fsl,imx6sll-usdhc
- fsl,imx6sx-usdhc
- fsl,imx6ull-usdhc
- fsl,imx7d-usdhc
- fsl,imx7ulp-usdhc
- fsl,imxrt1050-usdhc
- fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
- fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc
- nxp,s32g2-usdhc
- items:
- enum:
- fsl,imx8mq-usdhc
- const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc
- items:
- enum:
- fsl,imx93-usdhc
- fsl,imx8ulp-usdhc
- fsl,imx8mn-usdhc
- fsl,imx8mp-usdhc
- const: fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
- items:
- enum:
- fsl,imx8qm-usdhc
- const: fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc
Best Regards
Haibo Chen
> adam
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 9:11 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 23/03/2022 15:00, Adam Ford wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 8:56 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 23/03/2022 14:40, Adam Ford wrote:
> >>> The SDHC controller in the imx8mn and imx8mp have the same controller
> >>> as the imx8mm which is slightly different than that of the imx7d.
> >>> Using the fallback of the imx8mm enables the controllers to support
> >>> HS400-ES which is not available on the imx7d.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> >>> index 7dbbcae9485c..d6ea73d76bdd 100644
> >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> >>> @@ -39,14 +39,14 @@ properties:
> >>> - items:
> >>> - enum:
> >>> - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc
> >>
> >> Your change looks reasonable, but why imx8mm is compatible with imx7d?
> >
> > I saw that, and I wasn't sure the best way to go about fixing it. If
> > I move the 8mm out of the imx7d category, do I need to add it to the
> > enum list associated with the imx8mm, or can I just delete it from the
> > enum leaving the const for imx8mm good enough?
> >
>
> The DTS is using:
> compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc"
> which looks incorrect, based on what you wrote in commit description.
> Since fsl,imx8mm-usdhc has its own compatibility-group and defines the
> properties for entire family (imx8mm + imx8mn + imx8mp), then I would
> assume that either fsl,imx8mm-usdhc is not be compatible with imx7d or
> everything is compatible with imx7d. IOW, DTS and bindings should be
> changed to one of following:
> 1. Everything compatible with imx7d:
> compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc";
> compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-usdhc", "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc", "fsl,imx7d-usdhc";
>
> 2. A new group:
> compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc";
> compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-usdhc", "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc";
>
> Which one, I am not sure. My commit 80fd350b95 organized it in (1)
> approach, because also that time there was no new group for 8mm (added
> in commit 431fae8). I assume NXP engineer knows better, so the better
> solution would be (2). In such case, imx8mm has to be moved to the first
> enum and all DTS have to be adjusted.
I pulled NXP's downtream kernel based on 5.15.y, and grepped the code
for imx8mm-usdhc. It looks like the imx8mm, imx8mn, imx8mp, and
imx8ulp use the imx8mm compatible flag.
The imx8mq uses the older imx7d. I'll do a second revision later
today or tomorrow. Looking inside the driver, it appears there are
some other quirks that different between the imx7d and imx8mm beyond
just support for HS400-ES, so I think your option 2 is appropriate.
Hopefully someone from NXP can comment.
adam
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof