Hello,
this patchset removes behaviour, where error code returned from any
transport was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as
patch from Bobby Eshleman:
commit c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"),
but for receive calls.
vsock_test suite is also updated.
Arseniy Krasnov (2):
vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket
vsock/test: update expected return values
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
This removes behaviour, where error code returned from any transport
was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as:
commit
c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"),
but for receive calls.
Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]>
---
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 19aea7cba26e..9262e0b77d47 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
if (read < 0) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
+ err = read;
break;
}
@@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
if (msg_len < 0) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
+ err = msg_len;
goto out;
}
--
2.25.1
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:13:11AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>This removes behaviour, where error code returned from any transport
>was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as:
>commit
>c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"),
>but for receive calls.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index 19aea7cba26e..9262e0b77d47 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>
> read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
In vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() vmci_qpair_peekv() and
vmci_qpair_dequev() return VMCI_ERROR_* in case of errors.
Maybe we should return -ENOMEM in vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() if
those functions fail to keep the same behavior.
CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and [email protected]
The other transports seem okay to me.
Thanks,
Stefano
> if (read < 0) {
>- err = -ENOMEM;
>+ err = read;
> break;
> }
>
>@@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
>
> if (msg_len < 0) {
>- err = -ENOMEM;
>+ err = msg_len;
> goto out;
> }
>
>--
>2.25.1
>
I pressed send too early...
CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and [email protected]
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:39 AM Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:13:11AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> >This removes behaviour, where error code returned from any transport
> >was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as:
> >commit
> >c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"),
> >but for receive calls.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]>
> >---
> > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >index 19aea7cba26e..9262e0b77d47 100644
> >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >@@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> >
> > read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
>
> In vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() vmci_qpair_peekv() and
> vmci_qpair_dequev() return VMCI_ERROR_* in case of errors.
>
> Maybe we should return -ENOMEM in vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() if
> those functions fail to keep the same behavior.
>
> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and [email protected]
>
> The other transports seem okay to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
> > if (read < 0) {
> >- err = -ENOMEM;
> >+ err = read;
> > break;
> > }
> >
> >@@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> > msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
> >
> > if (msg_len < 0) {
> >- err = -ENOMEM;
> >+ err = msg_len;
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> >--
> >2.25.1
> >
On 28.03.2023 12:42, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> I pressed send too early...
>
> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and [email protected]
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:39 AM Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:13:11AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>> This removes behaviour, where error code returned from any transport
>>> was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as:
>>> commit
>>> c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"),
>>> but for receive calls.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>> index 19aea7cba26e..9262e0b77d47 100644
>>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>> @@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>>
>>> read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
>>
>> In vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() vmci_qpair_peekv() and
>> vmci_qpair_dequev() return VMCI_ERROR_* in case of errors.
>>
>> Maybe we should return -ENOMEM in vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() if
>> those functions fail to keep the same behavior.
Yes, seems i missed it, because several months ago we had similar question for send
logic:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4611091.html
And it was ok to not handle VMCI send path in this way. So i think current implementation
for tx is a little bit buggy, because VMCI specific error from 'vmci_qpair_enquev()' is
returned to af_vsock.c. I think error conversion must be added to VMCI transport for tx
also.
Good thing is that Hyper-V uses general error codes.
Thanks, Arseniy
>>
>> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and [email protected]
>>
>> The other transports seem okay to me.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefano
>>
>>> if (read < 0) {
>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>> + err = read;
>>> break;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>> msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
>>>
>>> if (msg_len < 0) {
>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>> + err = msg_len;
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.25.1
>>>
>
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 01:42:19PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>
>
>On 28.03.2023 12:42, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> I pressed send too early...
>>
>> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and [email protected]
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:39 AM Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:13:11AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>> This removes behaviour, where error code returned from any transport
>>>> was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as:
>>>> commit
>>>> c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"),
>>>> but for receive calls.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>> index 19aea7cba26e..9262e0b77d47 100644
>>>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>> @@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>>>
>>>> read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
>>>
>>> In vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() vmci_qpair_peekv() and
>>> vmci_qpair_dequev() return VMCI_ERROR_* in case of errors.
>>>
>>> Maybe we should return -ENOMEM in vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() if
>>> those functions fail to keep the same behavior.
>
>Yes, seems i missed it, because several months ago we had similar question for send
>logic:
>https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4611091.html
>And it was ok to not handle VMCI send path in this way. So i think current implementation
>for tx is a little bit buggy, because VMCI specific error from 'vmci_qpair_enquev()' is
>returned to af_vsock.c. I think error conversion must be added to VMCI transport for tx
>also.
Good point!
These are negative values, so there are no big problems, but I don't
know what the user expects in this case.
@Vishnu Do we want to return an errno to the user or a VMCI_ERROR_*?
In both cases I think we should do the same for both enqueue and
dequeue.
>
>Good thing is that Hyper-V uses general error codes.
Yeah!
Thanks,
Stefano
>
>Thanks, Arseniy
>>>
>>> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and [email protected]
>>>
>>> The other transports seem okay to me.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Stefano
>>>
>>>> if (read < 0) {
>>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>>> + err = read;
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>>> msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
>>>>
>>>> if (msg_len < 0) {
>>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>>> + err = msg_len;
>>>> goto out;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
>>
>
On 28.03.2023 14:19, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 01:42:19PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28.03.2023 12:42, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> I pressed send too early...
>>>
>>> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and [email protected]
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:39 AM Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:13:11AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>> This removes behaviour, where error code returned from any transport
>>>>> was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as:
>>>>> commit
>>>>> c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"),
>>>>> but for receive calls.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>>> index 19aea7cba26e..9262e0b77d47 100644
>>>>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>>> @@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>>>>
>>>>> read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
>>>>
>>>> In vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() vmci_qpair_peekv() and
>>>> vmci_qpair_dequev() return VMCI_ERROR_* in case of errors.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we should return -ENOMEM in vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() if
>>>> those functions fail to keep the same behavior.
>>
>> Yes, seems i missed it, because several months ago we had similar question for send
>> logic:
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4611091.html
>> And it was ok to not handle VMCI send path in this way. So i think current implementation
>> for tx is a little bit buggy, because VMCI specific error from 'vmci_qpair_enquev()' is
>> returned to af_vsock.c. I think error conversion must be added to VMCI transport for tx
>> also.
>
> Good point!
>
> These are negative values, so there are no big problems, but I don't
> know what the user expects in this case.
>
> @Vishnu Do we want to return an errno to the user or a VMCI_ERROR_*?
Small remark, as i can see, VMCI_ERROR_ is not exported to user in include/uapi,
so IIUC user won't be able to interpret such values correctly.
Thanks, Arseniy
>
> In both cases I think we should do the same for both enqueue and
> dequeue.
>
>>
>> Good thing is that Hyper-V uses general error codes.
>
> Yeah!
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
>>
>> Thanks, Arseniy
>>>>
>>>> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> The other transports seem okay to me.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Stefano
>>>>
>>>>> if (read < 0) {
>>>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>>>> + err = read;
>>>>> break;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>>>> msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
>>>>>
>>>>> if (msg_len < 0) {
>>>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>>>> + err = msg_len;
>>>>> goto out;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> On Mar 28, 2023, at 4:20 AM, Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> !! External Email
>
> On 28.03.2023 14:19, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 01:42:19PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28.03.2023 12:42, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>>> I pressed send too early...
>>>>
>>>> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:39 AM Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:13:11AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>>> This removes behaviour, where error code returned from any transport
>>>>>> was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as:
>>>>>> commit
>>>>>> c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"),
>>>>>> but for receive calls.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>>>> index 19aea7cba26e..9262e0b77d47 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>>>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>>>> @@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
>>>>>
>>>>> In vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() vmci_qpair_peekv() and
>>>>> vmci_qpair_dequev() return VMCI_ERROR_* in case of errors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe we should return -ENOMEM in vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() if
>>>>> those functions fail to keep the same behavior.
>>>
>>> Yes, seems i missed it, because several months ago we had similar question for send
>>> logic:
>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Fkernel%2Fmsg4611091.html&data=05%7C01%7Cvdasa%40vmware.com%7C3b17793425384debe75708db2f7eec8c%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638155994413494900%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=MMfFcKuFFvMcJrbToKvWvIB%2FZmzp%2BdGGVWFVWztuSzg%3D&reserved=0
>>> And it was ok to not handle VMCI send path in this way. So i think current implementation
>>> for tx is a little bit buggy, because VMCI specific error from 'vmci_qpair_enquev()' is
>>> returned to af_vsock.c. I think error conversion must be added to VMCI transport for tx
>>> also.
>>
>> Good point!
>>
>> These are negative values, so there are no big problems, but I don't
>> know what the user expects in this case.
>>
>> @Vishnu Do we want to return an errno to the user or a VMCI_ERROR_*?
>
> Small remark, as i can see, VMCI_ERROR_ is not exported to user in include/uapi,
> so IIUC user won't be able to interpret such values correctly.
>
> Thanks, Arseniy
Let's just return -ENOMEM from vmci transport in case of error in
vmci_transport_stream_enqueue and vmci_transport_stream_dequeue.
@Arseniy,
Could you please add a separate patch in this set to handle the above?
Thanks,
Vishnu
>
>>
>> In both cases I think we should do the same for both enqueue and
>> dequeue.
>>
>>>
>>> Good thing is that Hyper-V uses general error codes.
>>
>> Yeah!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefano
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, Arseniy
>>>>>
>>>>> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> The other transports seem okay to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Stefano
>>>>>
>>>>>> if (read < 0) {
>>>>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>>>>> + err = read;
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>>>>> msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (msg_len < 0) {
>>>>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>>>>> + err = msg_len;
>>>>>> goto out;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> !! External Email: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
On 30.03.2023 00:44, Vishnu Dasa wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 28, 2023, at 4:20 AM, Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> !! External Email
>>
>> On 28.03.2023 14:19, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 01:42:19PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28.03.2023 12:42, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>>>> I pressed send too early...
>>>>>
>>>>> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:39 AM Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:13:11AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>>>> This removes behaviour, where error code returned from any transport
>>>>>>> was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as:
>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>> c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"),
>>>>>>> but for receive calls.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>>>>> index 19aea7cba26e..9262e0b77d47 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>>>>> @@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() vmci_qpair_peekv() and
>>>>>> vmci_qpair_dequev() return VMCI_ERROR_* in case of errors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe we should return -ENOMEM in vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() if
>>>>>> those functions fail to keep the same behavior.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, seems i missed it, because several months ago we had similar question for send
>>>> logic:
>>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Fkernel%2Fmsg4611091.html&data=05%7C01%7Cvdasa%40vmware.com%7C3b17793425384debe75708db2f7eec8c%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638155994413494900%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=MMfFcKuFFvMcJrbToKvWvIB%2FZmzp%2BdGGVWFVWztuSzg%3D&reserved=0
>>>> And it was ok to not handle VMCI send path in this way. So i think current implementation
>>>> for tx is a little bit buggy, because VMCI specific error from 'vmci_qpair_enquev()' is
>>>> returned to af_vsock.c. I think error conversion must be added to VMCI transport for tx
>>>> also.
>>>
>>> Good point!
>>>
>>> These are negative values, so there are no big problems, but I don't
>>> know what the user expects in this case.
>>>
>>> @Vishnu Do we want to return an errno to the user or a VMCI_ERROR_*?
>>
>> Small remark, as i can see, VMCI_ERROR_ is not exported to user in include/uapi,
>> so IIUC user won't be able to interpret such values correctly.
>>
>> Thanks, Arseniy
>
> Let's just return -ENOMEM from vmci transport in case of error in
> vmci_transport_stream_enqueue and vmci_transport_stream_dequeue.
>
> @Arseniy,
> Could you please add a separate patch in this set to handle the above?
Sure, ack, in the next few days!
Thanks, Arseniy
>
> Thanks,
> Vishnu
>
>>
>>>
>>> In both cases I think we should do the same for both enqueue and
>>> dequeue.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good thing is that Hyper-V uses general error codes.
>>>
>>> Yeah!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Stefano
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Arseniy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The other transports seem okay to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Stefano
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if (read < 0) {
>>>>>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>>>>>> + err = read;
>>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>>>>>> msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if (msg_len < 0) {
>>>>>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>>>>>> + err = msg_len;
>>>>>>> goto out;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> !! External Email: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
>
>