Hi all,
Looking through the trees currently included in linux-next, I get the
feeling that some of them may be obsolete.
Here is a list of tree that had no commits in them at the openning of the
previous two merge windows:
linux-spec
pxa
galak
ceph
configfs
jfs
squashfs
vfs-scale
kconfig
ide
powertools
swiotlb
input-mt
lsm
embedded
firmware
backlight
uclinux
hdlc
lblnet
bdev
cputime
jc_docs
nommu
audit
irda
i7300_edac
gpio
xen
sfi
asm-generic
hwpoison
sysctl
slabh
scsi-post-merge
I have no problem with including trees that are only used now and then,
but if any of the above have fullfilled their need, please let me know
and I will remove them. (In some cases being in the above list may just
mean that the proicess is not working very well and things are not being
included in linux-next before the merge window opens.)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Hello, Stephen.
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:06:16AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> slabh
This definitely is a dead branch. It was a temporary testing branch
preparing for wide-scale update and the whole thing has been in
mainline for a very long time now. Sorry about not updating it
earlier.
Thank you.
--
tejun
Hi Tejun,
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:12:15 +0900 Tejun Heo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:06:16AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > slabh
>
> This definitely is a dead branch. It was a temporary testing branch
> preparing for wide-scale update and the whole thing has been in
> mainline for a very long time now. Sorry about not updating it
> earlier.
Thanks, I will remove it.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Looking through the trees currently included in linux-next, I get the
> feeling that some of them may be obsolete.
>
> Here is a list of tree that had no commits in them at the openning of the
> previous two merge windows:
>
> linux-spec
> pxa
> galak
> ceph
> configfs
> jfs
> squashfs
This is a surprise ... I'm sure I had commits in my squashfs
linux-next tree at the opening of the last but one merge window...
Linux 2.6.38 released 14 Mar 2011
$ git log --pretty="%ci %s"
...
2011-02-28 18:43:48 +0000 Squashfs: wrap squashfs_mount() definition
2011-02-28 18:35:44 +0000 Squashfs: xz_wrapper doesn't need to include squashfs_
2011-02-28 18:35:36 +0000 Squashfs: Update documentation to include compression
2011-02-28 18:35:28 +0000 Squashfs: Update Kconfig help text to include xz compr
2011-02-28 18:34:24 +0000 Squashfs: add compression options support to xz decomp
2011-02-28 18:21:59 +0000 Squashfs: extend decompressor framework to handle comp
2011-02-07 16:03:55 -0800 Linux 2.6.38-rc4
Phillip
Hi Phillip,
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:26:07 +0100 Phillip Lougher <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > squashfs
>
> This is a surprise ... I'm sure I had commits in my squashfs
> linux-next tree at the opening of the last but one merge window...
>
> Linux 2.6.38 released 14 Mar 2011
>
> $ git log --pretty="%ci %s"
> ...
> 2011-02-28 18:43:48 +0000 Squashfs: wrap squashfs_mount() definition
> 2011-02-28 18:35:44 +0000 Squashfs: xz_wrapper doesn't need to include squashfs_
> 2011-02-28 18:35:36 +0000 Squashfs: Update documentation to include compression
> 2011-02-28 18:35:28 +0000 Squashfs: Update Kconfig help text to include xz compr
> 2011-02-28 18:34:24 +0000 Squashfs: add compression options support to xz decomp
> 2011-02-28 18:21:59 +0000 Squashfs: extend decompressor framework to handle comp
> 2011-02-07 16:03:55 -0800 Linux 2.6.38-rc4
plus or minus 1 day (and timezone jitter :-)):
$ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110314/origin..next/20110314/squashfs | wc -l
0
$ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110315/origin..next/20110315/squashfs | wc -l
0
$ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110316/origin..next/20110316/squashfs | wc -l
6
It doesn't really matter, it was just a quick metric to choose a subset
of trees to look at.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Phillip,
>
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:26:07 +0100 Phillip Lougher <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > squashfs
>>
>> This is a surprise ... I'm sure I had commits in my squashfs
>> linux-next tree at the opening of the last but one merge window...
>>
>> Linux 2.6.38 released 14 Mar 2011
>>
>> $ git log --pretty="%ci %s"
>> ...
>> 2011-02-28 18:43:48 +0000 Squashfs: wrap squashfs_mount() definition
>> 2011-02-28 18:35:44 +0000 Squashfs: xz_wrapper doesn't need to include squashfs_
>> 2011-02-28 18:35:36 +0000 Squashfs: Update documentation to include compression
>> 2011-02-28 18:35:28 +0000 Squashfs: Update Kconfig help text to include xz compr
>> 2011-02-28 18:34:24 +0000 Squashfs: add compression options support to xz decomp
>> 2011-02-28 18:21:59 +0000 Squashfs: extend decompressor framework to handle comp
>> 2011-02-07 16:03:55 -0800 Linux 2.6.38-rc4
>
> plus or minus 1 day (and timezone jitter :-)):
>
> $ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110314/origin..next/20110314/squashfs | wc -l
> 0
> $ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110315/origin..next/20110315/squashfs | wc -l
> 0
> $ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110316/origin..next/20110316/squashfs | wc -l
> 6
>
Bugger, maybe I forgot to push, though I thought I did :-)
Phillip
> It doesn't really matter, it was just a quick metric to choose a subset
> of trees to look at.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? [email protected]
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
>