2011-04-20 09:19:52

by John Sung

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] HID: add support for PenMount dual-touch panel

This patch adds PenMount support to hid-multitouch.
A new class MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE is defined for PenMount,
since it uses HID_DG_CONFIDENCE as the valid flag.
A new quirk MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE is defined,
since PenMount uses serial reporting mode and there is no
HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT usage in it's report descriptor.

Signed-off-by: PenMount <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
---
drivers/hid/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 1 +
drivers/hid/hid-ids.h | 3 +++
drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/Kconfig b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
index 996ae3a..8058cf1 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
@@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ config HID_MULTITOUCH
- Cypress TrueTouch panels
- Hanvon dual touch panels
- IrTouch Infrared USB panels
+ - PenMount dual touch panels
- Pixcir dual touch panels
- 'Sensing Win7-TwoFinger' panel by GeneralTouch
- eGalax dual-touch panels, including the
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
index c3d6626..6e31b9f 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
@@ -1438,6 +1438,7 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_have_special_driver[] = {
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_NTRIG, USB_DEVICE_ID_NTRIG_TOUCH_SCREEN_18) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ORTEK, USB_DEVICE_ID_ORTEK_PKB1700) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ORTEK, USB_DEVICE_ID_ORTEK_WKB2000) },
+ { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PENMOUNT, USB_DEVICE_ID_PENMOUNT_PCI) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PETALYNX, USB_DEVICE_ID_PETALYNX_MAXTER_REMOTE) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_QUANTA, USB_DEVICE_ID_QUANTA_OPTICAL_TOUCH) },
{ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_QUANTA, USB_DEVICE_ID_PIXART_IMAGING_INC_OPTICAL_TOUCH_SCREEN) },
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
index d485894..a4d0505 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
@@ -487,6 +487,9 @@
#define USB_VENDOR_ID_PETALYNX 0x18b1
#define USB_DEVICE_ID_PETALYNX_MAXTER_REMOTE 0x0037

+#define USB_VENDOR_ID_PENMOUNT 0x14e1
+#define USB_DEVICE_ID_PENMOUNT_PCI 0x3500
+
#define USB_VENDOR_ID_PHILIPS 0x0471
#define USB_DEVICE_ID_PHILIPS_IEEE802154_DONGLE 0x0617

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
index 0175f85..c88d96d 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
#define MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_INRANGE (1 << 4)
#define MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_CONFIDENCE (1 << 5)
#define MT_QUIRK_EGALAX_XYZ_FIXUP (1 << 6)
+#define MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE (1 << 7)

struct mt_slot {
__s32 x, y, p, w, h;
@@ -89,6 +90,7 @@ struct mt_class {
#define MT_CLS_EGALAX 5
#define MT_CLS_STANTUM 6
#define MT_CLS_3M 7
+#define MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE 8

#define MT_DEFAULT_MAXCONTACT 10

@@ -156,6 +158,9 @@ struct mt_class mt_classes[] = {
.sn_move = 2048,
.sn_width = 128,
.sn_height = 128 },
+ { .name = MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE,
+ .quirks = MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_CONFIDENCE |
+ MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE },

{ }
};
@@ -196,6 +201,10 @@ static int mt_input_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
struct mt_class *cls = td->mtclass;
__s32 quirks = cls->quirks;

+ if ((quirks & MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE) &&
+ (!td->last_field_index))
+ td->last_field_index = field->report->maxfield - 1;
+
switch (usage->hid & HID_USAGE_PAGE) {

case HID_UP_GENDESK:
@@ -585,6 +594,11 @@ static const struct hid_device_id mt_devices[] = {
HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_IRTOUCHSYSTEMS,
USB_DEVICE_ID_IRTOUCH_INFRARED_USB) },

+ /* PenMount panels */
+ { .driver_data = MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE,
+ HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PENMOUNT,
+ USB_DEVICE_ID_PENMOUNT_PCI) },
+
/* PixCir-based panels */
{ .driver_data = MT_CLS_DUAL_INRANGE_CONTACTID,
HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_HANVON,
--
1.7.4.1


2011-04-20 09:45:17

by Henrik Rydberg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: add support for PenMount dual-touch panel

Hi,

thanks for the patch. Please find comments inline.

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 05:19:15PM +0800, PenMount wrote:
> This patch adds PenMount support to hid-multitouch.
> A new class MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE is defined for PenMount,
> since it uses HID_DG_CONFIDENCE as the valid flag.
> A new quirk MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE is defined,
> since PenMount uses serial reporting mode and there is no
> HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT usage in it's report descriptor.
>
> Signed-off-by: PenMount <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/hid/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 1 +
> drivers/hid/hid-ids.h | 3 +++
> drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/Kconfig b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> index 996ae3a..8058cf1 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
> @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ config HID_MULTITOUCH
> - Cypress TrueTouch panels
> - Hanvon dual touch panels
> - IrTouch Infrared USB panels
> + - PenMount dual touch panels
> - Pixcir dual touch panels
> - 'Sensing Win7-TwoFinger' panel by GeneralTouch
> - eGalax dual-touch panels, including the
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> index c3d6626..6e31b9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> @@ -1438,6 +1438,7 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_have_special_driver[] = {
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_NTRIG, USB_DEVICE_ID_NTRIG_TOUCH_SCREEN_18) },
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ORTEK, USB_DEVICE_ID_ORTEK_PKB1700) },
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ORTEK, USB_DEVICE_ID_ORTEK_WKB2000) },
> + { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PENMOUNT, USB_DEVICE_ID_PENMOUNT_PCI) },
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PETALYNX, USB_DEVICE_ID_PETALYNX_MAXTER_REMOTE) },
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_QUANTA, USB_DEVICE_ID_QUANTA_OPTICAL_TOUCH) },
> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_QUANTA, USB_DEVICE_ID_PIXART_IMAGING_INC_OPTICAL_TOUCH_SCREEN) },
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
> index d485894..a4d0505 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
> @@ -487,6 +487,9 @@
> #define USB_VENDOR_ID_PETALYNX 0x18b1
> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_PETALYNX_MAXTER_REMOTE 0x0037
>
> +#define USB_VENDOR_ID_PENMOUNT 0x14e1
> +#define USB_DEVICE_ID_PENMOUNT_PCI 0x3500
> +
> #define USB_VENDOR_ID_PHILIPS 0x0471
> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_PHILIPS_IEEE802154_DONGLE 0x0617
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
> index 0175f85..c88d96d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> #define MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_INRANGE (1 << 4)
> #define MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_CONFIDENCE (1 << 5)
> #define MT_QUIRK_EGALAX_XYZ_FIXUP (1 << 6)
> +#define MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE (1 << 7)
>
> struct mt_slot {
> __s32 x, y, p, w, h;
> @@ -89,6 +90,7 @@ struct mt_class {
> #define MT_CLS_EGALAX 5
> #define MT_CLS_STANTUM 6
> #define MT_CLS_3M 7
> +#define MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE 8
>
> #define MT_DEFAULT_MAXCONTACT 10
>
> @@ -156,6 +158,9 @@ struct mt_class mt_classes[] = {
> .sn_move = 2048,
> .sn_width = 128,
> .sn_height = 128 },
> + { .name = MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE,
> + .quirks = MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_CONFIDENCE |
> + MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE },
>
> { }
> };
> @@ -196,6 +201,10 @@ static int mt_input_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
> struct mt_class *cls = td->mtclass;
> __s32 quirks = cls->quirks;
>
> + if ((quirks & MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE) &&
> + (!td->last_field_index))
> + td->last_field_index = field->report->maxfield - 1;
> +

Are the events not emitted automatically per touch, if the lines above are omitted?

> switch (usage->hid & HID_USAGE_PAGE) {
>
> case HID_UP_GENDESK:
> @@ -585,6 +594,11 @@ static const struct hid_device_id mt_devices[] = {
> HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_IRTOUCHSYSTEMS,
> USB_DEVICE_ID_IRTOUCH_INFRARED_USB) },
>
> + /* PenMount panels */
> + { .driver_data = MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE,
> + HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PENMOUNT,
> + USB_DEVICE_ID_PENMOUNT_PCI) },
> +
> /* PixCir-based panels */
> { .driver_data = MT_CLS_DUAL_INRANGE_CONTACTID,
> HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_HANVON,
> --
> 1.7.4.1
>

Benjamin: Since field->index == 0 is in use, it seems the driver could
execute event emission wrongly under some circumstances (when
last_field_index == 0). Is that related to the reason for the quirk in
this patch?

Thanks,
Henrik

2011-04-20 09:54:10

by Benjamin Tissoires

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: add support for PenMount dual-touch panel

Hi Henrik,



On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:47, Henrik Rydberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the patch. Please find comments inline.
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 05:19:15PM +0800, PenMount wrote:
>> This patch adds PenMount support to hid-multitouch.
>> A new class MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE is defined for PenMount,
>> since it uses HID_DG_CONFIDENCE as the valid flag.
>> A new quirk MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE is defined,
>> since PenMount uses serial reporting mode and there is no
>> HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT usage in it's report descriptor.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: PenMount <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> ?drivers/hid/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?1 +
>> ?drivers/hid/hid-core.c ? ? ? | ? ?1 +
>> ?drivers/hid/hid-ids.h ? ? ? ?| ? ?3 +++
>> ?drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | ? 14 ++++++++++++++
>> ?4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/Kconfig b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
>> index 996ae3a..8058cf1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hid/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/Kconfig
>> @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ config HID_MULTITOUCH
>> ? ? ? ? - Cypress TrueTouch panels
>> ? ? ? ? - Hanvon dual touch panels
>> ? ? ? ? - IrTouch Infrared USB panels
>> + ? ? ? - PenMount dual touch panels
>> ? ? ? ? - Pixcir dual touch panels
>> ? ? ? ? - 'Sensing Win7-TwoFinger' panel by GeneralTouch
>> ? ? ? ? ? ?- eGalax dual-touch panels, including the
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
>> index c3d6626..6e31b9f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
>> @@ -1438,6 +1438,7 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_have_special_driver[] = {
>> ? ? ? { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_NTRIG, USB_DEVICE_ID_NTRIG_TOUCH_SCREEN_18) },
>> ? ? ? { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ORTEK, USB_DEVICE_ID_ORTEK_PKB1700) },
>> ? ? ? { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ORTEK, USB_DEVICE_ID_ORTEK_WKB2000) },
>> + ? ? { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PENMOUNT, USB_DEVICE_ID_PENMOUNT_PCI) },
>> ? ? ? { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PETALYNX, USB_DEVICE_ID_PETALYNX_MAXTER_REMOTE) },
>> ? ? ? { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_QUANTA, USB_DEVICE_ID_QUANTA_OPTICAL_TOUCH) },
>> ? ? ? { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_QUANTA, USB_DEVICE_ID_PIXART_IMAGING_INC_OPTICAL_TOUCH_SCREEN) },
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
>> index d485894..a4d0505 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
>> @@ -487,6 +487,9 @@
>> ?#define USB_VENDOR_ID_PETALYNX ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0x18b1
>> ?#define USB_DEVICE_ID_PETALYNX_MAXTER_REMOTE 0x0037
>>
>> +#define USB_VENDOR_ID_PENMOUNT ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 0x14e1
>> +#define USB_DEVICE_ID_PENMOUNT_PCI ? 0x3500
>> +
>> ?#define USB_VENDOR_ID_PHILIPS ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0x0471
>> ?#define USB_DEVICE_ID_PHILIPS_IEEE802154_DONGLE 0x0617
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
>> index 0175f85..c88d96d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> ?#define MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_INRANGE ? ?(1 << 4)
>> ?#define MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_CONFIDENCE (1 << 5)
>> ?#define MT_QUIRK_EGALAX_XYZ_FIXUP ? ?(1 << 6)
>> +#define MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE ?(1 << 7)
>>
>> ?struct mt_slot {
>> ? ? ? __s32 x, y, p, w, h;
>> @@ -89,6 +90,7 @@ struct mt_class {
>> ?#define MT_CLS_EGALAX ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?5
>> ?#define MT_CLS_STANTUM ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 6
>> ?#define MT_CLS_3M ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?7
>> +#define MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?8
>>
>> ?#define MT_DEFAULT_MAXCONTACT ? ? ? ?10
>>
>> @@ -156,6 +158,9 @@ struct mt_class mt_classes[] = {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .sn_move = 2048,
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .sn_width = 128,
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? .sn_height = 128 },
>> + ? ? { .name = MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE,
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? .quirks = MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_CONFIDENCE |
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE },
>>
>> ? ? ? { }
>> ?};
>> @@ -196,6 +201,10 @@ static int mt_input_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
>> ? ? ? struct mt_class *cls = td->mtclass;
>> ? ? ? __s32 quirks = cls->quirks;
>>
>> + ? ? if ((quirks & MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE) &&
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? (!td->last_field_index))
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? td->last_field_index = field->report->maxfield - 1;
>> +
>
> Are the events not emitted automatically per touch, if the lines above are omitted?
>
>> ? ? ? switch (usage->hid & HID_USAGE_PAGE) {
>>
>> ? ? ? case HID_UP_GENDESK:
>> @@ -585,6 +594,11 @@ static const struct hid_device_id mt_devices[] = {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_IRTOUCHSYSTEMS,
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? USB_DEVICE_ID_IRTOUCH_INFRARED_USB) },
>>
>> + ? ? /* PenMount panels */
>> + ? ? { ?.driver_data = MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE,
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PENMOUNT,
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? USB_DEVICE_ID_PENMOUNT_PCI) },
>> +
>> ? ? ? /* PixCir-based panels */
>> ? ? ? { .driver_data = MT_CLS_DUAL_INRANGE_CONTACTID,
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_HANVON,
>> --
>> 1.7.4.1
>>
>
> Benjamin: Since field->index == 0 is in use, it seems the driver could
> execute event emission wrongly under some circumstances (when
> last_field_index == 0). Is that related to the reason for the quirk in
> this patch?

In fact, I have a second patch just on top of this one. It has been
tested by Ryan with PenMount devices.
I was waiting for Penmount to be included first as it does not impact
any other drivers.

I inline the code here, but my gmail client will destroy tabs (so I
attached it too)....

Can you test it against 3M?

Richard, can you test it (after applying the PenMount patch) too?

Thanks,
Benjamin

>From ac6b68d27b70e91846f2179d15804144dfab8bc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:49:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] HID: hid-multitouch: refactor last_field_index

the current implementation requires the devices to report
HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT to set the last_field_index value.
However, devices reporting in serial mode (DWAV and PenMount)
do not send this field.
Other devices (3M) add other fields in the reports descriptor
that are not multitouch related at the end, thus the need to
add a special case in the default case when handling events.

A first work around has been set up but with PenMount devices,
we have reached the limit.

The idea is to calculate the last_field_index by relying only on
multitouch fields the device send. This allows us to remove
the handling of non-multitouch events in hid-multitouch, and
guarantee that the function mt_emit_event is always called.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
---
drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 37 +++++++++++++++----------------------
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
index 5d4ba79..51b5d27 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
#define MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_INRANGE (1 << 4)
#define MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_CONFIDENCE (1 << 5)
#define MT_QUIRK_EGALAX_XYZ_FIXUP (1 << 6)
-#define MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE (1 << 7)

struct mt_slot {
__s32 x, y, p, w, h;
@@ -90,7 +89,7 @@ struct mt_class {
#define MT_CLS_EGALAX 5
#define MT_CLS_STANTUM 6
#define MT_CLS_3M 7
-#define MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE 8
+#define MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE 8

#define MT_DEFAULT_MAXCONTACT 10

@@ -158,9 +157,8 @@ struct mt_class mt_classes[] = {
.sn_move = 2048,
.sn_width = 128,
.sn_height = 128 },
- { .name = MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE,
- .quirks = MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_CONFIDENCE |
- MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE },
+ { .name = MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE,
+ .quirks = MT_QUIRK_VALID_IS_CONFIDENCE },

{ }
};
@@ -201,10 +199,6 @@ static int mt_input_mapping(struct hid_device
*hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
struct mt_class *cls = td->mtclass;
__s32 quirks = cls->quirks;

- if ((quirks & MT_QUIRK_SERIAL_REPORT_MODE) &&
- (!td->last_field_index))
- td->last_field_index = field->report->maxfield - 1;
-
switch (usage->hid & HID_USAGE_PAGE) {

case HID_UP_GENDESK:
@@ -219,6 +213,7 @@ static int mt_input_mapping(struct hid_device
*hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
/* touchscreen emulation */
set_abs(hi->input, ABS_X, field, cls->sn_move);
td->last_slot_field = usage->hid;
+ td->last_field_index = field->index;
return 1;
case HID_GD_Y:
if (quirks & MT_QUIRK_EGALAX_XYZ_FIXUP)
@@ -230,6 +225,7 @@ static int mt_input_mapping(struct hid_device
*hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
/* touchscreen emulation */
set_abs(hi->input, ABS_Y, field, cls->sn_move);
td->last_slot_field = usage->hid;
+ td->last_field_index = field->index;
return 1;
}
return 0;
@@ -238,18 +234,22 @@ static int mt_input_mapping(struct hid_device
*hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
switch (usage->hid) {
case HID_DG_INRANGE:
td->last_slot_field = usage->hid;
+ td->last_field_index = field->index;
return 1;
case HID_DG_CONFIDENCE:
td->last_slot_field = usage->hid;
+ td->last_field_index = field->index;
return 1;
case HID_DG_TIPSWITCH:
hid_map_usage(hi, usage, bit, max, EV_KEY, BTN_TOUCH);
input_set_capability(hi->input, EV_KEY, BTN_TOUCH);
td->last_slot_field = usage->hid;
+ td->last_field_index = field->index;
return 1;
case HID_DG_CONTACTID:
input_mt_init_slots(hi->input, td->maxcontacts);
td->last_slot_field = usage->hid;
+ td->last_field_index = field->index;
return 1;
case HID_DG_WIDTH:
hid_map_usage(hi, usage, bit, max,
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static int mt_input_mapping(struct hid_device
*hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
set_abs(hi->input, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, field,
cls->sn_width);
td->last_slot_field = usage->hid;
+ td->last_field_index = field->index;
return 1;
case HID_DG_HEIGHT:
hid_map_usage(hi, usage, bit, max,
@@ -266,6 +267,7 @@ static int mt_input_mapping(struct hid_device
*hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
input_set_abs_params(hi->input,
ABS_MT_ORIENTATION, 0, 1, 0, 0);
td->last_slot_field = usage->hid;
+ td->last_field_index = field->index;
return 1;
case HID_DG_TIPPRESSURE:
if (quirks & MT_QUIRK_EGALAX_XYZ_FIXUP)
@@ -278,13 +280,15 @@ static int mt_input_mapping(struct hid_device
*hdev, struct hid_input *hi,
set_abs(hi->input, ABS_PRESSURE, field,
cls->sn_pressure);
td->last_slot_field = usage->hid;
+ td->last_field_index = field->index;
return 1;
case HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT:
- td->last_field_index = field->report->maxfield - 1;
+ td->last_field_index = field->index;
return 1;
case HID_DG_CONTACTMAX:
/* we don't set td->last_slot_field as contactcount and
* contact max are global to the report */
+ td->last_field_index = field->index;
return -1;
}
/* let hid-input decide for the others */
@@ -433,23 +437,12 @@ static int mt_event(struct hid_device *hid,
struct hid_field *field,
break;

default:
- if (td->last_field_index
- && field->index == td->last_field_index)
- /* we reach here when the last field in the
- * report is not related to multitouch.
- * This is not good. As a temporary solution,
- * we trigger our mt event completion and
- * ignore the field.
- */
- break;
/* fallback to the generic hidinput handling */
return 0;
}

if (usage->hid == td->last_slot_field) {
mt_complete_slot(td);
- if (!td->last_field_index)
- mt_emit_event(td, field->hidinput->input);
}

if (field->index == td->last_field_index
@@ -595,7 +588,7 @@ static const struct hid_device_id mt_devices[] = {
USB_DEVICE_ID_IRTOUCH_INFRARED_USB) },

/* PenMount panels */
- { .driver_data = MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE_SERIAL_MODE,
+ { .driver_data = MT_CLS_CONFIDENCE,
HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PENMOUNT,
USB_DEVICE_ID_PENMOUNT_PCI) },

--
1.7.4.2


Attachments:
0001-HID-hid-multitouch-refactor-last_field_index.patch (6.12 kB)

2011-04-20 10:06:27

by Henrik Rydberg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: add support for PenMount dual-touch panel

> > Benjamin: Since field->index == 0 is in use, it seems the driver could
> > execute event emission wrongly under some circumstances (when
> > last_field_index == 0). Is that related to the reason for the quirk in
> > this patch?
>
> In fact, I have a second patch just on top of this one. It has been
> tested by Ryan with PenMount devices.

Great, and good timing. :-)

> I was waiting for Penmount to be included first as it does not impact
> any other drivers.

I would prefer the opposite order, since it is cleaner and means one
less device to test for the major change.

>
> I inline the code here, but my gmail client will destroy tabs (so I
> attached it too)....
>
> Can you test it against 3M?

I will test it against 3M and egalax. Thanks!

Henrik

2011-04-21 06:58:54

by Jiri Kosina

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: add support for PenMount dual-touch panel

On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, PenMount salt wrote:

> We are sorry, this is the first time we summit patches, and don't know
> the rules well yet. Is there a proper way we can correct this?

Please just resubmit the patch with modified From: and Signed-off-by:
lines so that they use real names.

See Documentation/SubmittingPatches, namely chapter 12 for details.

Thanks a lot for your work on supporting the new deivce.

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

2011-04-21 09:17:08

by Jiri Kosina

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: add support for PenMount dual-touch panel

On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Henrik Rydberg wrote:

> > In fact, I have a second patch just on top of this one. It has been
> > tested by Ryan with PenMount devices.
>
> Great, and good timing. :-)
>
> > I was waiting for Penmount to be included first as it does not impact
> > any other drivers.
>
> I would prefer the opposite order, since it is cleaner and means one
> less device to test for the major change.

I agree with Henrik on this.

Once you are done with testing the last_field_index change, it'd be great
if you could respin the patches so that the first one perfoms this change,
and the second one adds PenMount support on top of it.

I'll then apply it. Thanks,

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

2011-04-21 10:53:06

by Benjamin Tissoires

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: add support for PenMount dual-touch panel

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:17, Jiri Kosina <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>
>> > In fact, I have a second patch just on top of this one. It has been
>> > tested by Ryan with PenMount devices.
>>
>> Great, and good timing. :-)
>>
>> > I was waiting for Penmount to be included first as it does not impact
>> > any other drivers.
>>
>> I would prefer the opposite order, since it is cleaner and means one
>> less device to test for the major change.
>
> I agree with Henrik on this.
>
> Once you are done with testing the last_field_index change, it'd be great
> if you could respin the patches so that the first one perfoms this change,
> and the second one adds PenMount support on top of it.
>
> I'll then apply it. Thanks,

Hi Jiri,

I'll do that as soon as Henrik tells me it is working.

Cheers,
Benjamin

>
> --
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
>

2011-04-21 11:56:54

by Henrik Rydberg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: add support for PenMount dual-touch panel

> > Once you are done with testing the last_field_index change, it'd be great
> > if you could respin the patches so that the first one perfoms this change,
> > and the second one adds PenMount support on top of it.
> >
> > I'll then apply it. Thanks,
>
> Hi Jiri,
>
> I'll do that as soon as Henrik tells me it is working.

The 3M (0596:0502) and eGalax (0eef:720c) seem to work as expected.

Cheers,
Henrik

2011-04-21 12:05:59

by Benjamin Tissoires

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: add support for PenMount dual-touch panel

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 13:58, Henrik Rydberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Once you are done with testing the last_field_index change, it'd be great
>> > if you could respin the patches so that the first one perfoms this change,
>> > and the second one adds PenMount support on top of it.
>> >
>> > I'll then apply it. Thanks,
>>
>> Hi Jiri,
>>
>> I'll do that as soon as Henrik tells me it is working.
>
> The 3M (0596:0502) and eGalax (0eef:720c) seem to work as expected.
>

Thanks a lot Henrik.

I'll respin the patches right now!

Cheers,
Benjamin