seems this is just info, but probably should post this so you guys are
aware..:
[ 1308.117068]
[ 1308.117072] ===================================================
[ 1308.117080] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
[ 1308.117085] ---------------------------------------------------
[ 1308.117091] kernel/sched_rt.c:1266 invoked rcu_dereference_check()
without protection!
[ 1308.117096]
[ 1308.117097] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1308.117099]
[ 1308.117104]
[ 1308.117106] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
[ 1308.117112] 1 lock held by watchdog/1/16:
[ 1308.117116] #0: (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8103dac0>]
post_schedule.part.25+0x14/0x4a
[ 1308.117137]
[ 1308.117139] stack backtrace:
[ 1308.117146] Pid: 16, comm: watchdog/1 Not tainted
2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2
[ 1308.117151] Call Trace:
[ 1308.117163] [<ffffffff81079f6f>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9a/0xa2
[ 1308.117172] [<ffffffff8103d256>] find_lowest_rq+0xfe/0x179
[ 1308.117182] [<ffffffff81043f64>] push_rt_task.part.60+0x7b/0x1c8
[ 1308.117190] [<ffffffff810441bc>] post_schedule_rt+0x20/0x28
[ 1308.117198] [<ffffffff8103dadc>] post_schedule.part.25+0x30/0x4a
[ 1308.117209] [<ffffffff8148cce5>] schedule+0x725/0x773
[ 1308.117217] [<ffffffff810a3864>] ? watchdog_enable+0x198/0x198
[ 1308.117226] [<ffffffff8106e4b8>] ? cpu_clock+0x47/0x51
[ 1308.117234] [<ffffffff810a3864>] ? watchdog_enable+0x198/0x198
[ 1308.117241] [<ffffffff810a38d1>] watchdog+0x6d/0xb0
[ 1308.117249] [<ffffffff8106877d>] kthread+0xa8/0xb0
[ 1308.117259] [<ffffffff81496e64>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 1308.117268] [<ffffffff8148f594>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
[ 1308.117276] [<ffffffff810686d5>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5a/0x5a
[ 1308.117283] [<ffffffff81496e60>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
[ 1308.117675]
[ 1308.117678] ===================================================
[ 1308.117685] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
[ 1308.117690] ---------------------------------------------------
[ 1308.117695] kernel/sched.c:619 invoked rcu_dereference_check()
without protection!
[ 1308.117700]
[ 1308.117701] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1308.117704]
[ 1308.117708]
[ 1308.117710] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
[ 1308.117715] 2 locks held by rcuc0/7:
[ 1308.117719] #0: (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8148c6a1>]
schedule+0xe1/0x773
[ 1308.117736] #1: (&rq->lock/1){..-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8103f13e>]
double_lock_balance+0x6c/0x78
[ 1308.117753]
[ 1308.117755] stack backtrace:
[ 1308.117761] Pid: 7, comm: rcuc0 Not tainted
2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2
[ 1308.117766] Call Trace:
[ 1308.117776] [<ffffffff81079f6f>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9a/0xa2
[ 1308.117784] [<ffffffff8103ca8e>] task_group+0x7f/0xbe
[ 1308.117792] [<ffffffff8103cae4>] set_task_rq+0x17/0x70
[ 1308.117800] [<ffffffff81043c8d>] set_task_cpu+0xf7/0x14c
[ 1308.117810] [<ffffffff81217099>] ? plist_check_head+0x9a/0x9e
[ 1308.117818] [<ffffffff812171cf>] ? plist_del+0x70/0x79
[ 1308.117825] [<ffffffff8103e8b4>] ? dequeue_task_rt+0x38/0x3d
[ 1308.117833] [<ffffffff8103eb5c>] ? dequeue_task+0x87/0x8e
[ 1308.117841] [<ffffffff81043df7>] pull_rt_task+0x115/0x169
[ 1308.117849] [<ffffffff81043ee7>] pre_schedule_rt+0x1e/0x20
[ 1308.117857] [<ffffffff8148c889>] schedule+0x2c9/0x773
[ 1308.117865] [<ffffffff81068e22>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x6c/0x78
[ 1308.117875] [<ffffffff810a998a>] rcu_cpu_kthread+0xeb/0x34d
[ 1308.117883] [<ffffffff81068ef8>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x4b/0x4b
[ 1308.117892] [<ffffffff810a989f>] ? rcu_needs_cpu+0x1bd/0x1bd
[ 1308.117899] [<ffffffff8106877d>] kthread+0xa8/0xb0
[ 1308.117908] [<ffffffff81496e64>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 1308.117916] [<ffffffff8148f594>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
[ 1308.117924] [<ffffffff810686d5>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5a/0x5a
[ 1308.117933] [<ffffffff81496e60>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
full dmesg is here:
http://fpaste.org/IqRy/
Justin P. Mattock
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Justin P. Mattock
<[email protected]> wrote:
> seems this is just info, but probably should post this so you guys are
> aware..:
>
>
>
> [ 1308.117068]
> [ 1308.117072] ===================================================
> [ 1308.117080] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> [ 1308.117085] ---------------------------------------------------
> [ 1308.117091] kernel/sched_rt.c:1266 invoked rcu_dereference_check()
> without protection!
> [ 1308.117096]
> [ 1308.117097] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 1308.117099]
> [ 1308.117104]
> [ 1308.117106] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> [ 1308.117112] 1 lock held by watchdog/1/16:
> [ 1308.117116] ?#0: ?(&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8103dac0>]
> post_schedule.part.25+0x14/0x4a
> [ 1308.117137]
> [ 1308.117139] stack backtrace:
> [ 1308.117146] Pid: 16, comm: watchdog/1 Not tainted
> 2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2
> [ 1308.117151] Call Trace:
> [ 1308.117163] ?[<ffffffff81079f6f>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9a/0xa2
> [ 1308.117172] ?[<ffffffff8103d256>] find_lowest_rq+0xfe/0x179
> [ 1308.117182] ?[<ffffffff81043f64>] push_rt_task.part.60+0x7b/0x1c8
> [ 1308.117190] ?[<ffffffff810441bc>] post_schedule_rt+0x20/0x28
> [ 1308.117198] ?[<ffffffff8103dadc>] post_schedule.part.25+0x30/0x4a
> [ 1308.117209] ?[<ffffffff8148cce5>] schedule+0x725/0x773
> [ 1308.117217] ?[<ffffffff810a3864>] ? watchdog_enable+0x198/0x198
> [ 1308.117226] ?[<ffffffff8106e4b8>] ? cpu_clock+0x47/0x51
> [ 1308.117234] ?[<ffffffff810a3864>] ? watchdog_enable+0x198/0x198
> [ 1308.117241] ?[<ffffffff810a38d1>] watchdog+0x6d/0xb0
> [ 1308.117249] ?[<ffffffff8106877d>] kthread+0xa8/0xb0
> [ 1308.117259] ?[<ffffffff81496e64>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [ 1308.117268] ?[<ffffffff8148f594>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
> [ 1308.117276] ?[<ffffffff810686d5>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5a/0x5a
> [ 1308.117283] ?[<ffffffff81496e60>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
> [ 1308.117675]
> [ 1308.117678] ===================================================
> [ 1308.117685] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> [ 1308.117690] ---------------------------------------------------
> [ 1308.117695] kernel/sched.c:619 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without
> protection!
> [ 1308.117700]
> [ 1308.117701] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 1308.117704]
> [ 1308.117708]
> [ 1308.117710] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> [ 1308.117715] 2 locks held by rcuc0/7:
> [ 1308.117719] ?#0: ?(&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8148c6a1>]
> schedule+0xe1/0x773
> [ 1308.117736] ?#1: ?(&rq->lock/1){..-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8103f13e>]
> double_lock_balance+0x6c/0x78
> [ 1308.117753]
> [ 1308.117755] stack backtrace:
> [ 1308.117761] Pid: 7, comm: rcuc0 Not tainted 2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty
> #2
> [ 1308.117766] Call Trace:
> [ 1308.117776] ?[<ffffffff81079f6f>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9a/0xa2
> [ 1308.117784] ?[<ffffffff8103ca8e>] task_group+0x7f/0xbe
> [ 1308.117792] ?[<ffffffff8103cae4>] set_task_rq+0x17/0x70
> [ 1308.117800] ?[<ffffffff81043c8d>] set_task_cpu+0xf7/0x14c
> [ 1308.117810] ?[<ffffffff81217099>] ? plist_check_head+0x9a/0x9e
> [ 1308.117818] ?[<ffffffff812171cf>] ? plist_del+0x70/0x79
> [ 1308.117825] ?[<ffffffff8103e8b4>] ? dequeue_task_rt+0x38/0x3d
> [ 1308.117833] ?[<ffffffff8103eb5c>] ? dequeue_task+0x87/0x8e
> [ 1308.117841] ?[<ffffffff81043df7>] pull_rt_task+0x115/0x169
> [ 1308.117849] ?[<ffffffff81043ee7>] pre_schedule_rt+0x1e/0x20
> [ 1308.117857] ?[<ffffffff8148c889>] schedule+0x2c9/0x773
> [ 1308.117865] ?[<ffffffff81068e22>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x6c/0x78
> [ 1308.117875] ?[<ffffffff810a998a>] rcu_cpu_kthread+0xeb/0x34d
> [ 1308.117883] ?[<ffffffff81068ef8>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x4b/0x4b
> [ 1308.117892] ?[<ffffffff810a989f>] ? rcu_needs_cpu+0x1bd/0x1bd
> [ 1308.117899] ?[<ffffffff8106877d>] kthread+0xa8/0xb0
> [ 1308.117908] ?[<ffffffff81496e64>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> [ 1308.117916] ?[<ffffffff8148f594>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
> [ 1308.117924] ?[<ffffffff810686d5>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5a/0x5a
> [ 1308.117933] ?[<ffffffff81496e60>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
>
>
> full dmesg is here:
> http://fpaste.org/IqRy/
>
> Justin P. Mattock
>
well, after posting the above, I noticed some others as well.
(system got sluggish, but is responsive).
[ 2862.310349] WARNING: at net/ipv4/route.c:1668 ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62()
[ 2862.310353] Hardware name: MacBookPro2,2
[ 2862.310355] Modules linked in: fuse 8021q garp stp cpufreq_ondemand
llc acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4
nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables arc4
ath9k mac80211 radeon ath9k_common ath9k_hw ath cfg80211 btusb
bluetooth ttm drm_kms_helper drm uvcvideo joydev microcode appletouch
applesmc input_polldev iTCO_wdt videodev iTCO_vendor_support
v4l2_compat_ioctl32 i2c_i801 rfkill sky2 i2c_algo_bit i2c_core
apple_bl video [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[ 2862.310414] Pid: 6153, comm: gcm-session Not tainted
2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2
[ 2862.310417] Call Trace:
[ 2862.310424] [<ffffffff8104c634>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b
[ 2862.310430] [<ffffffff8104c666>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
[ 2862.310434] [<ffffffff814095c9>] ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62
[ 2862.310439] [<ffffffff814112a1>] dst_output+0x19/0x1d
[ 2862.310443] [<ffffffff81412aa0>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x25
[ 2862.310448] [<ffffffff814139c9>] ip_send_skb+0x19/0x58
[ 2862.310453] [<ffffffff8142fa4e>] udp_send_skb+0x239/0x29b
[ 2862.310458] [<ffffffff814310f0>] udp_sendmsg+0x5a1/0x7d4
[ 2862.310464] [<ffffffff81079408>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
[ 2862.310469] [<ffffffff8141139c>] ? ip_select_ident+0x3d/0x3d
[ 2862.310475] [<ffffffff810525b8>] ? local_bh_enable_ip+0xe/0x10
[ 2862.310481] [<ffffffff8148f131>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x31/0x35
[ 2862.310486] [<ffffffff813d41a6>] ? release_sock+0x14c/0x155
[ 2862.310490] [<ffffffff814386ac>] inet_sendmsg+0x66/0x6f
[ 2862.310495] [<ffffffff813d02b0>] sock_sendmsg+0xe6/0x109
[ 2862.310501] [<ffffffff8107d63f>] ? lock_acquire+0xe1/0x109
[ 2862.310505] [<ffffffff8107d535>] ? lock_release+0x1aa/0x1d3
[ 2862.310512] [<ffffffff810ed549>] ? might_fault+0xa5/0xac
[ 2862.310516] [<ffffffff813ceb34>] ? copy_from_user+0x2f/0x31
[ 2862.310521] [<ffffffff813d1f34>] sys_sendto+0x132/0x174
[ 2862.310526] [<ffffffff81495cfa>] ? sysret_check+0x2e/0x69
[ 2862.310531] [<ffffffff8107b016>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13f/0x172
[ 2862.310537] [<ffffffff8109fd4d>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x11c/0x148
[ 2862.310542] [<ffffffff8121debe>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 2862.310546] [<ffffffff81495cc2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 2862.310549] ---[ end trace 2d2332adaa8bf2b5 ]---
[ 2863.373889] ip_rt_bug: 10.0.0.10 -> 255.255.255.255, ?
[ 2863.373903] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 2863.373910] WARNING: at net/ipv4/route.c:1668 ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62()
[ 2863.373919] Hardware name: MacBookPro2,2
[ 2863.373921] Modules linked in: fuse 8021q garp stp cpufreq_ondemand
llc acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4
nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables arc4
ath9k mac80211 radeon ath9k_common ath9k_hw ath cfg80211 btusb
bluetooth ttm drm_kms_helper drm uvcvideo joydev microcode appletouch
applesmc input_polldev iTCO_wdt videodev iTCO_vendor_support
v4l2_compat_ioctl32 i2c_i801 rfkill sky2 i2c_algo_bit i2c_core
apple_bl video [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[ 2863.373986] Pid: 6153, comm: gcm-session Tainted: G W
2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2
[ 2863.373989] Call Trace:
[ 2863.373996] [<ffffffff8104c634>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b
[ 2863.374058] [<ffffffff8104c666>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
[ 2863.374063] [<ffffffff814095c9>] ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62
[ 2863.374068] [<ffffffff814112a1>] dst_output+0x19/0x1d
[ 2863.374073] [<ffffffff81412aa0>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x25
[ 2863.374079] [<ffffffff814139c9>] ip_send_skb+0x19/0x58
[ 2863.374084] [<ffffffff8142fa4e>] udp_send_skb+0x239/0x29b
[ 2863.374089] [<ffffffff814310f0>] udp_sendmsg+0x5a1/0x7d4
[ 2863.374095] [<ffffffff81079408>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
[ 2863.374100] [<ffffffff8141139c>] ? ip_select_ident+0x3d/0x3d
[ 2863.374106] [<ffffffff810525b8>] ? local_bh_enable_ip+0xe/0x10
[ 2863.374111] [<ffffffff8148f131>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x31/0x35
[ 2863.374117] [<ffffffff813d41a6>] ? release_sock+0x14c/0x155
[ 2863.374122] [<ffffffff814386ac>] inet_sendmsg+0x66/0x6f
[ 2863.374127] [<ffffffff813d02b0>] sock_sendmsg+0xe6/0x109
[ 2863.374132] [<ffffffff8107d63f>] ? lock_acquire+0xe1/0x109
[ 2863.374137] [<ffffffff8107d535>] ? lock_release+0x1aa/0x1d3
[ 2863.374143] [<ffffffff810ed549>] ? might_fault+0xa5/0xac
[ 2863.374148] [<ffffffff813ceb34>] ? copy_from_user+0x2f/0x31
[ 2863.374153] [<ffffffff813d1f34>] sys_sendto+0x132/0x174
[ 2863.374158] [<ffffffff81495cfa>] ? sysret_check+0x2e/0x69
[ 2863.374163] [<ffffffff8107b016>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13f/0x172
[ 2863.374169] [<ffffffff8109fd4d>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x11c/0x148
[ 2863.374175] [<ffffffff8121debe>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 2863.374180] [<ffffffff81495cc2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 2863.374184] ---[ end trace 2d2332adaa8bf2b6 ]---
full dmesg here:
http://fpaste.org/W4UK/
--
Justin P. Mattock
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:50:46PM -0700, Justin Mattock wrote:
> [ 2862.310349] WARNING: at net/ipv4/route.c:1668 ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62()
Awesome, adding that WARN_ON paid off. This is the same bug I've been trying
to reproduce the last few weeks. DaveM mentioned that it means we used
an input route for packet output.
> [ 2862.310414] Pid: 6153, comm: gcm-session Not tainted
> 2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2
> [ 2862.310417] Call Trace:
> [ 2862.310424] [<ffffffff8104c634>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b
> [ 2862.310430] [<ffffffff8104c666>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
> [ 2862.310434] [<ffffffff814095c9>] ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62
> [ 2862.310439] [<ffffffff814112a1>] dst_output+0x19/0x1d
> [ 2862.310443] [<ffffffff81412aa0>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x25
> [ 2862.310448] [<ffffffff814139c9>] ip_send_skb+0x19/0x58
> [ 2862.310453] [<ffffffff8142fa4e>] udp_send_skb+0x239/0x29b
> [ 2862.310458] [<ffffffff814310f0>] udp_sendmsg+0x5a1/0x7d4
> [ 2862.310464] [<ffffffff81079408>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
> [ 2862.310469] [<ffffffff8141139c>] ? ip_select_ident+0x3d/0x3d
> [ 2862.310475] [<ffffffff810525b8>] ? local_bh_enable_ip+0xe/0x10
> [ 2862.310481] [<ffffffff8148f131>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x31/0x35
> [ 2862.310486] [<ffffffff813d41a6>] ? release_sock+0x14c/0x155
> [ 2862.310490] [<ffffffff814386ac>] inet_sendmsg+0x66/0x6f
> [ 2862.310495] [<ffffffff813d02b0>] sock_sendmsg+0xe6/0x109
> [ 2862.310501] [<ffffffff8107d63f>] ? lock_acquire+0xe1/0x109
> [ 2862.310505] [<ffffffff8107d535>] ? lock_release+0x1aa/0x1d3
> [ 2862.310512] [<ffffffff810ed549>] ? might_fault+0xa5/0xac
> [ 2862.310516] [<ffffffff813ceb34>] ? copy_from_user+0x2f/0x31
> [ 2862.310521] [<ffffffff813d1f34>] sys_sendto+0x132/0x174
> [ 2862.310526] [<ffffffff81495cfa>] ? sysret_check+0x2e/0x69
> [ 2862.310531] [<ffffffff8107b016>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13f/0x172
> [ 2862.310537] [<ffffffff8109fd4d>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x11c/0x148
> [ 2862.310542] [<ffffffff8121debe>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
> [ 2862.310546] [<ffffffff81495cc2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 2862.310549] ---[ end trace 2d2332adaa8bf2b5 ]---
> [ 2863.373889] ip_rt_bug: 10.0.0.10 -> 255.255.255.255, ?
The common thing between your bug and the trace I triggered was the
destination ip reported. A clue maybe ?
Dave
On 05/24/2011 08:56 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:50:46PM -0700, Justin Mattock wrote:
>
> > [ 2862.310349] WARNING: at net/ipv4/route.c:1668 ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62()
>
> Awesome, adding that WARN_ON paid off. This is the same bug I've been trying
> to reproduce the last few weeks. DaveM mentioned that it means we used
> an input route for packet output.
>
> > [ 2862.310414] Pid: 6153, comm: gcm-session Not tainted
> > 2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2
> > [ 2862.310417] Call Trace:
> > [ 2862.310424] [<ffffffff8104c634>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b
> > [ 2862.310430] [<ffffffff8104c666>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
> > [ 2862.310434] [<ffffffff814095c9>] ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62
> > [ 2862.310439] [<ffffffff814112a1>] dst_output+0x19/0x1d
> > [ 2862.310443] [<ffffffff81412aa0>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x25
> > [ 2862.310448] [<ffffffff814139c9>] ip_send_skb+0x19/0x58
> > [ 2862.310453] [<ffffffff8142fa4e>] udp_send_skb+0x239/0x29b
> > [ 2862.310458] [<ffffffff814310f0>] udp_sendmsg+0x5a1/0x7d4
> > [ 2862.310464] [<ffffffff81079408>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
> > [ 2862.310469] [<ffffffff8141139c>] ? ip_select_ident+0x3d/0x3d
> > [ 2862.310475] [<ffffffff810525b8>] ? local_bh_enable_ip+0xe/0x10
> > [ 2862.310481] [<ffffffff8148f131>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x31/0x35
> > [ 2862.310486] [<ffffffff813d41a6>] ? release_sock+0x14c/0x155
> > [ 2862.310490] [<ffffffff814386ac>] inet_sendmsg+0x66/0x6f
> > [ 2862.310495] [<ffffffff813d02b0>] sock_sendmsg+0xe6/0x109
> > [ 2862.310501] [<ffffffff8107d63f>] ? lock_acquire+0xe1/0x109
> > [ 2862.310505] [<ffffffff8107d535>] ? lock_release+0x1aa/0x1d3
> > [ 2862.310512] [<ffffffff810ed549>] ? might_fault+0xa5/0xac
> > [ 2862.310516] [<ffffffff813ceb34>] ? copy_from_user+0x2f/0x31
> > [ 2862.310521] [<ffffffff813d1f34>] sys_sendto+0x132/0x174
> > [ 2862.310526] [<ffffffff81495cfa>] ? sysret_check+0x2e/0x69
> > [ 2862.310531] [<ffffffff8107b016>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13f/0x172
> > [ 2862.310537] [<ffffffff8109fd4d>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x11c/0x148
> > [ 2862.310542] [<ffffffff8121debe>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
> > [ 2862.310546] [<ffffffff81495cc2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> > [ 2862.310549] ---[ end trace 2d2332adaa8bf2b5 ]---
> > [ 2863.373889] ip_rt_bug: 10.0.0.10 -> 255.255.255.255, ?
>
> The common thing between your bug and the trace I triggered was the
> destination ip reported. A clue maybe ?
>
> Dave
>
>
there was a bug for http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129913127722786&w=2
but looking I see something in there with recv.c not route.c but
probably something
same or in the same vacinity. as for the sluggishness I have been
noticing the system doing so, but
never saw anything like the above, so if it is your WARN_ON then kudos
to you!
Justin P. Mattock
this fired off again.. fpasted dmesg.
http://fpaste.org/9bs4/
just pulled the laste Mainline will run and see, will send anything
forward if I see anything.
Note: I am off the lists at the moment due to a transistion, Cc's me
if anything.
--
Justin P. Mattock