2022-05-14 04:08:27

by Song Liu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] bpf: simplify if-if to if in bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach



> On May 12, 2022, at 7:17 AM, Wan Jiabing <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Simplify double 'if' statements to one 'if' statement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <[email protected]>
> ---
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 3a8b69ef9a0d..1b0db8f78dc8 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -2464,11 +2464,9 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
> if (!addrs)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - if (uaddrs) {
> - if (copy_from_user(addrs, uaddrs, size)) {
> - err = -EFAULT;
> - goto error_addrs;
> - }
> + if (uaddrs && copy_from_user(addrs, uaddrs, size)) {
> + err = -EFAULT;
> + goto error_addrs;
> } else {
> struct user_syms us;

This changed the behavior, no?

For uaddrs != NULL and copy_from_user() == 0 case, we now going into
else clause. Did I misread anything?

Song