2015-08-06 09:11:32

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ARM/EP93xx/timer: Migrate to new 'set-state' interface

Migrate EP93xx driver to the new 'set-state' interface provided by
clockevents core, the earlier 'set-mode' interface is marked obsolete
now.

This also enables us to implement callbacks for new states of clockevent
devices, for example: ONESHOT_STOPPED.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
---
Linus,

All other clockevent drivers are migrated to the new interface and yours
was left as it adapted generic clockevents framework just now.

Probably Olof can apply it directly to ARM SoC tree..

arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c
index ac48ac1fd16d..e5f791145bd0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/timer-ep93xx.c
@@ -86,19 +86,22 @@ static int ep93xx_clkevt_set_next_event(unsigned long next,
}


-static void ep93xx_clkevt_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode,
- struct clock_event_device *evt)
+static int ep93xx_clkevt_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *evt)
{
/* Disable timer */
writel(0, EP93XX_TIMER3_CONTROL);
+
+ return 0;
}

static struct clock_event_device ep93xx_clockevent = {
- .name = "timer1",
- .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT,
- .set_mode = ep93xx_clkevt_set_mode,
- .set_next_event = ep93xx_clkevt_set_next_event,
- .rating = 300,
+ .name = "timer1",
+ .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT,
+ .set_state_shutdown = ep93xx_clkevt_shutdown,
+ .set_state_oneshot = ep93xx_clkevt_shutdown,
+ .tick_resume = ep93xx_clkevt_shutdown,
+ .set_next_event = ep93xx_clkevt_set_next_event,
+ .rating = 300,
};

static irqreturn_t ep93xx_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
--
2.4.0


2015-08-10 09:01:50

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM/EP93xx/timer: Migrate to new 'set-state' interface

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:

> Migrate EP93xx driver to the new 'set-state' interface provided by
> clockevents core, the earlier 'set-mode' interface is marked obsolete
> now.
>
> This also enables us to implement callbacks for new states of clockevent
> devices, for example: ONESHOT_STOPPED.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
> ---
> Linus,
>
> All other clockevent drivers are migrated to the new interface and yours
> was left as it adapted generic clockevents framework just now.
>
> Probably Olof can apply it directly to ARM SoC tree..

Sure, but does it work right off or does Olof have to
pull a branch from your tree in for it to work? In that
case I suggest you take this in the -rc phase. Anyways:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

2015-08-10 09:03:39

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM/EP93xx/timer: Migrate to new 'set-state' interface

On 10-08-15, 11:01, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Sure, but does it work right off or does Olof have to
> pull a branch from your tree in for it to work? In that
> case I suggest you take this in the -rc phase. Anyways:
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>

It should work with latest 4.2 rc..

--
viresh

2015-08-11 13:47:10

by Olof Johansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM/EP93xx/timer: Migrate to new 'set-state' interface

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:33:34PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10-08-15, 11:01, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > Sure, but does it work right off or does Olof have to
> > pull a branch from your tree in for it to work? In that
> > case I suggest you take this in the -rc phase. Anyways:
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
>
> It should work with latest 4.2 rc..

Latest? We don't base our tree on the latest -- instead we try to keep
back on -rc2/3 if we can. Right now our tree is on -rc2.


Please confirm that this is still OK to merge with that as base. Thanks.


-Olof

2015-08-11 14:07:52

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM/EP93xx/timer: Migrate to new 'set-state' interface

On 11-08-15, 15:19, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Latest? We don't base our tree on the latest -- instead we try to keep
> back on -rc2/3 if we can. Right now our tree is on -rc2.
>
>
> Please confirm that this is still OK to merge with that as base. Thanks.

Yeah, rc2 should be fine.

--
viresh

2015-08-12 16:39:52

by Hartley Sweeten

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ARM/EP93xx/timer: Migrate to new 'set-state' interface

On Thursday, August 06, 2015 2:11 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Migrate EP93xx driver to the new 'set-state' interface provided by
> clockevents core, the earlier 'set-mode' interface is marked obsolete
> now.
>
> This also enables us to implement callbacks for new states of clockevent
> devices, for example: ONESHOT_STOPPED.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: H Hartley Sweeten <[email protected]>

2015-08-13 09:31:23

by Olof Johansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM/EP93xx/timer: Migrate to new 'set-state' interface

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 04:39:46PM +0000, Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Thursday, August 06, 2015 2:11 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Migrate EP93xx driver to the new 'set-state' interface provided by
> > clockevents core, the earlier 'set-mode' interface is marked obsolete
> > now.
> >
> > This also enables us to implement callbacks for new states of clockevent
> > devices, for example: ONESHOT_STOPPED.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: H Hartley Sweeten <[email protected]>

Thanks, applied now.


-Olof