If Auto-Hibern8 capability is supported by host but not actually
enabled, Auto-Hibern8 error shall not happen. Thus bypass
Auto-Hibern8 disabling case in ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_error().
Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <[email protected]>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index abd0e6b05f79..214a3f373dd8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -5479,7 +5479,8 @@ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_update_uic_error(struct ufs_hba *hba)
static bool ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_error(struct ufs_hba *hba,
u32 intr_mask)
{
- if (!ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(hba))
+ if (!ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_supported(hba) ||
+ !ufshcd_is_auto_hibern8_enabled(hba))
return false;
if (!(intr_mask & UFSHCD_UIC_HIBERN8_MASK))
--
2.18.0
Hi, Stanley
Do you think it is necessary to add fixes tag, and combine this patch with previous patch to
single patch? That will be easier to down port to the older kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <[email protected]>
Hi Bean,
On Tue, 2020-01-28 at 15:52 +0000, Bean Huo (beanhuo) wrote:
> Hi, Stanley
> Do you think it is necessary to add fixes tag, and combine this patch with previous patch to
> single patch? That will be easier to down port to the older kernel.
OK! I will update this patch according to your suggestions in next
version.
Thanks,
Stanley