2018-08-14 22:12:55

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arc-current tree with Linus' tree

Hi Vineet,

Today's linux-next merge of the arc-current tree got a conflict in:

arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h

between commit:

ab0b910490fe ("atomics/arc: Define atomic64_fetch_add_unless()")

from Linus' tree and commit:

39456148db74 ("ARC: atomic64: fix atomic64_add_unless function")

from the arc-current tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the version from Linus' tree for now) and
can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2018-08-14 23:01:35

by Vineet Gupta

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arc-current tree with Linus' tree

On 08/14/2018 03:11 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Vineet,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arc-current tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h
>
> between commit:
>
> ab0b910490fe ("atomics/arc: Define atomic64_fetch_add_unless()")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 39456148db74 ("ARC: atomic64: fix atomic64_add_unless function")
>
> from the arc-current tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just used the version from Linus' tree for now) and
> can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Thx for the report Stephen. I've dropped my patch for now, let the dust settle and
then we can add it.

Thx,
-Vineet