2009-11-02 03:56:26

by JosephChan

Subject: [patch 1/1 v3] pata_via.c : extend the rev_max for VIA VT6330

Re-send.

Fix the VIA VT6330 issue, it's because the rev_max of VT6330 exceeds 0x2f.
The VIA VT6415 and VT6330 share the same device ID.

Signed-off-by: Joseph Chan <[email protected]>

--- a/drivers/ata/pata_via.c 2009-10-15 23:12:49.000000000 +0800
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_via.c 2009-10-15 23:12:57.000000000 +0800
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
{ "vt8251", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8251, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
{ "cx700", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_SATA_PATA },
{ "vt6410", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6410, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_NO_ENABLES },
- { "vt6415", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6415, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_NO_ENABLES },
+ { "vt6415", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_6415, 0x00, 0xff, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_NO_ENABLES },
{ "vt8237a", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237A, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
{ "vt8237", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
{ "vt8235", PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8235, 0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m????????????I?

2009-11-02 03:58:26

by JosephChan

Subject: RE: [patch 1/1 v3] pata_via.c : extend the rev_max for VIA VT6330

Sorry, sent wrong patch...
Please ignore this patch..


BRs,
Joseph Chan
????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m????????????I?