2022-02-24 16:07:53

by Naresh Kamboju

Subject: [next] LTP: readahead02.c:295: TFAIL: readahead failed to save any I/O

On Linux next 20220222 tag LTP syscalls test case readahead02 failed.
Please find detail test output on below link [1]

test failed log:
--------------------
readahead02.c:181: TPASS: offset is still at 0 as expected
readahead02.c:285: TINFO: read_testfile(0) took: 37567 usec
readahead02.c:286: TINFO: read_testfile(1) took: 37263 usec
readahead02.c:288: TINFO: read_testfile(0) read: 0 bytes
readahead02.c:290: TINFO: read_testfile(1) read: 0 bytes
readahead02.c:295: TFAIL: readahead failed to save any I/O

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

[1] https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/4607403#L16941

2022-02-24 20:36:07

by Matthew Wilcox

Subject: Re: [next] LTP: readahead02.c:295: TFAIL: readahead failed to save any I/O

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 02:57:59PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Linux next 20220222 tag LTP syscalls test case readahead02 failed.
> Please find detail test output on below link [1]
>
> test failed log:
> --------------------
> readahead02.c:181: TPASS: offset is still at 0 as expected
> readahead02.c:285: TINFO: read_testfile(0) took: 37567 usec
> readahead02.c:286: TINFO: read_testfile(1) took: 37263 usec
> readahead02.c:288: TINFO: read_testfile(0) read: 0 bytes
> readahead02.c:290: TINFO: read_testfile(1) read: 0 bytes
> readahead02.c:295: TFAIL: readahead failed to save any I/O

Confirmed, I can reproduce this with the folio tree. Will work on
this once I've disposed of the other bug I'm looking at right now.