2022-02-09 20:16:02

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 0/3] 4.14.266-rc1 review

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.266 release.
There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.266-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 4.14.266-rc1

luofei <[email protected]>
x86/mm, mm/hwpoison: Fix the unmap kernel 1:1 pages check condition

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path

Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
cgroup-v1: Require capabilities to set release_agent


-------------

Diffstat:

Makefile | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 2 +-
drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +-
kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)




2022-02-09 20:44:54

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 2/3] moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit bd2db32e7c3e35bd4d9b8bbff689434a50893546 upstream.

It was reported that the mmc host structure could be accessed after it
was freed in moxart_remove(), so fix this by saving the base register of
the device and using it instead of the pointer dereference.

Cc: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
Cc: Xiyu Yang <[email protected]>
Cc: Xin Xiong <[email protected]>
Cc: Xin Tan <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
Cc: Yang Li <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: stable <[email protected]>
Reported-by: whitehat002 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c
@@ -696,12 +696,12 @@ static int moxart_remove(struct platform
if (!IS_ERR(host->dma_chan_rx))
dma_release_channel(host->dma_chan_rx);
mmc_remove_host(mmc);
- mmc_free_host(mmc);

writel(0, host->base + REG_INTERRUPT_MASK);
writel(0, host->base + REG_POWER_CONTROL);
writel(readl(host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL) | CLK_OFF,
host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL);
+ mmc_free_host(mmc);
}
return 0;
}



2022-02-11 00:57:18

by Slade's Kernel Patch Bot

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 0/3] 4.14.266-rc1 review

On Wed, Feb 9, 2022, at 2:13 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.266 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Compiled and booted 4.14.266-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions.

Tested-by: Slade Watkins <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Slade

2022-02-11 06:15:09

by Naresh Kamboju

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 0/3] 4.14.266-rc1 review

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 00:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.266 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.266-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>

## Build
* kernel: 4.14.266-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-4.14.y
* git commit: 11dfe0b418492a0075056a9db72fd2a34628c1cd
* git describe: v4.14.264-74-g11dfe0b41849
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.14.y/build/v4.14.264-74-g11dfe0b41849

## Test Regressions (compared to v4.14.264-70-g1d3edcc1650d)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.14.264-70-g1d3edcc1650d)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v4.14.264-70-g1d3edcc1650d)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.14.264-70-g1d3edcc1650d)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 52019, pass: 43671, fail: 273, skip: 7413, xfail: 662

## Build Summary
* arm: 126 total, 118 passed, 8 failed
* arm64: 32 total, 32 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 0 passed, 52 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

2022-02-11 15:15:21

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 0/3] 4.14.266-rc1 review

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:13:37PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.266 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

Build results:
total: 168 pass: 168 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 424 pass: 424 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

Guenter