[ Please ignore this email if it is already reported ]
The s390 gcc-8 builds failed on Linux next tag next-20240215..next-20240223.
First build failures noticed on tag next-20240215 for both gcc-13 and gcc-8.
But from the next tag next-20240216 gcc-13 passed but gcc-8 failed.
s390:
- defconfig-fe40093d - gcc-8 - Failed
- tinyconfig - gcc-8 - Failed
- allnoconfig - gcc-8 - Failed
- defconfig-fe40093d - gcc-13 - Pass from next-20240216
- tinyconfig - gcc-13 - Pass from next-20240216
- allnoconfig - gcc-13 - Pass from next-20240216
Build log:
---------
s390x-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/arch/s390/boot/Makefile:87:
arch/s390/boot/vmlinux.syms] Error 1
make[3]: Target 'arch/s390/boot/bzImage' not remade because of errors.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
Steps to reproduce:
$ tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch s390 --toolchain gcc-8
--kconfig tinyconfig
Links:
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20240223/testrun/22812529/suite/build/test/gcc-8-defconfig-fe40093d/details/
- https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2cl8pys1B3Vc4oOB2yXcaYkfnKw/
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 03:11:50PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> [ Please ignore this email if it is already reported ]
>
> The s390 gcc-8 builds failed on Linux next tag next-20240215..next-20240223.
> First build failures noticed on tag next-20240215 for both gcc-13 and gcc-8.
> But from the next tag next-20240216 gcc-13 passed but gcc-8 failed.
>
> s390:
> - defconfig-fe40093d - gcc-8 - Failed
> - tinyconfig - gcc-8 - Failed
> - allnoconfig - gcc-8 - Failed
..
> Build log:
> ---------
> s390x-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
> make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/arch/s390/boot/Makefile:87:
> arch/s390/boot/vmlinux.syms] Error 1
> make[3]: Target 'arch/s390/boot/bzImage' not remade because of errors.
..
> Steps to reproduce:
> $ tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch s390 --toolchain gcc-8
> --kconfig tinyconfig
>
> Links:
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20240223/testrun/22812529/suite/build/test/gcc-8-defconfig-fe40093d/details/
> - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2cl8pys1B3Vc4oOB2yXcaYkfnKw/
Thanks should hopefully be fixed with the patch below, which should be
part of the next linux-next release.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=features&id=a795e5d2347def129734a7f247ac70339d50d8c2
From a795e5d2347def129734a7f247ac70339d50d8c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 17:39:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] s390: vmlinux.lds.S: fix .got.plt assertion
Naresh reported this build error on linux-next:
s390x-linux-gnu-ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/arch/s390/boot/Makefile:87:
arch/s390/boot/vmlinux.syms] Error 1
make[3]: Target 'arch/s390/boot/bzImage' not remade because of errors.
The reason for the build error is an incorrect/incomplete assertion which
checks the size of the .got.plt section. Similar to x86 the size is either
zero or 24 bytes (three entries).
See commit 262b5cae67a6 ("x86/boot/compressed: Move .got.plt entries out of
the .got section") for more details. The three reserved/additional entries
for s390 are described in chapter 3.2.2 of the s390x ABI [1] (thanks to
Andreas Krebbel for pointing this out!).
[1] https://github.com/IBM/s390x-abi/releases/download/v1.6.1/lzsabi_s390x.pdf
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYvWp8TY-fMEvc3UhoVtoR_eM5VsfHj3+n+kexcfJJ+Cvw@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: 30226853d6ec ("s390: vmlinux.lds.S: explicitly handle '.got' and '.plt' sections")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
---
arch/s390/boot/vmlinux.lds.S | 11 ++++++++---
arch/s390/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 11 ++++++++---
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/boot/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/s390/boot/vmlinux.lds.S
index e3208893ba6b..3d7ea585ab99 100644
--- a/arch/s390/boot/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/s390/boot/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -144,13 +144,18 @@ SECTIONS
ELF_DETAILS
/*
- * Sections that should stay zero sized, which is safer to
- * explicitly check instead of blindly discarding.
+ * Make sure that the .got.plt is either completely empty or it
+ * contains only the three reserved double words.
*/
.got.plt : {
*(.got.plt)
}
- ASSERT(SIZEOF(.got.plt) == 0, "Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!")
+ ASSERT(SIZEOF(.got.plt) == 0 || SIZEOF(.got.plt) == 0x18, "Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!")
+
+ /*
+ * Sections that should stay zero sized, which is safer to
+ * explicitly check instead of blindly discarding.
+ */
.plt : {
*(.plt) *(.plt.*) *(.iplt) *(.igot .igot.plt)
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/s390/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index 404883b1b023..9c59715d1745 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -266,13 +266,18 @@ SECTIONS
ELF_DETAILS
/*
- * Sections that should stay zero sized, which is safer to
- * explicitly check instead of blindly discarding.
+ * Make sure that the .got.plt is either completely empty or it
+ * contains only the three reserved double words.
*/
.got.plt : {
*(.got.plt)
}
- ASSERT(SIZEOF(.got.plt) == 0, "Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!")
+ ASSERT(SIZEOF(.got.plt) == 0 || SIZEOF(.got.plt) == 0x18, "Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!")
+
+ /*
+ * Sections that should stay zero sized, which is safer to
+ * explicitly check instead of blindly discarding.
+ */
.plt : {
*(.plt) *(.plt.*) *(.iplt) *(.igot .igot.plt)
}
--
2.43.2