On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 7:13 AM Markus Elfring <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:54:18 +0100
>
> The label “err_out” was used to jump to another pointer check despite of
> the detail in the implementation of the function “rbtree_add_and_remove”
> that it was determined already that a corresponding variable contained
> a null pointer.
>
> 1. Thus return directly after the first call of the function
> “bpf_obj_new” failed.
>
> 2. Delete two questionable checks.
>
> 3. Omit an extra initialisation (for the variable “m”)
> which became unnecessary with this refactoring.
>
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Fixes: 215249f6adc0359e3546829e7ee622b5e309b0ad ("selftests/bpf: Add rbtree selftests")
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]>
Nack.
Please stop sending such "cleanup" patches.