Hi Shawn, Fabio,
Last October I offered the following two patches that add regulators
to fix USB PHY reset on 2 of our boards:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9395531/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9395539/
At the time you preferred to wait for Peter's pwrseq sub-system to get
in to have a proper reset sequence.
Since then, it seems that it's still going to take a long time before
Peter's series makes it to mainline and many customers of ours
complained about USB.
Would you consider adding back those two patches for next cycle. We
can still modify them to use pwrseq in the future.
Regards,
Gary
Hi Gary,
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Gary Bisson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Shawn, Fabio,
>
> Last October I offered the following two patches that add regulators
> to fix USB PHY reset on 2 of our boards:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9395531/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9395539/
>
> At the time you preferred to wait for Peter's pwrseq sub-system to get
> in to have a proper reset sequence.
>
> Since then, it seems that it's still going to take a long time before
> Peter's series makes it to mainline and many customers of ours
> complained about USB.
Yes, it seems that it may take some more time for Peter's pwrseq to be accepted.
> Would you consider adding back those two patches for next cycle. We
> can still modify them to use pwrseq in the future.
What if you resend the patches stating that it is a temporary
workaround until the generic pwrseq bindings are accepted?