Delete the redundant word 'next'.
Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
index 471fd6c8135f..4f9edca66632 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
@@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ int exynos_g2d_set_cmdlist_ioctl(struct drm_device *drm_dev, void *data,
* If don't clear SFR registers, the cmdlist is affected by register
* values of previous cmdlist. G2D hw executes SFR clear command and
* a next command at the same time then the next command is ignored and
- * is executed rightly from next next command, so needs a dummy command
+ * is executed rightly from next command, so needs a dummy command
* to next command of SFR clear command.
*/
cmdlist->data[cmdlist->last++] = G2D_SOFT_RESET;
--
2.36.1
On 2022-08-23 13:21, Jilin Yuan wrote:
> Delete the redundant word 'next'.
From the context, I'm not sure it is redundant - as far as I can tell
this comment seems to be describing a sequence of 3 commands, where
"current" is the first, "next" is the second, and "next next" implies
the third. The whole comment could certainly be reworded more clearly,
but as it stands I suspect a replacement like s/next next/next+1/ is
more likely to be correct.
Robin.
> Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
> index 471fd6c8135f..4f9edca66632 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
> @@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ int exynos_g2d_set_cmdlist_ioctl(struct drm_device *drm_dev, void *data,
> * If don't clear SFR registers, the cmdlist is affected by register
> * values of previous cmdlist. G2D hw executes SFR clear command and
> * a next command at the same time then the next command is ignored and
> - * is executed rightly from next next command, so needs a dummy command
> + * is executed rightly from next command, so needs a dummy command
> * to next command of SFR clear command.
> */
> cmdlist->data[cmdlist->last++] = G2D_SOFT_RESET;
Hi,
2022년 8월 23일 (화) 오후 10:37, Robin Murphy <[email protected]>님이 작성:
>
> On 2022-08-23 13:21, Jilin Yuan wrote:
> > Delete the redundant word 'next'.
>
> From the context, I'm not sure it is redundant - as far as I can tell
> this comment seems to be describing a sequence of 3 commands, where
> "current" is the first, "next" is the second, and "next next" implies
> the third. The whole comment could certainly be reworded more clearly,
> but as it stands I suspect a replacement like s/next next/next+1/ is
> more likely to be correct.
>
"next next" is correct. :) As you said, "next next" could be reworded
more clearly. As of now, the original sentence could make it
confusing.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
> Robin.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
> > index 471fd6c8135f..4f9edca66632 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
> > @@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ int exynos_g2d_set_cmdlist_ioctl(struct drm_device *drm_dev, void *data,
> > * If don't clear SFR registers, the cmdlist is affected by register
> > * values of previous cmdlist. G2D hw executes SFR clear command and
> > * a next command at the same time then the next command is ignored and
> > - * is executed rightly from next next command, so needs a dummy command
> > + * is executed rightly from next command, so needs a dummy command
> > * to next command of SFR clear command.
> > */
> > cmdlist->data[cmdlist->last++] = G2D_SOFT_RESET;