2022-09-30 14:43:01

by Jason A. Donenfeld

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] mips: allow firmware to pass RNG seed to kernel

Nearly all other firmware environments have some way of passing a RNG
seed to initialize the RNG: DTB's rng-seed, EFI's RNG protocol, m68k's
bootinfo block, x86's setup_data, and so forth. This adds something
similar for MIPS, which will allow various firmware environments,
bootloaders, and hypervisors to pass an RNG seed to initialize the
kernel's RNG.

Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]>
---
arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
index 2ca156a5b231..39c79f67c7a3 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#include <asm/setup.h>
#include <asm/smp-ops.h>
#include <asm/prom.h>
+#include <asm/fw/fw.h>

#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_ELF_APPENDED_DTB
char __section(".appended_dtb") __appended_dtb[0x100000];
@@ -756,6 +757,24 @@ static void __init prefill_possible_map(void)
static inline void prefill_possible_map(void) {}
#endif

+static void __init setup_rng_seed(void)
+{
+ char *rng_seed_hex = fw_getenv("rngseed");
+ u8 rng_seed[512];
+ size_t len;
+
+ if (!rng_seed_hex)
+ return;
+
+ len = min(sizeof(rng_seed), strlen(rng_seed_hex) / 2);
+ if (hex2bin(rng_seed, rng_seed_hex, len))
+ return;
+
+ add_bootloader_randomness(rng_seed, len);
+ memzero_explicit(rng_seed, len);
+ memzero_explicit(rng_seed_hex, len * 2);
+}
+
void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
{
cpu_probe();
@@ -786,6 +805,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
paging_init();

memblock_dump_all();
+
+ setup_rng_seed();
}

unsigned long kernelsp[NR_CPUS];
--
2.37.3


2022-10-01 16:53:15

by Thomas Bogendoerfer

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: allow firmware to pass RNG seed to kernel

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 04:01:38PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Nearly all other firmware environments have some way of passing a RNG
> seed to initialize the RNG: DTB's rng-seed, EFI's RNG protocol, m68k's
> bootinfo block, x86's setup_data, and so forth. This adds something
> similar for MIPS, which will allow various firmware environments,
> bootloaders, and hypervisors to pass an RNG seed to initialize the
> kernel's RNG.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]

2022-10-03 22:23:01

by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: allow firmware to pass RNG seed to kernel

Hi Jason,

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 4:05 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Nearly all other firmware environments have some way of passing a RNG
> seed to initialize the RNG: DTB's rng-seed, EFI's RNG protocol, m68k's
> bootinfo block, x86's setup_data, and so forth. This adds something
> similar for MIPS, which will allow various firmware environments,
> bootloaders, and hypervisors to pass an RNG seed to initialize the
> kernel's RNG.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> index 2ca156a5b231..39c79f67c7a3 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> #include <asm/setup.h>
> #include <asm/smp-ops.h>
> #include <asm/prom.h>
> +#include <asm/fw/fw.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_ELF_APPENDED_DTB
> char __section(".appended_dtb") __appended_dtb[0x100000];
> @@ -756,6 +757,24 @@ static void __init prefill_possible_map(void)
> static inline void prefill_possible_map(void) {}
> #endif
>
> +static void __init setup_rng_seed(void)
> +{
> + char *rng_seed_hex = fw_getenv("rngseed");
> + u8 rng_seed[512];
> + size_t len;
> +
> + if (!rng_seed_hex)
> + return;
> +

Assuming rngseed="x", ...

> + len = min(sizeof(rng_seed), strlen(rng_seed_hex) / 2);

... len = 0 ...

> + if (hex2bin(rng_seed, rng_seed_hex, len))
> + return;

hex2bin(..., len=0) = 0

> +
> + add_bootloader_randomness(rng_seed, len);

So we call char/random code with len=0. Is it safe?
Maybe simply safer to check len before calling hex2bin?

> + memzero_explicit(rng_seed, len);
> + memzero_explicit(rng_seed_hex, len * 2);
> +}
> +
> void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> {
> cpu_probe();
> @@ -786,6 +805,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> paging_init();
>
> memblock_dump_all();
> +
> + setup_rng_seed();
> }
>
> unsigned long kernelsp[NR_CPUS];
> --
> 2.37.3
>

2022-10-03 22:52:01

by Jason A. Donenfeld

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: allow firmware to pass RNG seed to kernel

Hi Philippe,

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 12:07 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> wrote:
> > + add_bootloader_randomness(rng_seed, len);
>
> So we call char/random code with len=0. Is it safe?
> Maybe simply safer to check len before calling hex2bin?

add_bootloader_randomness() is safe for all input sizes, and is
written to be callable with len=0 and have no effect. So this function
should be good as-is; there's no need to special case an unlikely
instance that's already handled by add_bootloader_randomness().

Jason

2022-10-06 11:46:00

by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: allow firmware to pass RNG seed to kernel

On 4/10/22 00:30, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 12:07 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> + add_bootloader_randomness(rng_seed, len);
>>
>> So we call char/random code with len=0. Is it safe?
>> Maybe simply safer to check len before calling hex2bin?
>
> add_bootloader_randomness() is safe for all input sizes, and is
> written to be callable with len=0 and have no effect. So this function
> should be good as-is; there's no need to special case an unlikely
> instance that's already handled by add_bootloader_randomness().

OK, thanks for the clarification.

Phil.