The correct sip/sie 0x222 could mask wrong 0x000 by VSIP_VALID_MASK,
This patch fix it.
Signed-off-by: Yifei Jiang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yipeng Yin <[email protected]>
---
arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
index adb0815951aa..2976666e921f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
@@ -419,8 +419,8 @@ static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_csr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (reg_num == KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(sip) ||
reg_num == KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(sie)) {
- reg_val = reg_val << VSIP_TO_HVIP_SHIFT;
reg_val = reg_val & VSIP_VALID_MASK;
+ reg_val = reg_val << VSIP_TO_HVIP_SHIFT;
}
((unsigned long *)csr)[reg_num] = reg_val;
--
2.19.1
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 1:53 PM Yifei Jiang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The correct sip/sie 0x222 could mask wrong 0x000 by VSIP_VALID_MASK,
> This patch fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yifei Jiang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Yipeng Yin <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> index adb0815951aa..2976666e921f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> @@ -419,8 +419,8 @@ static int kvm_riscv_vcpu_set_reg_csr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> if (reg_num == KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(sip) ||
> reg_num == KVM_REG_RISCV_CSR_REG(sie)) {
> - reg_val = reg_val << VSIP_TO_HVIP_SHIFT;
> reg_val = reg_val & VSIP_VALID_MASK;
> + reg_val = reg_val << VSIP_TO_HVIP_SHIFT;
Thanks for this fix. I have squashed it into PATCH5 of KVM RISC-V v14
series.
Regards,
Anup