It looks like this series got quite a few Reviewed-by now. What should
be the next steps to have it merged ?
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 5:09 PM Florent Revest <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Joey recently introduced a Memory-Deny-Write-Executable (MDWE) prctl which tags
> current with a flag that prevents pages that were previously not executable from
> becoming executable.
> This tag always gets inherited by children tasks. (it's in MMF_INIT_MASK)
>
> At Google, we've been using a somewhat similar downstream patch for a few years
> now. To make the adoption of this feature easier, we've had it support a mode in
> which the W^X flag does not propagate to children. For example, this is handy if
> a C process which wants W^X protection suspects it could start children
> processes that would use a JIT.
>
> I'd like to align our features with the upstream prctl. This series proposes a
> new NO_INHERIT flag to the MDWE prctl to make this kind of adoption easier. It
> sets a different flag in current that is not in MMF_INIT_MASK and which does not
> propagate.
>
> As part of looking into MDWE, I also fixed a couple of things in the MDWE test.
>
> This series applies on the mm-everything-2023-08-25-20-06 tag of the mm tree:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git/
>
> Diff since v3:
> - Added a bunch of Reviewed-by, Acked-by and Tested-by. Thanks everyone!
> - Reworded patch 2's description for clarity
> - Removed an unnecessary int cast
> - Added test coverage for errnos of invalid prctls (EPERM/EINVAL)
> - Added test coverage for can_keep_no_flags and can_keep_both_flags
>
> Diff since v2:
> - Turned the MMF_INIT_FLAGS macro into a mmf_init_flags function as suggested by
> David Hildenbrand
> - Removed the ability to transition from to PR_MDWE_REFUSE_EXEC_GAIN from
> (PR_MDWE_REFUSE_EXEC_GAIN | PR_MDWE_NO_INHERIT) which also significantly
> simplifies the prctl_set_mdwe logic
> - Cc-ed -stable on patch 3 as suggested by Alexey Izbyshev
> - Added a handful of Reviewed-by/Acked-by trailers
>
> Diff since v1:
> - MMF_HAS_MDWE_NO_INHERIT clears MMF_HAS_MDWE in the fork path as part of a
> MMF_INIT_FLAGS macro (suggested by Catalin)
> - PR_MDWE_* are defined as unsigned long rather than int (suggested by Andrey)
>
> Florent Revest (6):
> kselftest: vm: Fix tabs/spaces inconsistency in the mdwe test
> kselftest: vm: Fix mdwe's mmap_FIXED test case
> kselftest: vm: Check errnos in mdwe_test
> mm: Make PR_MDWE_REFUSE_EXEC_GAIN an unsigned long
> mm: Add a NO_INHERIT flag to the PR_SET_MDWE prctl
> kselftest: vm: Add tests for no-inherit memory-deny-write-execute
>
> include/linux/sched/coredump.h | 10 ++
> include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 3 +-
> kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sys.c | 32 ++++--
> tools/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 3 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/mdwe_test.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 6 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.42.0.rc2.253.gd59a3bf2b4-goog
>
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 09:56:08PM +0200, Florent Revest wrote:
> It looks like this series got quite a few Reviewed-by now. What should
> be the next steps to have it merged ?
Does it still apply on top of 6.6-rc2? Maybe Andrew can pick it up
through the mm tree?
--
Catalin
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 11:52 AM Catalin Marinas
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 09:56:08PM +0200, Florent Revest wrote:
> > It looks like this series got quite a few Reviewed-by now. What should
> > be the next steps to have it merged ?
>
> Does it still apply on top of 6.6-rc2? Maybe Andrew can pick it up
> through the mm tree?
Luckily, yes, it still applies! :)