Hi Andy (&list),
this is more of a heads up than a bug report, since it turns out you
already fixed this in
731e33e: x86/arch_prctl/64: Remove FSBASE/GSBASE < 4G optimization
In any case, without that commit, trying to use PTRACE_SETREGS to set
either fs_base, or gs_base to 0 when it was previously <4G, but wasn't
0, fails to take effect in the tracee.
This is caused by the `if (child->thread.fs != value)`, in
`ptrace.c:putreg`, which skips the `do_arch_prctl` call. Of course the
problem here is that while the optimization is in place `fs` is set to
0, but does not actually hold the fs base, so the call is incorrectly
skipped.
In any case, figured you may be interested that the commit changes behavior
(for the better - not complaining ;), even if user code does not go
out of its way to confuse ptrace.
Keno